There are three different district layouts below, giving three
different answers to this question.
Car-lite District
This layout provides access to a car club (or carshare) car within a 2 minute walk of every
home.
Buildings
Pedestrian street
Green space
Road/parking
A car club gives residents easy access to a car when they need it,
but without all the expense and hassles of owning a car of their own.
I can’t understand why people are frightened of new ideas. I’m frightened of the old ones.
- John Cage
Users pay a small annual membership, and after that it's
pay-as-you-go. Vehicles can be rented by the hour, or for days at a
time. So you only pay for a car when you need it, not when you
don't.
Insurance is
included in the price. And someone else takes care of all the
servicing and maintenance.
And with a city-wide car club, it would be possible to offer a
massive variety of vehicles: small cars; family cars; sports cars and
convertibles; pick ups and estates for moving goods; 7-seater people
carriers; luxury cars; even specialist vehicles like the tilting Carver
One.
I believe this layout offers the best
compromise between a fully pedestrian community and nearby access to a
car.
Carfree District
With this layout, car club vehicles and cars belonging to residents are parked in
the
peripheral car park, leaving the
district entirely carfree.
It offers a slightly higher quality pedestrian environment, but some
residents will be in for an 8 minute walk every time they need use of a car.
Radburn District
The ultimate have-your-cake-and-eat-it district, this layout is based on Radburn, New Jersey.
The main thoroughfares within the district are still the pedestrian
streets. But here, residents can park their own cars on rear driveways.
However, this layout will tend to encourage greater car use than car-lite
and carfree districts. Front gardens would have to shrink drastically to achieve
the same density due to the space taken up by the extra roads. And
the rear driveways will eat into back gardens.
Note that the centre of the district remains
fully pedestrianised. High density
living and cars do not mix.
Pick 'n Mix
All three of these district types could be built within
the same city, offering residents a choice of lifestyles: completely
carfree; easy access to a car club car; or parking at the rear of their
property.
And most importantly, all three district types maintain
an excellent pedestrian environment, with cars tucked away behind
buildings, and pedestrians always having priority over drivers.
There's never any waiting for the little green man.
Phasing
Until the city reaches a sufficient size, residents will have to
travel outside the city often for jobs and services. Thus extra
car parking would be provided during the construction phase, arranged so
that every house still fronts onto a pedestrian street.
Once the city has grown large enough, these extra car parks would then
be replaced by buildings.
Imperfect Circles
The diagrams above show each district as a perfect circle, but this
is more for reasons of simplicity than a design choice.
In reality, each district would be shaped by the local geography
somewhat. And jagged edges will lead to more interesting streets
within.
For greater diversity, some districts might also be built smaller and
denser than the standard, with others built larger and less dense.