VIEWING IMAGES

Home

Quick links:

1. Slides v's Prints

2. Microscope & Lightbox

3. Slide Scanner



1. Slides v's Prints

I prefer to use colour slides rather than colour prints. This is mainly due to the ability to view the 'positive' images directly on a lightbox. They can be easily projected onto large screens and can be digitally scanned to produce colour prints.

I have a Leitz Pradovit Colour 250. This is an old but high quality projector which has an excellent lens, the Colorplan 1:2.5/90mm, which produces sharp images.

 

2. Microscope & Lightbox

MicroscopeI am fortunate to have a good stereo microscope to view slides on a lightbox. The microscope has variable magnification which enables areas of interest to be viewed in detail. It also provides a good stand-off from the slide, which you don't get with a single eye magnifier or lupe. The stereo microscope provides a fantastic view of the slides and you can almost imagine you are viewing the scenes directly through some incredible binoculars. On a cloudy wet night this approach allows you to view the scenes in comfort and with greater sense of realism than can be achieved with a colour print. A photo through the microscope eyepiece is shown opposite. Who needs a telescope!

A useful trick is to cover the lightbox with a piece of black card with a hole cut in it to take the slide. This removes stray light from entering the microscope and improves the viewing.

 

3. Slide Scanner

A slide scanner was the next 'must have' item after the lightbox and microscope. I bought an Acer Scanwit 2720S, which can scan at resolutions of 2700 dpi (dots per inch). This can achieve a very high level of detail in a scanned image and is more than adequate for A4 size colour printouts.

The software provided with the scanner is Miraphoto. I have also bought Vuescan software, which allows greater control of the scanning process.

The images below show the capability of a slide scanner. Image 1, is of Cassiopeia taken with a 200mmm f4 lens. The slide is scanned at 2700 dpi resolution. The small area which is boxed, is shown in image 2. This is further expanded in images 3, 4 and 5 to show the individual pixels.

 

Cassiopeia

1. Cassiopeia

Image used for zooming in below

Cassiopeia

2. View of small box from above right

3. Zoomed in

4. ..and again

5. .. and again

 

A 200 mm lens has a field of view of 7.2 x 10.3 degrees. A 35mm slide measures 24 x 36 mm. With 2700 pixels per inch, this gives a resolution of approximately 10 arc seconds per pixel.

Image 5 shows the quality of both the tracking accuracy when the photo was taken and the scanning performance. This image was resampled in Photoshop to increase the image size from 19 x 19 pixels to 150 x 150 pixels. The result is show in image 6 below. The resampling does manage to improve the separation between the central trio of stars. The tracking accuracy is probably 10 arc seconds or better.

6. Image 5 above resized/resampled in Photoshop

 

Top