|
| |
Latest Updates:
27 FEBRUARY 2005
25 FEBRUARY 2005
23 FEBRUARY 2005
22 FEBRUARY 2005
20 FEBRUARY 2005
19 FEBRUARY 2005
18 FEBRUARY 2005
15 FEBRUARY 2005
13 FEBRUARY 2005
9 FEBRUARY 2005
8 FEBRUARY 2005
6 FEBRUARY 2005
4 FEBRUARY 2005
2 FEBRUARY 2005
1 FEBRUARY 2005
30 JANUARY 2005
29 JANUARY 2005
27 JANUARY 2005
26 JANUARY 2005
24 JANUARY 2005
17 JANUARY 2005
16 JANUARY 2005
15 JANUARY 2005
10 JANUARY 2005
08 JANUARY 2005
06 JANUARY 2005
01 JANUARY 2005
31 DECEMBER 2004
30 DECEMBER 2004
29 DECEMBER 2004
26 DECEMBER 2004
24 DECEMBER 2004
23 DECEMBER 2004
22 DECEMBER 2004
21 DECEMBER 2004
20 DECEMBER 2004
19 DECEMBER 2004
17 DECEMBER 2004
17 DECEMBER 2004
16 DECEMBER 2004
15 DECEMBER 2004
14 DECEMBER 2004
13 DECEMBER 2004
13 DECEMBER 2004
12 DECEMBER 2004
11 DECEMBER 2004
10 DECEMBER 2004
09 DECEMBER 2004
07 DECEMBER 2004
07 DECEMBER 2004
05 DECEMBER 2004
01 DECEMBER 2004
|
|
27 FEBRUARY 2005 09:00GMTVan Persie, pushing the ref and why Arsenal must be more like Phil Neville
This report is frankly too long. But on the plus side it is handily divided into four sections: a review of yesterday’s game, the issue of how an Arsenal player pushing a ref would have been dealt with in the press, how we need to learn from Phil Neville (really) and the issue of where we’re at. So read what suits you.
Firstly, there's a good piece by the usually sane Ian Ridley on Patrick Vieira in this morning's Observer. Whilst it's a well reasoned article, I'm not going to beat around the bush here - I like it because he largely agrees with me when he says: "It is not that he (Vieira) is playing especially badly, nor Arsenal by and large; it is more that he appears distracted, well below his considerable potential." Now besides the fact that I think our defence by and largely is playing badly, that pretty much sums things up for me.
With the exception of our 4-1 win at Norwich, this was the only Arsenal game this season I haven’t seen in person or live on the TV. So it was left to watching the highlights on Match of the Day, which though often inconclusive, can provide an interesting perspective on the game.
At the most basic level, we once again suffered from shocking defending. Frankly, a five year old could have written the script: a corner headed in by Peter Crouch, with Jens, Cygan and Senderos looking at all at sea around him. It’s happened so many times this season it’s simply untrue. Indeed, from what I saw, every single Southampton chance owed itself to incompetent defending.
In their match report, The Telegraph criticised our “showboating” on a couple of chances. Perhaps I missed them on the highlights, but I thought our attacking play was pretty decent on the whole. The final stats showed we had 66% of possession and an remarkable 12 shots on target.
However good you are, there are days when you come up against teams at the bottom of the league with a keeper in inspired form. Then you rely on your defence to keep things tight up the other end. There lies the difference between us and Chelsea and even to a lesser extent Man United.
As for the Van Persie red-card, he was very stupid to make that tackle when he’d already been booked. But at the same time I don’t think we should be too hard on him – they were silly offences but clearly not, in my opinion, malicious. From what I could see on TV, they were the sign of a player trying too hard rather than one who had completely lost his self control through frustration. He needs to learn a) that while he’s right in thinking blatant obstruction is acceptable in England, sticking your hand in a guy’s face isn’t and that b) a risky tackle, no matter how well intentioned, is a risky tackle. So don’t make them.
Pushing the ref
Now there are also a couple of lessons to be learned today about how the press report Arsenal. We know Van Persie was sent-off deservedly. But so was Prutton for Southampton – for two reckless tackles (one of which has cost us Robert Pires for a few games it appears). I’m not one for trying to incriminate other players, but surely few people could have missed him quite clearly man handling the referee out the way as he sought to confront the linesman after his quite correct decision.
I can’t help feeling that had it been Van Persie doing this, holidays would have been cancelled and shifts extended long into the night as newspapers put together a special commemorative edition of the day an Arsenal player went psycho with the ref. Instead, in the same The Telegraph report, the incident merits just a single paragraph and a final sentence at the end of the story.
Meanwhile, Van Persie’s red card takes up the first four and a half paragraphs of the match report and a further two paragraphs further into the piece. Sure, the big teams make more interesting copy, but you can’t help feeling that if a player was ever going to manhandle a referee, his best bet of escaping censure would be to do it against a 10 man Arsenal side.
Phil Neville
Whilst I’m on a discipline rant, I feel obliged to pay tribute to Phil Neville. Don’t get me wrong – I hate the twat, but you can only respect the way he yesterday amassed his 60th yellow card for Manchester United and yet has never once been sent-off. And looking at yesterday’s particular incident, it’s not just that he’s a lucky bugger, but he’s also very, very clever.
Like so many times before he went into the book for a shoving match with an opposition player. The truth is that his shoves to the player’s chest were as likely to cause injury as either Jose Reyes or Dennis Bergkamp last week. And yet he didn’t make the mistake of raising his hands and so received only a yellow card.
