Aberdeen Unitarian Church

CALENDAR

DECEMBER 2007
JANUARY 2008

 

calcovdecjan0708.jpg

CONTENTS


Secretary: Mr. Wm. S. Stephen, 18 Woodend Place, ABERDEEN, AB15 6AL


EDITOR'S FOREWORD

A Revel without a Cause

Let me declare at the outset that 1 am a robin-breasted, tinsel-tickled, holly-berried card carrying Christmas addict. 1 celebrate Christmas. I like this giving and receiving, this partying, this well-wishing, nostalgia-wallowing, tree-dressing, carol-singing, tinsel-decked festival..... but feelings are mixed. People tell me they don't care for it. There's too much stress; it's intrusive and too demanding; it's too expensive; it's too commercialised. Some of us feel we just can't cope. Some people feel under pressure to keep up with the Christmas Jonses., in spending more than they can afford on presents and entertainment. Some feel they will not be able to live up to the expectations their family may have of them in providing gifts and good cheer. Then there is the religious aspect of Christmas. Some serious-minded people are appalled by the tawdriness of the secular festivities and troubled by the fact that the spiritual significance is overlooked. If we are not celebrating the birth of Jesus what are we celebrating? Eating, drinking ,shopping, dressing up, having a good time?

This conflict between the spiritual and the material has troubled Christianity from the very beginning. The creation story in Genesis seems to suggest a material world but St. John's Gospel prefers a spiritual origin. 'In the beginning was the Word. And the Word was with God. And the Word was God'. Jesus, himself, had no time at all for worldly matters. He dismissed the whole apparatus of the Roman Empire in the sentence, 'Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's' while maintaining his focus upon the Kingdom of Heaven. St Francis of Assisi, his 12th century disciple, abandoned a life of luxury to follow the path of penury and self-denial. The 17th century French philosopher, Rene Descartes, the high priest of certainty and reason, declared that the properties of the mind and of the body are mutually exclusive and that only those of the mind may be trusted as God functions in the human mind rather than through the human senses., thus creating the 'mind/body problem' which still bothers us today. The problem was exacerbated in the fourth century by Pope Julius 1st who sanctioned a religious festival to celebrate the Birth of Jesus to coincide with several pagan festivals taking place at the winter solstice. These festivals all involved eating and drinking to extreme, decorating homes with holy berries, ivy and mistletoe (symbols of life in the dead of winter), giving and receiving presents, dancing, singing and merry-making. Grafting a new spiritual event to an ancient and very popular worldly occasion was bound to lead to confusion. What were people celebrating? The birth of the Sun God or the birth of the Son of God? And was it a festival of prayer or a feast of consumption? Various attempts have been made throughout history to resolve the situation by legislation. The Calvinists and the English Puritans prohibited the celebration of Christmas as a popish affectation. (The people of Scotland celebrated Hogmanay instead!) But the notion of feasting rather than fasting at the year's end has always been preferred and in these secular times, as the spirit has waned so consumption has once more gained its ancient yule-tide superiority. So are we now celebrating the return of the Unconquered Sun or are we just wallowing in self-indulgence? Proving our existence by over-eating. 'I consume, therefore, I am!' Or has Christmas become a cultural event, a revel without a cause? However, we may regard it, I hope that we all may share in its tradition of good-fellowship, good-neighbourliness, and its promise of peace and good-will to all.

Wm. S. Stephen (Editor)

william134@btinternet.com

Back to Contents


CHRISTMAS GREETINGS

We wish all our members the very best for themselves and their family and friends for the Christmas Season and the New Year. We wish to assure all our infirm and house-bound members of our continuing concern for their well-being. We shall be thinking of you particularly during this season of family togetherness and community caring. Our Minister, Revd. Cal Courtney will be with us over the weekend 8th/9th December and will be happy to call upon any of our members who would like to talk to him.

