eco-city design

walkable centres

public transport

road layout

variations

resiliency

efficient buildings

sustainable farming

quality of life

more

Road Layout

I've used the phrase 'fully pedestrianised' at least twice so far, so I'd forgive you for thinking I'm one of those hardcore environmentalists who hate cars.  But I'm really not.

In June 2010 I attended the Towards Carfree Cities conference in York, and I was very much looking forward to it.

What happened?  I left early.  And went for a drive.

If I'm going to drive less, it will be because there are better alternatives available, not because someone spends 2 hours telling me that cars are bad.

When I see a pedestrian barrier I just climb straight over it, even if I wasn't going that way, just to show that I will not be stopped.

 - Matthew Parris, Grumpy Old Men

I want all the benefits of a carfree city – streets dedicated to people, real communities, excellent public transportation – I just don't want to give up driving to get them.

Revolutionary Road(s)

What we need is a system that keeps the streets pedestrian friendly, discourages travelling within the city by car, but has little impact on out of town trips.

The discouragement of car trips within the city is necessary for decent public transport, but it also benefits drivers.  If everyone uses the trolleybuses to travel around the city, it means a lot less traffic when you do need to use your car.

This is accomplished in two ways.  Firstly, roads have very few connections and go around the city rather than through it.

The interior road network is deliberately unconnected

Secondly, roads within the city's districts emphasise a pleasant pedestrian environment rather than short journey times for drivers.

Speed limits are no higher than 20mph here.  And where roads cross pedestrian streets, raised intersections slow cars further and pedestrians have right of way.

Likewise, where roads cross over the trolleybus lines, trolleybuses always have priority.

But a couple of minutes later, once you've made it out of the district, you're onto the regular road network and you're away.

Indeed, the city would likely be easier to drive around than our current cities.  There are no complicated one-way systems.  Traffic lights, junctions and roundabouts are kept to a bare minimum.  Traffic would be a good deal lighter.  But it's only the trolleybuses that get to take the direct route.

Radburn

For the roads within districts, there are two options available: the Radburn model and the woonerf.

The Radburn model segregates cars from people, with houses fronting onto the main pedestrian network, and a secondary road network hidden behind the backs of houses.

Segregated pedestrian and road networks

With the woonerf/home zone, cars and people share the same space, but priority is given to pedestrians and cyclists.

Both concepts definitely have their merits, but I believe the Radburn model to be superior at higher densities.  Without driveways, cars would dominate the woonerf streetscape.  And every extra car driving on a woonerf street impacts on that street, whereas the pedestrian streets of the Radburn model are unaffected by traffic levels.

Thus every house in the city will front onto a pedestrian street.  Buildings adjacent to roads are orientated away from them, with their gardens acting as a barrier between.

Emergency Vehicles

Standard emergency vehicles are used in the city, with the possible addition of a second, quieter siren.

They can use the trolleybus lanes for fast movement between districts, and when using their lights and sirens they are the only vehicles that may travel above 30mph on the trolleybus lanes, and above walking speed on pedestrian streets.

Freight

To keep heavy lorries off the pedestrian streets as much as possible, businesses with the highest freight requirements – furniture stores, light industry etc. – are located along the edges of car parks and roads within districts.

Loading zones highlighted in yellow

Loading zones, highlighted here in yellow, allow for direct delivery/collection of freight from two directions:

  • From the exterior road network via conventional lorries and vans.

  • From the interior trolley network.

Since rail is a far more efficient means of transporting goods over long distances than lorries, companies should be encouraged to use the city's rail freight depot.

And the most efficient way of delivering containers from the rail freight depot to businesses around the city is by trolleylorry.  Trolleylorries would share the trolleybus network outside of peak hours, approaching their destinations as close as possible using the overhead lines, and then switching to battery power for final delivery.

Trolleylorries aren't needed to begin with, but would be added as the city grows

Where necessary, cars and vans are permitted to use the pedestrian streets for the movement of heavy goods, but they may travel no faster than walking speed and pedestrians still have priority.

Continue

Home