His record really is quite outstanding: He’s amassed the 60 yellows in 380 appearances. Contrast this with Dennis, who has accrued just 39 bookings from 620 appearances and yet has also received four red cards. Or Sol Campbell who in 480 games has received just 26 yellows, but also four reds. Look at Patrick Vieira – he’s been sent-off ten times for Arsenal. If memory serves me correct 8 were for two bookable offences. So whilst Neville has never once crossed the tightrope in 60 games, Paddy has fallen foul eight times in 96 games. Even his brother Gary has received fewer bookings from more games (51 from 467) and yet received two reds. Only Paul Scholes (a remarkable 86 bookings in 453 games) comes close – he’s got one red card.
I know all of these stats are a bit anal and should probably be saved for a day when I haven’t written loads already, but sod it. It’s about time we learnt how to be more like Phil Neville. Sure, get in a scrap, have a push, but don’t end up with a bloody six game suspension between two players for something as pathetic as what we did last week.
Where we’re at
Well really, I want Chelsea to lift the Carling Cup this afternoon. I know we’re meant to hate them and all that, but I’m just getting a little concerned that United are catching up on them in the league. And nobody in their right mind should want that scenario. So come on Chelsea and get your confidence back for the title run-in.
As for us, we go to Sheffield United on Tuesday in what could be termed shit street. Our defence is quite frankly, very messy. The goalkeeper is going walk about, the right backs been dropped, the central defenders aren’t really that good and the one decent centre-back available has been moved out to right-back in a move that would make most men a little pissed-off. But then again this is Kolo and knowing him he’ll buckle down and simply show that he’s happy to play wherever the boss puts him.
As for the rest: Edu’s injured, Pires is injured and Reyes, Dennis and Van Persie are all banned. The good news is that Jeremie Aliadiere was on the bench yesterday and appears to be back in contention right on cue. Now were he to answer our striking problems by playing at Brammell Lane on Tuesday some might ridiculously argue that he’d only compound them by hobbling off injured after five minutes. With my hands touching wood and my laptop balanced on a wooden chest, I’m going to say that this just won’t happen. Definitely not.
Now as for the team, I guess the question in defence is whether Lauren returns and Kolo shifts across. We’ll see. We could just bloody well play Stuart Taylor. But sadly for reasons beyond me I don’t see that happening. In midfield, expect Paddy and Flamini to play, with Ljungberg and Henry presumably starting too. (I’m presuming Arsene doesn’t see this as the ideal game to rest him). Then it’s anyone’s guess. I reckon it will be Clichy out left and then either Cesc in right midfield in which case Freddie would go up front, or Aliadiere up front, in which case Freddie returns to the right of midfield. It’s also possible that Manuel Eboue could start too I guess.
Anyway that’s almost it. But just one thing: for anyone longing for Matthew Upson to, he succeeded in giving away not one, but two penalties in Birmingham’s defeat at Palace yesterday.
25 FEBRUARY 2005 22:00GMTSo how much is Patrick Vieira really to blame?
After the trauma of midweek, it seems strange that we’ve got a game at Southampton tomorrow lunchtime. It’s the first time in months we’ve played before United and Chelsea, but it all seems a little futile at the moment. That’s all probably all to due with the crisis mentality going round Highbury, with the club getting kicked all over the place by the press.
It’s probably worth throwing my thoughts about Patrick Vieira, a guy who’s taken a fair bit of criticism in some quarters over the past few days. I’m happy to admit that Paddy’s not been at his best this season but I’m less convinced by arguments that criticise his commitment and those that single him out for our failings this season.
Rather than commitment, I would focus more on a lack of concentration and focus. The fact is that he’s done a lot of good things this season, scored some good goals and also put in some good performances. Never was this more in evidence than the Bayern game. Whilst some admonished his contribution, other newspapers highlighted him as our principle driving force.
So for me, he’s still doing a lot of what the Paddy we know has always done – but his game also contains far more errors than usual and as a result we’re suffering. On the second point, however bad Paddy may have been in some people’s minds, we can’t cite this is as the simple explanation for why we haven’t achieved as we’d have liked this season. Throughout the side, experienced players simply haven’t performed to the level they’d have liked to. And its not just because of Paddy.
Vieira has also had his style of captaincy contrasted unfavourably with that of his predecessor, Tony Adams. I’m the first to admit that on the face of it Adams appeared the more natural leader than Vieira, but its worth remembering that Adams’ Arsenal didn’t exactly set the Champions League on fire, irrespective of whether they were less experienced.
It’s also worth remembering that for all our supposed fragility and foreignness, Vieira’s Arsenal were the first side to have the resilience to go a whole season unbeaten. He has also won the FA Cup as captain.
And whilst critics like to suggest that Adams would never have let himself become caught up in a transfer saga with Real Madrid, its worth remembering that Paddy would never have let himself become involved in even half the disruptive scrapes that Adams got himself into. So while I think criticism of his performances are legitimate, a little perspective is worthwhile.
One of the main Vieira critics has been Tony Cascarino, who used his Times column to draw a comparison between Vieira’s style and captaincy and that of Roy Keane. In it he lays into Dennis’ refusal to fly, saying that were Keane in charge he’d say: ““You don’t like flying? Well, I don’t like losing. Get on the plane!” Which would have been the sure fire way to ensure Dennis sailed off into his retirement that little bit sooner.
Cascarino also reports that Keane said to Vieira: “By the way, if you were that good you’d be playing for Real Madrid.” A little rich from a player who went from Forest to United and then lived off the sales of prawn sandwiches for the rest of his career, never daring to try foreign climbs.
Talking of violence, Jose Reyes received his expected 3 match ban for the finger slap against Sheffield United on Wednesday. Arseblogger pretty much said what needs to be said about this. Yes, Reyes and Dennis were both silly, but there has to be some kind of sliding scale that makes sure that the real perpetrators are punished properly.
