Historical Note: Previous Internet Readings Results Analysis
During 1999, I attempted a series of blind readings of my cards over the Internet. All I knew initially of my subjects was their e-mail address.
I had a total of 17 subjects, although unfortunately 6 did not give me any feedback. At that time I was using a single line of 10 cards for my readings.
Blind Readings Analysis (1st April, 1999)
11 Subjects, giving a possible total of 110 marks for cards.
Immediately recognised as appropriate: 79
Correct but considered general: 14
Marked as coming clear later: 12
Questionable: 4
Apparent miss: 1
That 6 of my subjects gave me no feedback was particularly unfortunate as I learnt more about the cards from my mistakes than from when I was merely correct.
Specifically, I found that the cards would not reveal the subjects age or if they were physically male or female. With hindsight, this was logical within a dimensional framework, as the cards are based on dimensions of the mind only. Physicality is spatial and time is a dimension in its own right. On the other hand, attitudes frequently came across clearly.