eco-city design

the theory

walkable centres

public transport

road layout

freight

density

sustainability

more

The Theory

It is often said that we love our cars.  This may be true for many people.  But some of us would prefer not to drive.  Yes, really.

Why?  The huge amounts of money our cars cost us, having to battle our way through rush-hour traffic, hunting for parking spaces, dangerous drivers ... the list goes on.

Unfortunately, the modern world has been so designed around the car that it is almost impossible to live without one.  And so we carry on driving.

This is plainly ridiculous.  Cars aren't exactly good for the environment, with even zero-emission vehicles being enormously wasteful of energy.  And while someone driving everywhere because they choose to is one thing, forcing the rest of us to do likewise when we really don’t want to is stupidity in the extreme.

But, says the government, we're locating new development to be accessible by walking, cycling and public transport as well as by car.

It's not much of a choice though, is it?  Yes we can walk, but we're still breathing in everyone else's car fumes.  We've still got to wait for the little green man just to cross the street.  And our overcrowded buses still get stuck behind all those single occupancy cars.

If we're going to give up our cars we want all the benefits that can bring:  clean air, networks of pedestrian streets and excellent public transportation.


Walkability

Walking is the greenest mode of transport there is.  It's also healthy, and leads to more vibrant communities.  And, having spent the last 50+ years designing our towns and cities so completely around the car, today's planners are at last beginning to see its importance.

But they're not going far enough.

Pedestrian Streets

Compare the 2 streets pictured below:

Traffic-calmed streets have none of the magic of a good pedestrian street.   Free of the ugliness cars bring, its worth making pedestrian streets beautiful.

The first street is a traffic-calmed street with wider than usual footpaths; a balance between cars and people.  But air pollution, noise and danger, while reduced compared to an ordinary 30mph road, are far from eliminated.  And the street is still dominated by cars, both visually and by right of way.

The second, fully pedestrianised street is altogether more pleasant.  Footsteps and voices are the only sounds.  The air is clean.  And if you want to visit a shop on the other side of the street you just cross, with no fear of being run down.  It's a place for people, not machines.

Access by Proximity

Less obviously, cars also spread cities out with all their roads and car parks until walking is no longer an option anyway.

We need to build communities compact enough to have a full range of services - grocery stores, schools, post offices etc. - within a 5 to 10 minute walk of every home. 


Better Public Transport

Public transport (assuming it has more than a handful of passengers onboard) uses less energy and produces less pollution than if the same number of people had travelled by car, and it requires less land.  With full buses and trams these savings are substantial.

But just providing us with an alternative to our cars is not enough.  Public transport needs to be fast, convenient and pleasant to ride.  And the great investment this requires can only be justified if ridership is high.

Picture a city where most people travel by car.  With little investment the bus service is adequate at best, with buses running infrequently and getting bogged down by everyone else's cars.  So anyone with a choice switches back to their car, and less riders means even less investment and the service gets worse still.

When they get caught in traffic, more buses and drivers are needed to provide a given service and so cost more to run.

Now imagine if everyone in that same city used public transport.  With so many riders we could have buses running every few minutes - we would need them to to move so many people - and all night long.  There would be no traffic for them to get caught up in.  And with that much investment we could replace the diesel buses with electric trolleybuses or trams.  Everyone would benefit.

With lots of passengers and no cars to get in their way, buses can reach a new level of efficiency.


Cars and Freedom

For those of you worrying about losing the freedom your car brings, don't.  Living in a pedestrian city doesn't mean getting rid of your car, it just means parking it a little further away.

And if you find you're only driving occasionally you can join a carshare scheme instead, saving thousands of pounds a year but still giving you access to a car when you need one.

Or, if you're still not convinced, look at it this way:  the more people there are living in pedestrian cities, then the fewer cars in front of you on your drive to work.

Continue

Home