As for tomorrow, Southampton have won only three times all season but incredibly have lost only twice at home in 13 games. So it could be tough. We’ll be without Reyes and Dennis, have no Edu, Sol or Hoyte. Ashley Cole should be back but Jeremie Aliadiere is not being rushed in after playing and scoring for the reserves.
Let’s try and look on the bright side a little bit – we’re still in the F.A. Cup and we’re not yet out of the Champions League. We’ve also played well in our past two league games. So let’s get behind the team like the excellent away fans did in Germany on Wednesday. That said, family visiting is going to almost definitely force me to miss tomorrow’s game…
23 FEBRUARY 2005 08:00GMTWhy did Arsene play four out-and-out attackers in Munich?
Anderlecht 3 Bayern Munich 3 Arsenal 1
I wasn’t alive on 22nd April 1970 to watch us lose the first leg of the Fairs Cup final 3-1 in Anderlecht. Had I been, I suspect I’d be feeling a serious sense of déjà vu this morning.
On that night we were 3-0 down with just minutes left when substitute Ray Kennedy plundered a late consolation. Famously, a week later we secured a 3-0 win thanks to goals from Eddie Kelly, John Sammels and John Radford and famously lifted our first European trophy.
It’s a romantic image isn’t it? Imagine if this Arsenal side could emulate their predecessors and secure passage into the quarter finals of the Champions League 2005 with their own famous comeback. Sadly, the current reality is pretty bleak.
So what of last night? Well, being 3-0 down after 65 minutes was harsh but no harsher than we know a tight Champions League game can be if you make three errors. The first two inevitably came from defensive cock-ups. As it happened they were individual mistakes by Kolo Toure but really they were symptomatic of a back line whose confidence and trust in each other is completely shattered. There was nothing new in these goals – just the realisation that our defence in its current guise is to an extent, shambolic.
The mistake for the third goal was far more interesting and illustrated perfectly I thought where Arsene had got things wrong last night. When Jens could only flick at a Bayern cross their man came in unmarked at the far post to volley home. Ideally, he’d have been tracked by our left midfielder, Jose Reyes. But with Jose left and Pires right we weren’t really expecting much defensive help from out wide, were we?
Sure, it wasn’t the first time we’d played with Henry, Reyes, Pires and Freddie from the start. But normally Fred is on the right and provides some help to the central midfield pair. With him being up front we had two out and out attackers (Pires and Reyes) on the left and right of midfield for what was always going to be a very tight Champions League away game against a hard working side. We’ve had those two running the wings before but usually against far inferior opposition and usually at Highbury.
I’m no tactical expert, but I can’t help thinking that its possible to have too many attackers on the pitch - to the extent that there are not enough people to make sure they actually get the ball. I sometimes feel we’re too gung ho in making countless attacking substitutions when we’re behind and my instinct is to feel the same this morning.
We seemed to struggle to get hold of the ball and keep it. Would it not have been wiser to have played Flamini instead of Reyes or Pires? Would we have been sturdier at the back and better at retaining the ball when we ventured forward? Flamini may not have the exotic skills of the other two but neither does he nosebleed when he goes forward. And we would have looked a hell of sturdier.
I’ll put it this way: How many other teams would have played four out-and-out attackers away to Bayern in a first-leg?
For the record, though I’m not convinced we deserved to score, 3-0 would have been very harsh. And it was good for Kolo that he made up for the miss by scoring the goal. We’ve got to remember that this result, though bad, is better than a 2-0 defeat.
22 FEBRUARY 2005 07:40GMTDo we need to score twice in Munich tonight?
I think our chances of getting past Bayern may rest on us scoring twice tonight. It’s a big ask, but if we don’t I fear we’ll leave ourselves very exposed come the second leg at Highbury. If you’re expecting us to draw 0-0 in Munich and win 1-0 at Highbury in a mirror of what we used to do to teams like Torino a decade ago, forget it.
The fact is we’re leaking goals at the moment. If we only manage to score none or one tonight then we’ll be stuffed as soon as the Germans score at Highbury. It’s exactly what happened against Chelsea last season, when we had to play the final 40 minutes of the game in limbo, knowing that conceding one more would put the tie beyond us.
Of course a 1-0 win would be better than a 3-3 draw but we shouldn’t make the same mistake as the Chelsea game and think that 1-1 is good enough.
Talking of Chelsea, watching live their quadrouple dream end was quite fun. It’s probably fair to say their lucky streak ended with a pretty sudden jolt when Wayne Bridge broke his ankle just 60 seconds after Jose Mourinho had used up all three of Chelsea’s subs in one sudden throw. So they spent the final 44 minutes playing with ten men and injury time with 9 men after the sending off of Carlo Cudicini.
Glenn Johnson went in goal. Having played an absolute stinker it was like a harking back to school days when the shit player used to get told to go between the sticks. He actually made an alright save from the free-kick.
Newcastle for their part are a very weird club. The team, truth be told would be better suited to St James Park, Exeter than their magnificent Tyneside home. And very strangely none of the players came over to the fans at the end of the game, despite having just become the first team to score against and beat Chelsea since Noah’s Ark. As one fan said to me: “We hate the board, we hate the manager, we hate the players but we love the club”.
And in other news, Jose Reyes has been charged with violent conduct following his finger slap against Sheffield United. Now, Jose is most definitely guilty of stupid conduct, but violent conduct? Give me a break. There was nothing violent about what he did. At best it was ungentlemanly conduct. And whilst we’re on the subject, I’ve got sod all idea why Jose Reyes removed his gloves at half-time but you’ve got to think that having been filmed wearing gloves for 45 minutes, removing them was hardly going to send the football world into a fit of complete confusion.