Back to Contents


FORTHCOMING EVENTS

Carol Service: December 2nd. Our Carol Service is slightly earlier this year to facilitate another event. However, this will give us an opportunity to welcome Advent by singing our favourite carols and to prepare for other good things to come.

Meditation Service: Friday 7th. December, 7.00pm. This is a deeply spiritual service when, inspired by music, words and candle-light, we can reach deep into ourselves to find that source of peace and reassurance that will help us cast off the vexations of the week. In the silence and the soft lighting, a new rhythm emerges, steady, unhurried, stilling our thoughts, preparing our mind for a more profound introspection. Afterwards, relaxed and happy, we enjoy an hour or so of pleasant company, over a cup of tea or on this occasion something more festive. It is also an opportunity to have an informal word with the Minister. Please join us. We value your company.

Festivals of Light: December 16th. Many religious traditions celebrate the return of the sun, by incorporating this elemental event into their mythology. Sue Good and her friends are to explore this phenomenon as part of our worship on this Sunday.

Christmas Cantata. December 23rd. Our Family Christmas Service will be a celebration of all the things we value at Christmastime, family togetherness, kindliness, concern for others, giving and receiving, tradition, peace and contentment, in words, music, song and meditation.

The Cotter's Sunday Lunch. January 27th. 12.00pm - 2.30pm. We usually pay homage to the memory of Robert Burns in our worship at the end of January. This year we thought we would include the traditional meal of haggis, neeps and tatties etc. as well as recalling the events of the poet's life in his songs and poems. To facilitate catering, a list for the names of those wishing to attend will eventually appear on the Notice Board. There will be a charge of 4.00pounds per person. Please join us to celebrate this important element of Scottish culture. 

Annual Scottish Country Dance. Saturday February 2nd. One of the most popular events in the Dancing calendar is our Annual Dance organised by Kathleen Bruce and the Terrace Dancers.

World War 2. Evening of Nostalgia. Friday 15th. February. 7.30pm. We plan to arrange several 'nostalgia evening' featuring different themes and occasions of our recent past. They will include, music and song, films and slides, story-telling, aand refreshments. We are to start by revisiting our memories (those of an age to have any) of the times, popular culture and events, local and national of W.W.2. Tickets, 4.00 pounds per person will be on sale shortly. Proceeds will be added to Church funds.

Quiz & Karaoke Night. Friday March 7th. Transport Club 7.30pm. To raise funds for our various Church projects, we are arranging a quiz night, which will conclude with a karaoke event! Substantial refreshments will be provided during the evening. Tickets, 5.pounds per person will be available son.

Annual General Meeting. Sunday 16th.March 10.30am. Our AGM will be a little earlier this year to accommodate other events. The Annual Report will available on Sunday 2nd March. Material for inclusion should be with the Church Secretary by 10th of February. Treasurers of societies should close their accounts on 31st. December and make their account books and receipts etc. available to the accounts examiner, Dr. Eric Naylor, as soon as possible thereafter.

General Assembly Annual Meetings 26th -29th March 2008 at Hatfield. In addition to the usual events, the GA will celebrate the Centenary of the Women's League and the new Executive will report on its first two years of office. The cost of full board (in student accommodation) and conference fees is 360 pounds per person. Forms of application which must be returned to Essex hall by 31st of January 2008, (late fee of 50 pounds), are now available from Church Secretary.

Felix Club Sponsored Walk. Saturday 12th. April. To raise funds for the Church, members of the Felix Club and anyone else who wishes to join them intend walking from Strichen to Fraserburgh, along the former Buchan Railway track,a 10 mile route which takes us around Mormond Hill and down to the sea, through interesting rural scenery. Sponsor Forms will be available shortly. We anticipate a generous response from non-participants.

Fashion Show. Another fund-raising activity, planned for the Spring, is a fashion Show. The date is still subject to negotiation.

Back to Contents


NON-FORTHCOMING EVENTS

Please note there will be NO Morning Service on Sunday 30th. December 2007.
There will be NO Terrace Cafe on Wednesday 26th December 2007 and on Wednesday 2nd January 2008. 

