Please note that this item is copyright Richard Alexander. It may be freely copied for non-commercial use, provided this copyright notice remains attached and the text is not altered without my permission. Commercial use of the text is forbidden without agreement as to payment. (Normally I will accept the usual wordage rate.)
Total Liberty vol4/1 (Autumn/Winter
2003) : A Journal of Evolutionary Anarchism A4 16pp. £1.00 per issue. Subscription £8.00 for 4 issues
(£5.00 for low income) from J.P. Simcock, 47, High Street, Belper, Derby, DE56
1GF.
Total Liberty is probably one of the lesser-known anarchist
magazines (journal is perhaps too grand a word for it) currently published in
Britain. It is not aligned to any
particular perspective but is open to any contributor who is willing to discuss
matters of interest to un-hyphenated anarchists, especially those exploring
ideas rather than just following a party line. A wide variety of writers have
contributed to previous issues including Brian Morris, Richard Griffin, Dennis
Gould, Donald Rooum, Larry Gambone. Joe Peacott, Steve Booth and many others.
Indeed they have even been generous enough to include the occasional item
by this reviewer.
The current issue under review focuses on the issue of
individual vs collective / communist anarchism, or rather most contributors
don’t see these as necessarily opposed, rather taking both a pragmatic
approach wherein it is best left to experimentation to decide which if either is
to be the preferred economic model, and the principled which sees that any
society based on voluntary association has to leave it open for individuals and
groups of individuals to determine which is their optimal size of associated
organisation (from 1 to infinity). Another
theme that emerges is that of authority (in contra-distinction to power) and
some twerp ways in with a review of Lobster magazine which was obviously written
on the single day this year when Iraq wasn’t a major news item. This current
issue doesn’t really have a standout, must-read article; rather it is one in a
series. Many of the articles concern ongoing debates. Which, it has to be said,
the final words of which are very unlikely to be written. (Fortunately, copies
of Issues 2 –12, are still available so if you haven’t read the magazine
before you can go back and find out everyone is talking about.)
Jonathan Simcock, the editor and publisher, does a good job
of laying out and editing his magazine and the general tone is one of friendly
discussion. Differences are aired but abuse and haranguing is avoided. In many
ways Total Liberty has the appearance of being one that a newcomer to anarchism
might feel most comfortable with, although I have to say that the contributors
are overwhelmingly old hands, people who, in many but not all cases, have been
around the anarchist movement for 30 years or more. (Again the reviewer admits
his guilt in this regard!) Amore activist reviewer might regard Total Liberty as
Freedom on Valium but us old timers prefer a more measured approach to our
politics. Total Liberty also has a web site at: http://mysite.freeserve.com/total_liberty1
and Jonathan can be e-mailed at: ain@ziplip.com.
Given the low price I can recommend that readers send off
for a sample copy to get a flavour of it, or have butchers at the web site,
which has a few articles from earlier issues. As a contributor to the magazine I
would naturally like to encourage people to subscribe. But don’t wait until
you’ve been active for over 30 years before writing for it. (Actually one of
the contributors to the current issue is a teenage anarchist, so it’s not just
for old farts!!)
Summary: Worth a quid of anyone’s money.
7/10
Richard Alexander