Dennis has also submitted an appeal for his red card, though if precedent this season is anything to go by, the offender doesn’t tend to get the benefit of the doubt in cases which aren’t clear cut.
Reyes will probably end up with a three game ban, which will further illustrate the complete stupidity of the FA’s punishment system where really dangerous offences are treated as seriously as an absolute non entity. Their time would frankly be far better spent calling in Cesc Fabregas and explaining why you can’t put in tackles like the one he made on Saturday.
As you’ve probably heard, if we’re successful against the Blades it will be a visit to the Reebok and the charming Sam Allardyce. But first tonight. Let’s hope we’re all up for it.
And let’s hope that Jens keeps his head. Please.
20 FEBRUARY 2005 11:55Arsenal conceded a goal direct from a throw-in
In spite of being labelled as “eminently sensible” elsewhere, I feel obliged to make a confession. If my memory serves me correctly, the disallowed Sheffield United goal came from a throw-in. Now seeing as you can’t be offside from a throw-in, the goal clearly wasn’t disallowed for offside. And so, truth be told, my analysis in yesterday’s report of that incident is complete rubbish. (see below)
Now only Manuel Almunia will know whether or not he would have saved it had the whistle not gone. But either way, it does throw up one very interesting point: We conceded a goal direct from a throw in, which is laughable, absurd and shambolic. How, how, how can our defending be in such a state that first division sides are tossing the ball into the box and nodding it straight in? And it wasn’t a one off either. Earlier in the game their guy almost ghosted in and scored from another throw from the other side. They're not even flicking it on like Wimbledon used to do. At any level of football it would be a complete farce.
The truth is their throw-ins caused more trouble than our corners. That tells you that for all the brilliance of our team (and there still is a hell of a lot in the attacking third), we could be a damn sight better. Which is exactly what Lauren says in this particularly good interview from Friday’s Mirror.
He says: "We have not been consistent, definitely. That is the difference between last year and this year. We know that we can beat any team and score a lot of goals but as a team we have conceded far too many.
“The year before last, Arsene said that we were scoring enough goals to win the title but had conceded too many and that if we put that right we would be champions again - and we were.
"But this season we've conceded all those goals again. It's strange the way we have done that, so many from set-pieces when you shouldn't let in goals. As a defender you've got to take responsibility for that and feel disappointed."
Which I think sums it all up quite nicely.
In other news, the press have decided Jose Reyes could get a ban as well for his role in the Bergkamp sending-off incident. I think there were two incidents, one of which looked like nothing much and was very hard to see anyway. Were he to get into trouble for the other it would constitute the most pathetic FA charge ever known to man. He literally brushed his fingers against the guy’s chin. Stupid, but had the referee seen it in open play he would have cautioned Jose and told him to stop being such a girl.
If the FA were actually interested in doing anything about the match then they could look at the challenge that went in on Eboue as he played the ball back to Almunia. That was a really nasty piece of work – right down the back of his leg and very deliberate. Even the Cesc tackle would be more worthy of investigation. Only Arsenal could possibly accrue a cumulative six game ban for that kind of incident. It’s like Old Trafford in 2003 – we got eight games between us. And we didn’t even manage anything more than a bit of pushing and the odd monkey jump on Van Nistelrooy.
I’m meant to be sitting with the Geordies for Newcastle v Chelsea this afternoon but have just received a text message telling me the city is under 2 inches of snow. Which I would have known myself were I not still in bed at midday. Anyway, the game is apparently still on, just. And the town has the joy of entertaining 5,000 Chelsea fans. Which nobody needs.
19 FEBRUARY 2005 15:02Good game: Bergkamp lets himself down, Arsenal battle and Sheff United equalise.
Arsenal 1 Sheffield United 1
Blimey, what a cup tie.
The major incidents were Dennis Bergkamp being sent-off after about half an hour, a disallowed goal for Sheffield United, a poor tackle by Cesc, a Robert Pires goal after 78 minutes and a last minute equaliser from the penalty spot after a handball by Senderos. I’ll deal with each in turn:
Dennis: The BBC completely cocked up their analysis of this incident, focusing on a collision between Dennis and Cullip a few seconds before the incident, rather than what had actually infuriated the Arsenal players, which was a possible stamp on Cesc’s head.
Now, the scuffling that ensued was all really a load of nothing. Dennis poked the guy in the chest, got in his face and found himself sent-off. Had the referee had a perfect view of the incident it wouldn’t have been a red card but the fact is that if you take justice into your own hands like that and get involved in a melee you run the risk of getting the decision against you.
So a tad unfortunate yes but certainly stupid to get involved in the first place. You’ve got to let the referee sort out these things. Strangely, I think I'm right in saying that three of Dennis' four red cards as an Arsenal player have come in the FA Cup. Reyes was also guilty of flicking one of their player’s faces during the incident – silly and risky but a nothing incident. As for the alleged stamp – the speed of the incident meant that the replays were in truth inconclusive.
The disallowed goal: On this one the BBC completely missed the blatant offside in the middle, which is why I believe the whistle was blown. I’m sure I heard it very early in the move and I think Almunia did too judging by his quarter hearted attempts to get the ball. Obviously, it was not a foul by the player who headed it on.