Back to Contents


"LEFT TO TELL"

by Immaculee llibagiza

Reviewed by Essie Wise 

Felicien was sobbing. I good feel his shame. He looked up at me for only a moment, but our eyes met. I reached out, touched his hands lightly, and quietly said what I'd come to say.

"I forgive you. "

My heart eased immediately, and I saw the tension release in Felicien's shoulders before Semana pushed him out the door and into the courtyard.

This is the incredible climax to Immaculee Ilibagiza's autobiography "Left to Tell" in which she describes the horror of living through the Rwanda genocide of 1994, 91 days of madness, in which more than a million people died at the hands of their neighbours.

Two soldiers yanked Felicien up by his armpits and dragged him back towards his cell. Semana was furious. 

"What was that all about, lmmaculee? That was the man who murdered your family. I brought him to you to question, to spit on if you wanted to. But you forgave him. How could you. do that? Why did you forgive him?

I, answered him with the truth: "Forgiveness is all I have to offer. " 

None of the Christian virtues is easy to exercise but forgiveness is surely the most difficult of all, and Immaculee did not find it easy to forgive her neighbour who killed her mother and her brother, looted their home and pursued her relentlessly for three month, during which she lived in terror of this man and his mob of killers and hated him as much as she feared. By sheer willpower, however, Immaculee, a devout Catholic, resolved to transform hatred into forgiveness in order to put the suffering of the Rwanda holocaust behind her and find peace of mind at last.

Immaculee was a member of a Tutsi family. Her father, Leonard was the headmaster of the local secondary school, her mother a primary school teacher, her two older brothers were university graduates, her younger brother was at secondary school and she was studying maths and science at the State University of Butare. They were a close-knit family, undemonstrative, but deeply committed to each other and to their religious beliefs. 

Immaculee, then, was a tall, attractive girl, highly intelligent, articulate in French as well as her native language, exuberant, self-confident, free of prejudice and deeply religious. She made friends easily, had a highly developed sense of fun, was high-spirited and took part in various student societies.

The family lived in the Kibuye province on the banks of Lake Kivu, which separates Rwanda from Zaire. Their home village was quiet and remote. Hutus and Tutsis lived happily together, inter-marrying, cooperating, sharing, concerned about keeping body and soul together in one of Africa's poorest countries, untroubled by tribal differences, historical rivalries and past resentments. However, in Kigale, the capital, political events, provoked by unresolved tribal conflicts and exploited by ambitious and unscrupulous politicians, spread suspicion, unrest, terror and eventually open warfare throughout the country. The government was dominated by Hutu extremists who employed the media, particularly the radio, to demonise and dehumanise the Tutsis and to encourage their Hutu neighbours to exterminate them as vermin, burn their homes, seize their land and possessions and destroy every record of their very existence. Emboldened by the government's licence to kill, and with the promise of rich booty to be had, inspired by old resentments and long-suppressed jealousies, many of the Hutus, armed with machetes, spears, sticks, rocks and guns turned upon their unarmed and vulnerable Tutsi neighbours. Men, women and children were hacked to death, in their own homes, in the streets, in their fields, schools, university, wherever they might be found. Immaculee's Tutsi neighbours sought help from her father, the most respected man in the area. Panic stricken, they crowded around his house, seeking refuge, urging him to negotiate with the local extremists on their behalf. He tried, and was hacked to pieces. Their home was attacked. The family fled. Immaculee and her younger brother sought refuge with Murinzi, the local Protestant Pastor, a family friend, a widower and a Hutu, who had married a Tutsi, and who, with great courage, for friendship's sake and in fulfIlment of his Christian duty, agreed to help. 

Although grateful to Murinzi for saving her life, and jeopardising his own and that of his family in doing so, Immaculee admits to hating him as well, because, in the end he refused to shelter her younger brother and his friend, and drove them out of his house. They tried to conceal themselves in the fields, but were eventually discovered, beaten to death and dismembered.