Cesc’s tackle: It was reckless and it probably should have been a red card. We don’t want to see Arsenal players make challenges like that and fortunately we rarely do – Ashley Cole’s at Leicester in December 2003 being the last example. The one thing I will say in the young Spaniard’s defence is that just because a tackle is reckless, it is not necessarily deliberately designed to injure a player. And that is why I’d say what Cesc did should be categorised alongside tackles such as Jamie Redknapp’s against Everton earlier this season as opposed to Van Nistelrooy’s deliberate attempt to put Ashley Cole out of action last October.
Pires’ goal: A typical Arsenal one, intricate passing, good work by Reyes, a shot from Flamini and a tap in from Pires.
Sheffield United penalty: There’s no doubt – it was a handball by Senderos and a spot kick. But rather than follow the analysis on the BBC who said that they’d been banging away and eventually found a way through, I’d say that it actually looked like the only way the visitors would score. We were actually looking relatively tight at the back and this was just one of those things that happens.
Conclusion: A draw was probably a fair result today. We didn’t start the game well but actually got much better after the sending-off and created some good chances. We also looked much more solid in the second half and were dealing with a lot of high balls into our box well. Almunia was collecting things, Senderos was heading out and he and Toure looked like they were pretty much on each other’s wavelength.
Up front our attackers were causing their defence quite a few problems and I thought we had a blatant penalty when Jose was brought down in the second half. It wasn’t the result we wanted and it won’t help our mood ahead of Bayern on Tuesday but we have to remember that these things happen and that on the whole our record against sides outside the Premiership is remarkable.
It would have been easy to crumble after the sending off and to have lost the game. But we kept at it, plugged away and almost won it. I’ve said it a million times before, but the fact is that if you don’t score against Arsenal they will normally score against you. And so it proved.
It creates an unwanted replay but these things happen. Credit to Sheffield United as well. Like all three Championship sides we’ve played at Highbury this season they gave it a real go.
We’ve got a funny history with them – things never ever seem to be easy. And of course our last defeat to a lower league side was at Bramell Lane under Bruce Rioch. So it will be a tough replay with a full house baying for blood. We’ll just have to roll our sleeves up, show our professionalism and play our way through it if we want a spot in the quarter-finals.
Playa ratings may be up later.
18 FEBRUARY 2005 23:15Merson, Keane, the foreign 16 and a wee bit about Sheffield United
So I don’t post for a few days and the football world goes absolutely mad. Where to start?
Perhaps with Paul Merson. Now am I the only one who thinks there something very wrong about Paul Merson bemoaning a lack of opportunities given to Jermaine Pennant and David Bentley whilst Cesc walks into the team.
I’m not going to document Paul Merson’s various problems but while I admit some were medical, he himself has admitted that others (cocaine) were not. So it seems a bit funny that he is lecturing Arsene Wenger in light of the fact that: Jermaine Pennant has been caught drink driving twice in as many years. And whilst he’s done well at Birmingham, he didn’t set the light on fire at Leeds last season nor at Arsenal this. And in light of David Bentley being suspended for a month or so by Norwich manager Nigel Worthington for ill discipline earlier this season. And in any case nobody has said his chance has gone at Arsenal.
On the other hand, the only way Cesc has hit the headlines off the field is by possibly being responsible for hitting Fergie with a ham and pineapple. Which I count as a major plus.
I know I’ve honed in on a couple of examples. But it’s still worth passing a casual glance through the England team and seeing why they might not appeal so much.
I’d also point out that when Peter bloody Hill-Wood of all people is having to take the role of liberal explaining how the world has moved on, you know certain people are living in the past. Such as the Daily Mail, who this week ran a double page spread in their news section on the 16 who played against Palace under the headline: “Meet the away team”. Which seems a little off to me.
Anyway, various Arsenal blogs have pointed out with great eloquence that we’re not in a financial position to spend £30 million on the likes of Wayne Rooney or even £10 million on Scott Parker. Arseblog brilliantly pointed out that Liam Chilvers’ assertion that he had unfairly had to play second fiddle to Stathis Tavlaridis is absolute crap in light of the former now playing in League 1 and the latter in the top league in France. I’d also like to point out that Arsene didn’t seem to have any problem in playing Bould, Nigel, Adams, Seaman, Dixon and Mad Dog for as long as he could.
Managers have been fairly split among who’s side to take. Sam Allardyce has predictably taken the prize for top tosser by saying that if he had the money of a Mourinho or Wenger he’d only buy English players and would go out and snap up Gerrard, Owen, Beckham etc. Clearly he’s not aware of the slight bank balance differences between Mr Abramovich and Mr Hill Wood. And what a surprise he leaves out the world’s richest club in his analogy. And to think he plays golf with Fergie.
Personally, I don’t give a flying fuck where the Arsenal players come from, so long as they wear the shirt with pride. And the argument that you don’t get traditional British steel with foreign players is absolute bullshit. After all, it was our bunch of money grabbing, fair weather imports who had the resilience to go 49 games unbeaten. So bollocks to that. Yes, it’s true that there has been the odd player such as Stepanovs who has been given too much air time but I hardly see that many ex Wenger protégés causing great waves elsewhere. Sure, Upson is better than Cygan, but really we should probably have a player there who’s better than both of them. And for those who say the England national side suffer from too many foreigners: there is nothing wrong with the England side at the moment. Except that they're managed by a guy with no clue whatsoever how to get the best out of an excellent set of players.
Speaking of Fergie, his loyal captain Roy Keane has been advocating the wearing of anti diving wristbands, bringing up Cole’s dive earlier this season whilst ignoring those of Granny Fucker and Horseface. Unfortunately Arsenal Times pretty much beat me to suggesting a special thighband that players would wear to guard against being brutally assaulted by the self righteous thug whenever his temper gets the better of him. It would be good to see.
We play Sheffield United tomorrow in a rerun of the Semi-Final of two years ago and the fourth round five years ago. I haven’t the time to give a preview now but as ever the great fear is that at some point somebody has to end Arsene’s immaculate record against lower division opposition. I’m off to Newcastle v Chelsea on Sunday and will be sitting in the Gallowgate end. I’m thinking of wearing a sign saying: “Ignore the accent, I’m not a Chelsea fan. Trust me.”
I could well update the site after the game tomorrow.
14 FEBRUARY 2005 23:15Arsenal 5 Palace 1: Our season in a nutshell + playa ratings
Arsenal 5 Crystal Palace 1
Tonight’s game encapsulated everything we’ve seen over the past 27 games. Our defence as ever looked shaky and lacking in confidence. Palace went for the jugular and we struggled. Cygan fluffed his header, Vieira didn’t clear and Dougie Freedman had a shot at goal. Then Freedman was inches away from converting a cross when he got in between Toure and Lauren. And to top it all off we almost conceded one of the most ridiculous own goals ever when Jens allowed a Clichy back pass to slip under his foot. The ball inched tantalisingly towards the line before our goalkeeper managed to clear.
The fragility continued throughout the game: Lauren followed the ball and not the man at 1-0 and allowed Freedman to slice wide. The same attacker breached our defence with ease just moments into the second half and fired just wide. Patrick Vieira’s absent minded tackle brought down Andy Johnson for a clear penalty to give Palace their consolation. And with only seconds left Gael Clichy’s header back to Jens fell short and put Johnson in.
The above is not a criticism – just an acknowledgment of how and why we’ve struggled this season.
And what of the attack?
As ever, it was simply superb. Frankly, I’m left dumbstruck when people criticise it. For me, it’s the attacking equivalent of Chelsea’s defence and quite rightly nobody complains about them. 2.3 goals a game is a simply superb return.
And forget what Alan Smith was saying about Palace’s generous defending tonight. Like countless sides before them, they were worn down by our unceasing attacking. It’s worth bearing in mind that despite our generosity at the back, we had 71% of possession in the first half – a remarkable statistic.
As far as the goals went, they were all very nice. Edu played in Reyes for the first and he crossed low for Dennis who slotted in neatly. It was mentioned on SKY, but it looked touch and go offside to me. The second was a peach from Jose – a wicked left footed shot from 25 yards that arrowed into the side netting. For anyone who hasn’t seen it but has a video of Stefan Schwarz’s first goal for us against Omonia Nicosia (?) in 1994 then play it and use it as a guide.
I was just getting the feeling that it might be one of those days where we win but Henry can’t score and gets frustrated when he well and truly put me in my place. From a short corner with Reyes he cut in and fired a missile that arrowed from 25 yards into the Palace net.
Amazingly, we kept up the pressure after the break and got a fourth when Henry played in Vieira who walked the ball home. He’s taken a lot of flak this season and a fair bit has been justified. But he’s also scored six goals already, which besides being a personal record is also a pretty decent return for a midfielder by any standards.
After the Palace consolation, a lovely cross field ball from Jose, good work by Dennis and a fine finish by Henry rounded off a very satisfying win. In particular, Jose Reyes had a good game. Some will say he owed us one but I’d rather just focus on how nice it was to see him back at his free flowing best. More on that tomorrow.
Playa ratings are to the right.
13 FEBRUARY 2005 12:00Reyes, Henry, Arsene on political science and all foreigners are divers.
So the ‘big’ news of the past few days has been Jose Reyes being tricked by a radio prankster into declaring a desire to leave Arsenal and head for the sunnier climbs of Madrid. There’s not a lot to be said that hasn’t already been covered by good pieces on Arseweb and Arseblog.
Essentially, he’s a young boy, he’s homesick, he’s also in a country which if we’re honest isn’t really as nice as his own and he’s not scoring goals. I’m sure he didn’t say much in the conversation that Arsene Wenger wasn’t already very aware. The important thing is to get behind the boy against Palace tomorrow night and show how much we enjoy seeing him play. And if he wants stewed oxtail with clams, then so be it. I’ll even eat it with him.
Elsewhere there isn’t much else – though Thierry Henry has done a radio interview saying he wants to stay with Arsenal forever if we’ll have him and the boss says he’s hopeful Ashley Cole will stay, but admits it won’t be because we’re offering more money than Chelsea.
In the same article, he also gives Sven a quick lesson in Political Science, responding to the England manager’s in no way self interested claim that democracy entitled players to do exactly what they want. Our boss said: “Even in democracy there are rules because, without them, there is chaos." Were I still a politics student, I would endeavour to use that phrase in every essay I wrote for ever more. I encourage any politics students reading this site to use that sentence and cite the boss accordingly.
United play City in about an hour. It will be interesting to see how they respond to Chelsea winning yesterday. It was a good result for the Blues, though they were given an enormous boost by the absolute sheer idiocy of James Beattie, sent-off after eight minutes for head-butting William Gallas.
Beattie succeeded in making an even bigger tit out of himself after the match when he made himself out to be the victim of an injustice. But he didn’t make half as big a tit of himself as David Moyes, who said: “I have seen the video. I have never heard of anybody butting somebody from behind while you are running after them.”
No, nor have I. And that’s because it’s a sure fire way to get yourself sent-off. You can’t even invoke the Fergieism that ‘I thought the other player would butt me if I didn’t get in first.’ Moyes continued, pretty shamefully in my opinion, by invoking the tired old diving jonny foreigner line. He said: “I've been a centre-half in my time and I would have been ashamed to have gone down as easily as that. Not in a million years would John Terry have gone down in the same way.” It's a cheap, myopic excuse.