Murinzi, however, kept faith with Immaculee and seven other Tutsi women whom he concealed in a tiny bathroom attached to his own bedroom. There was insufficient space to lie down so they were obliged to stand and to take it in turns to sit on the floor. There was a flushing toilet and Murinzi brought them food and drink late at night, if he could do so unobserved.

Felicien and his band, searching for Immaculee, ransacked the Pastor's house several times, convinced he was hiding her, but failed to discover the bathroom door, concealed behind a large wardrobe. In these cramped conditions and never free of the fear of discovery, Immaculee and her companions spent ninety days, during which their family and friends were hunted down and killed.

Severe as the physical suffering was, it was nothing compared to the mental torture they endured hour by hour, day by day, the dread of imminent discovery bearing down upon them, crushing their spirit, and reducing them to trembling nonentities during the frequent raids made by their pursuers. 

Immaculee's account of these 90 days is the spiritual heart of her book. As with the others, she .was powerless in the grip of terror. Fear furnished her mind with images of her seizure, of her humiliation, naked in the hands of her enemies, of witnessing her own dismemberment, limb by limb and finally of feeling grateful for the coup de grace. Their situation was hopeless. They could not remain concealed for ever. What if their benefactor turned against them, yielding to the fear of reprisals and the murderous radio propaganda? Why should they escape, when their family and friends had already met their doom? Were they so special? Negative thoughts washed through her brain like a tide, sweeping away hope and the desire to survive. 'Let's get it over with as soon as possible.' Immaculee characterised these negative feelings as evil, brewed by the Devil, and turned to prayer as an antidote. She felt her Catholic faith was under attack. God was on trial. Using her rosary, she prayed non-stop throughout the day and night, asking for God's protection. She meditated for hours on end upon Biblical passages that dealt. with the power of faith; faith would be her refuge; she visualised two shafts of bright light piercing the ceiling and guarding the bathroom door, God's presence, reassuring her of his concern for her plight. However, anger towards the whole world which seemed unconcerned by their plight, and hatred for the Hutus, including Murinzi, more consuming than she had ever experienced before, created a barrier between herself and her God. God excluded no one from his embracing love. To deserve God's protection, she too had to forgive and love everyone, even her tormentors, She withdrew into herself and tried to understand the killers, to find some compassion for them, even to forgive them. A week past as she struggled with her thoughts, constantly interrupted from outside by the screams and moans of the dying, the innocent victims of these same killers. Eventually she persuaded herself that they were children misled by evil, and that the ignorance and mistakes of children are more easily forgiven than those of adults. Suddenly she pitied them and asked God to forgive them. Having achieved this spiritual victory over self, she felt calmer, more assured of God's love and protection. From now on, until the end of her confinement, she lived almost entirely in her own mind, creating for herself a mental refuge, constructed out of prayer, contemplation and submission to the will of God. Whatever happened to her now, happened with God's approval.

Eventually, the Hutu extremists were overthrown and the killing ended. Immaculee went in search of her murdered family, discovering the mutilated remains of her mother and oldest brother whom she laid to rest. Of her father and youngest brother, there was no sign; they had perished in the holocaust and they would remain unidentified for ever.

The value of "Left to Tell" lies in its authenticity as testimony to human depravity and cruelty, unsparing in its frankness and unchallengeable in its accuracy, on the one hand, but also to the human spirit, its resilience, its strength and its ability to transcend. Immaculee's anger, hatred and terror were thoroughly justified, but she had a vision of a nobler humanity that aspires to an understanding and love of her, fellow creatures that transcends transitory impressions and selfish concerns. Forgiveness, however it is achieved, through religious exercise or emotional maturity or compassion or common sense or as a response to genuine remorse is surely the most difficult relationship to enter into and also the most divine. 

"Left to Tell" is published by Hay House

Back to Contents


WHAT IS YOUR GOD LIKE?

by Sue Good

Gandhi said that there are as many gods as there are people. I thought I might explore the different views we may hold about God. It sounds like a good idea, but as usual, it's quite difficult to express. The result is very subjective, but I hope that some bits of it may strike a chord with you, whatever your own experience.

If you have ever had to find a joke with a religious theme for a particular occasion, you'll know that the stock of "God" jokes are all fairly hoary old chestnuts, but I hope you'll forgive my telling you this one, as it fits into my subject today so well. The wee girl was busy drawing and her mum asked her what the picture was all about. "It's a picture of God", the girl replied. "But no-one knows what God looks like" said the mother. "Well, they will do once I've finished", was the reply. I have often wondered what sort of picture she might have produced. Was it the classic old man, with flowing beard and dressed in a nightdress? Or would it have been more of a Superman figure or something like ET? Inevitably, our ideas about God and at least at first, our experiences of God, tend to come to us from others. That can leave us seriously open to what may be very deformed images of God. Take this one, for instance, which Gerard Hughes relates:-

It is though as little children our loving parents take us to visit "Good Old Uncle George", a man of great wealth and influence. Our parents tell us he lives to help us all. Uncle George, an elderly, bearded and forbidding man, lives in a large and gloomy mansion. One day, at the end of your visit, Uncle George turns to you and declares, "I want you to visit me here regularly, and if you fail to come, let me show you what will happen." He leads you down to the mansion's overheated basement. He opens a steel door and you see row upon row of blazing furnaces, into which men, women and children are being hurled by little demons. "That", says Uncle George, "is what will happen to you if you don't visit me regularly" Safely upstairs again, you clutch at your parents in terror. On the way home, Mummy leans over and says "And don't you love Uncle George with all your heart and soul and mind and strength?" Remembering the furnaces, you lie and say "Yes", but you loathe Uncle George and consider him a monster. The lie becomes part of your life, so that you continue to profess love of Uncle George, visit him dutifully, say all the right things about how wonderful he is and how grateful you are for his kindness, but deep down you detest him and want nothing to do with him

That's quite a fearsome picture and one which those of you lucky enough to have been brought up as Unitarians may find quite strange, but it's probably quite a common one to linger on into adulthood. My own childhood fears were less to do with hell than with purgatory, a sort of lesser fiery place that just about everyone was said to end up in for a time before being allowed into heaven, even if they were great saints. My impression of God at that time was that he was incredibly nitpicking:- you only had to forget to say your prayers, or take a drink of water before going to communion and you had committed a sin. Speaking to him was always done in set prayers, full of words like "beseech" and "vouchsafe" that hadn't got a lot to do with everyday life. Another barrier for me was that God was always portrayed as a father. Brought up in an exclusively female atmosphere at home and at boarding school, I didn't know any fathers: in fact, apart from priests and doctors, I didn't know any men at all. So while God as a mother would have made sense, God as a father did not. My childhood idea of God was of a benevolent sort of village policeman, happy to look after you and jovial just as long as you behaved, but woe betide you if you flouted any of the bye-laws.

At the very opposite end of the spectrum is the view of God that sometimes bursts on the mind with great power. It's encountered at evangelical gatherings and services, radiates enthusiasm and is especially attractive to young people, who become very committed Christians leading biblically-based lives. It also often requires an outpouring of emotion, particularly in worship situations. Great Uncle George and the village policemen were caricatures, but this view of God as the object of love and the purpose of life is genuine. The trouble is, for those of us of a more phlegmatic turn of mind, the way of responding to it is almost incomprehensible. If getting in touch with God is going to involve hand-waving, swaying or bursts of visible emotion, we just don't want to do it. It seems akin to falling in love, in human terms; the very early stages or honeymoon period of a relationship. Long-term, I feel that this high level emotional involvement is just not sustainable and has eventually to change into something that's more comfortable. I'm not saying that one would never have moments of emotion, just that if you eat caviar every day you would cease to regard it as a treat.