9 FEBRUARY 2005 18:57Warning: update contains references to an England friendly. Viewers may find some scenes disturbing.
England 0 Holland 0
The only people to come out with any credit from last night’s England game was the BBC, who for the second friendly in succession actually had the balls to say how crap the game was.
I’d give a detailed tactical analysis of the game if a) I had the expertise to do so, b) I hadn’t got very bored early in the second half and c) England actually had tactics to analyse. So no analysis then. I will however say that Sven’s attempts to suggest that things are on the up by virtue of the fact we’d improved on the Madrid performance was one of the most pathetic excuses I’ve ever seen in football.
On the issue of where Andy Johnson should have played, I’ll phrase a very, very simple question. It goes like this: Is Andy Johnson one of the top ten English right midfielders? Assuming your answer is no, why was he then put on the right of midfield? It’s a crudely simple way of looking at it but still more sophisticated than a lot of what went on tonight.
It's not even that we're a bad side. We're clearly not. It's just very, very dull watching us.
As for Arsenal news, Jose Reyes’ agent has apparently been suggesting that the young Andalucian may fancy a move to Madrid. The story has been brewing for a few days following initial reports of the player being homesick. So there may be some truth in it all, though the rumours of Owen coming in exchange seem somewhat tenuous at the moment. We shall have to see.
Other than that, there’s not a lot to say. At all. To anyone. International friendly weeks with England are that bad.
8 FEBRUARY 2005 18:57Ferguson's comical headbutt defence + the Cole saga part 967.
Picture this: Arsenal v United last week. Patrick Vieira head-butts Gary Neville in full view of referee Graham Poll and is sent-off. Facing the inevitable barrage of questions after the match, Arsene says: “Patrick thought Gary Neville was about to headbutt him, so he put his head forward for protection.”
Can you imagine the excitement? The ridicule dished out on the football chat shows, the commemorative t-shirts on Football365, the columnists telling us how French his absurd defence of his player was.
And they’d be quite right really wouldn’t they? It would be more farcical than almost any excuse from a manager we’ve ever heard before. But why haven’t we had the ridicule, t-shirts and columnists proffering their thoughts on the following comments by Fergie after last week’s game. According to the print version of Monday’s Daily Mirror (and seemingly nowhere else), his thoughts went along the lines of: “Mikael thought Freddie Ljungberg was about to headbutt him, so he put his head forward for protection.”
Just a thought.
With all the fun of international week, the only real Arsenal news at the moment is that the Ashley Cole saga rumbles on. The former FA compliance officer someone Bean says that Chelsea won’t be docked points, which seems fairly obvious.
I’m beginning to have mixed feelings over all of this. Initially I wasn’t too bothered by the whole affair and felt that a slapped wrist for Chelsea would do. But I do agree with people such as Standard journalist Michael Hart that the Blues’ approach to the whole affair seems to be getting disturbingly more arrogant. In fact, it’s got all the fingerprints of the universally loved Peter Kenyon, the world’s leading specialist in joining a mega, mega rich brand and taking credit for it achieving some measure of success. I don’t want to see points docked but then again it’s a fair question to ask what other options are available that would actually make an impact.
The problem is that this week it might be the relatively miner issue of tapping up one of our players (and it is miner really) but if it goes unchecked then next time it could be something much more and we could have another Manchester United on our hands.
Meanwhile, The Times claim that Chelsea offered Cole a massive amount of money to sign on during their meeting at the hotel. Which figures being the world’s richest club.
6 FEBRUARY 2005 18:57Bergkamp's assist up there with his greatest moments and just what is the Ashley Cole story?
Thierry Henry said yesterday’s third goal was one of the best he’s ever seen Arsenal score. I think something more needs to be said about it because though everyone seems to have acknowledged that it was a brilliant goal and have noted the initial set-up play of Henry himself and Ashley Cole’s brilliant first time finish, they seem to have missed something else in there.
For me, Dennis Bergkamp’s ball to Cole was one of the most exquisite assists I’ve seen in many years of watching football. It wasn’t just the fact that he played it first time. It wasn’t even the fact that the original ball from Henry (good as it was) came at such an awkward height. It wasn’t just the fact that changed the direction of the ball so effortlessly. Instead it was that he had played the ball absolutely perfectly into Cole’s run: it was perfectly directed, perfectly weighted and perfectly synchronised with the defender’s run.
It was still a top finish, but Dennis had seen the goal exactly as it panned out the instant Henry released the ball and Cole started to gallop. Pure perfection.
It doesn’t need me to say that other than the third we were pretty awesome all round, particularly in the first half. I’m not worried about the second half: anyone who knows Arsenal will know that when we’ve got three by half-time the most we’ll go on and score is four – and the odds are we’ll concede one too. With three points guaranteed early on, it was the first time in months we’d been able to relax and try a few tricks as we all know Arsenal love to do.
I’ll put playa ratings up tonight or tomorrow morning, but I’ll just say that I actually thought Jose did quite well. Sure, some of the execution was off but he still seemed lively and I’m beginning to think more and more (and wonder if Arsene is too) that maybe he’ll turn out to be a left winger rather than a striker. I also thought Edu and Jens did well on their returns, though I want to see a few more games before making judgment on how their presence affects the team overall. Certainly I think a Jens Lehman on form is our best option in goal (and not half as bad as many people make out).
Finally, it seems the Premier League are now set to investigate the whole Ashley Cole row after an official complaint from Arsenal. Meanwhile, the Sunday Mirror claim Cole is definitely headed to Stamford Bridge in the summer. The whole thing is very strange indeed. One thing’s for sure: there’s no smoke without fire and this meeting almost certainly did take place.