So far we've come from childhood views of God to a more adult one, but where do we go from there? Do we seek out different views of God, or do we stick to the one we have found? Does our idea of God change and develop as we grow older, or is it basically the same as when we were 21? Do we even believe in a personal God at all, or simply in a shared spirit or ancestral memory? Does it matter that we all hold differing views? Once upon a time I would have been convinced that it did, but now I simply look on it as each person's unique way of looking at exactly the same thing; the common spark of love that we all possess and that some call God. Keeping the spark active is something that we also have so many different ways of doing, depending on our background. You might call it ways of encountering God and I think humans need some high points to identify contact. The mainstream Christian churches have always understood this well and their services are a blend of music and prayer that can be very moving, particularly the celebration of Holy Communion. But it is possible to take part in that totally as an individual, as part of a personal encounter with God. Contrast that with the lunch we held here in the summer, sharing food and conversation, then sharing thoughts and songs and it seems to me that that was much more of a communion than many masses are.

It seems that my view of God changes and develops as I do, although always influenced by the past. There's a line in one of the songs in the hymn-book. It says "Roots hold me close, wings set me free" and that does seem to describe my experience of God quite well. Knowing about God is one thing, however, and knowing God is something very different. The unknown author of "The Cloud of Unknowing", which was written around 1350, says "Though we cannot know him we can love him. By love he may be touched and embraced, never by thought" But if we're going to love someone, we have to at least speak to them and try to get to know them better. Whole libraries of books have been written on how to go about getting in contact with God and it probably won't surprise you to know that this topic today was sparked off by my discovery of two of these books.

Both of them are modern, both American and both might be described as belonging to the New Age Spirituality category. Julia Cameron is an artist and writer of novels, plays, films, poetry etc. Her book "God is no laughing matter" was written as an antidote to the kind of artificial piety that's prevalent in American media circles. Her style and the situations are very American, but if you can see past that, she gives many very useful suggestions for exploring the God connection in ways you might never have thought of. Here's one of her short pieces, called "Blind Date":-

Most of us don't know where to start with God. We've got a lot of excess baggage and expectations and "God as Told to Us By" and it can feel an awful lot like a Blind Date - the kind you see in those vintage romantic comedies where everybody knows he's the right guy or she's the right girl except the one resisting the date.

The trick with God - just like with Blind Dates - is to suit up and show up. Who knows? God might turn out to be tall and handsome. Or blond and curvy. Someone you might really like. Somebody you can actually talk to and go salsa dancing with. Somebody who gets your jokes and likes the same terrible monster movies that you do.

The point is that until you try to meet God, you aren't going to know. If your earphones are unspooling the "Here's what God is like" tapes of everybody else, the Spiritual Big Cheeses, you might miss God disguised as the nice trash man who takes your extra load of stuff without making you phone in to bureaucracy hell for another truck and driver. You might miss God as the red-winged blackbird or the shiny river stone. You might miss God, period. Much of what you learn about God in this country can sound a lot like a military training film, very stern and authoritarian. The message runs along the lines of "God is no laughing matter". Pm not so sure about that. I think God might have a pretty good sense of humour. Look at octopuses, for example, and baboons. Yes, sometimes I think we are the ones who are grim and God is just pacing around cloud nine, waiting for us to lighten up a little. It's possible.

If God is very "serious" to you, you may want to explore just why. Is it God or your conditioning? A bad experience with God, as with dating, can leave you soured.

Then she goes on to detail various exercises to help you sort out your ideas of what God is like and where they come from. I wonder whether it is a coincidence that Julia started out in life as a Catholic, I did myself and the author of the second book I'm going to speak about did too. Perhaps childhood conditioning kick-starts the process of searching, or perhaps conscience operates more powerfully in us, Neale Donald Walsch was always a seeker and a restless character in his personal and professional life. He was a radio producer and later had his own public relations firm. His relationships were problematical and he was lucky to survive a head-on car collision. In 1992, following a period of deep despair, Neale awoke in the middle of a February night and wrote an anguished letter to God. "What does it take," he angrily scratched across a yellow legal pad, "to make life work'?" Now well chronicled and widely talked about, it was this questioning letter that received a Divine answer. Neale says that he heard a voice, soft and kind, warm and loving, that gave him an answer to this and other questions. Awestruck and inspired, he quickly scribbled these responses onto the tablet. These and subsequent answers became the basis for a series of book called "Conversations with God" Now, whether you believe that actually happened or not doesn't really matter. What is important is whether the material produced has any value, any clues as to how to know God. You can judge for yourself in this passage, which purports to be God's instructions on that topic,

Get close to me! Do what you can. Do what you have to. Do what it takes. Say a rosary. Kiss a stone. Bow to the East. Chant a chant, Swing a pendulum. Test a muscle. Or write a book.
Do what it takes.
Each of you has your own construction. Each of you has understood me - created me - in your own way.
To some of you I am a man. To some of you I am a woman. To some, I am both. To some, I am neither.
To some of you I am pure energy. To some, the ultimate feeling, which you call love. And some of you have no idea what I am. You simply know that I AM. And so it is, I AM.
I am the wind which rustles your hair. I am the sun which warms your body. I am the rain which dances on your face. I am the smell of flowers in the air, and I am the flowers which send their fragrance upward. I am the air which carries the fragrance.
I am the beginning of your first thought. I am the end of your last. I am the idea which sparked your most brilliant moment. I am the glory of its fulfillment. I am the feeling which fuelled the most loving thing you ever did. I am the part of you which yearns for that feeling again and again.
Whatever works for you, whatever makes in happen- whatever ritual, ceremony, demonstration, meditation, thought, song, word or action it takes for you to "reconnect" - do this. Do this in remembrance of me.

Whatever you may think about the origins of that passage, you would have to admit that it is a very inclusive and liberal view of God, perhaps a very Unitarian one. We each have an individual view of God and being convinced that ours is the right one is surely  good thing, since it is right for us. Just as each part of the jigsaw is different, but together they make a whole picture, so is each one of us part of the whole picture that is God. That must be so if is is true that we are made in his image. I don't know what your God is like, I'm not even entirely sure what mine is like, but I am working on it. It's seen quite a few changes and adjustments already and I'm sure there will be more to come. After all, it's a lifetime project. The comedian Dave Allen used to sign off his show in the same way every time and it seems an appropriate ending for me. He used to say "Good night and may your God go with you."

(The title for this address is borrowed from a practical book by the Jesuit theologian, Gerard Hughes.)

Back to Contents


FINANCIAL

The Anniversary Fair final total reached £724.50. We wish to thank everyone who helped to raise this sum, both the givers and the workers.

The Anniversary Appeal has so far raised £749.00. The Appeal is still open and if you have not yet subscribed to it, our Treasurer will be delighted to receive your donation. As we indicated in the October Calendar, we need to do our utmost to pay our way, month by month, from live income.

The Women's League's Sales Table on Saturday 17th. November, raised £100.00, a truly magnificent response. The Women's League wish to thank everyone who helped staff the stall, baked, donated goods and made their purchases.

The Diabetic collection box this year has yielded £100.05. We express our appreciation of the generosity of our members who week by week donate their small change to this worthwhile charity. 

Back to Contents


WOMEN'S LEAGUE PROGRAMME

JANUARY 2008

9th R.S.P.B. A talk by Mr Parnaby
16th The I.A.L.R.W. A talk by Jean Inkson
23rd Robert Burns Remembered
30th An Afternoon at the Opera

Back to Contents


backcovdecjan0708.jpg

CONTENTS


Next Calendar

Previous Calendar

Current Calendar 

Return to main page