I’m not convinced however by the stories saying he’s definitely going. They remind me of the one’s about Paddy in the summer that strangely seemed to forget the concept of a transfer fee being agreed. And considering Cole’s youth, his ability, the fact he has 2 years left on his contract and Chelsea’s immense spending power, I’d be surprised if we didn’t squeeze more than the £20 million out of them. The one thing the story demonstrates is the absurdity of UEFA’s newly proposed transfer reforms in that it will only strengthen Chelsea and United's iron grip in the transfer market.
Regarding the whole complaint issue, I’m confused as to why the Murdoch press (Sun and News of the World) are pursuing Chelsea so vigorously and calling for a points deduction with such ferocity (lining up their various columnists to slam Chelsea’s behaviour). It just doesn’t seem to add up: perhaps they really hate Chelsea and all the money they have. Perhaps they’re hoping that a points deduction will put United back into the title picture. Perhaps it's because Peter Kenyon's such a twat. I don’t know. It just seemed very strange that the whole of their front page on Friday (even in places as far away from London as Newcastle, where I’m currently based) was given over to the story.
From Ashley Cole's point of view I suspect he'd like to play in Arsenal colours on Chelsea money, which is fair enough. But as far as the media coverage goes, there’s something going on. I’m just not sure what it is. Are you? If so, e-mail me using the address up the top).
Update: Chelsea 0 Man City 0. Funny how things suddenly change when you play after your rivals, isn't it? Expect the media to go into overdrive hyping up the chances of United being let in. Of course things return to normal next week - Chelsea play lunhtime Saturday, United 24 hours later and us not until the Monday night. It's a predictable story. United's title odds are now down to 6-1 and our's to 12-1. Before the Villa game we were quoted at 25-1!
Can we still catch Chelsea? That depends on whether you think United can. The points difference between us and United is nothing really, just one more point than we led them by before the game. After Tuesday the far greater gap was between the level of our respective performances and the confidence each side had. If we have got our confidence and performance level back (and we have actually had 2.5 very good games out of 3) then the two points shouldn't make much of a difference.
Either way, Chelsea need to collapse and one of the other two have to put some brilliant form together. Were we both to do it, the gap is currently small enough that we could still edge United out. Were the gap with Chelsea to stay unchanged but the one with United to lengthen, then we would be completely stuffed. I'm not saying I think we're going to win the league, because I don't believe that to be the case. But we should remember that the important thing for us at the moment is getting our performances right and not worrying about the 2 points.
4 FEBRUARY 2005Don't boo Edu
It was strange on Wednesday night – half of me wanted Chelsea to beat Blackburn. I know we’re supposed to hate them and I know we’ve got good reason to, but part of me does have a little admiration for what they’re doing at the moment. And more to the point it stops United.
But back to Chelsea - their clean sheet record is simply sensational. Robben and co are rightly getting a lot of credit for their dazzling displays up front. But while it’s true that they’ve hit some opponents for four or five, their attack has been no more consistent than ours. We’ve still scored six more goals than them. We’ve failed to score twice. They’ve failed to score three times. We’ve scored just the one on 8 occasions, they’ve also done it on 8.
But the great difference here is that they’ve won each of those 8 games 1-0. 24 points from 24 – an extraordinary record. Had we done the same we’d be just four points behind but instead we’re 13 off the pace. Of course you have to defend as a team and so attacks should take their share of credit or blame for defensive records, but whatever way you look at it, Chelsea’s defending simply outstanding. I suspect things won’t be so easy next year once they’ve been found out a little, but as one time defensive connoisseurs we should appreciate it and give Mourinho some credit for it.
As far as the Ashley Cole thing goes – there is a very clear case for slamming Chelsea for their arrogance and contempt for the rules. But still, Ashley Cole was not forced into this meeting. And whilst he’s perfectly entitled to try and force us to give him an improved contract then was simply not the time to do it. It was foolish and ill judged and did us no favours before the United game.
The bad news ahead of Villa away tomorrow is that injuries to Campbell and Senderos and Kolo being banned are likely to force us into a very inexperience pairing of Cygan and Hoyte at the back. The good news is that Edu is fully fit (as he has been for weeks) and in the squad. This should be a major boost – great as Cesc and Flamini have done (and I’m not just saying that), the tactical and positional experience of a player like Edu is very valuable. His return could even see Paddy playing in central defence.
And to anyone thinking of booing Edu – don’t bother. He’s always given his best for the club, he’s said he’ll give his best if selected, he’s managed to stay largely silent and dignified over the while contract wrangle and he also has every right to move to the Spanish Champions and a higher salary if that’s what he so desires. I think most of us hope a deal can eventually be agreed. Booing him will help neither player nor club.
2 FEBRUARY 2005The United game, their shocking disciplinary record and our defence (or lack of it)
I wrote a very drunken, miserable piece an hour after the game but fortunately was prevented from publishing it due to technical problems. I’ll now say what I wanted to say minus various obscenities.
Firstly, the game: United deserved it. That’s not to say there was a lot in it, just that coming from 2-1 down away from home to win 4-2 is a fair comeback by any standards. We lost for two reasons. In part because we failed to properly attack their goal in the final half an hour. But principally due to our defending. I’ll discuss it in depth below.
In the first half we had some really great passages of play. Led by Dennis, who was on absolute fire, we scored two good goals, could have had more and undoubtedly should have had a penalty. Graham Poll received a fair bit of credit for the way he refereed the game. But he stunk out the place with his decision for Silvestre’s challenge on Pires. As I write this I can feel my blood boiling again at the unjustness of it. All I’ll say is that anyone who doesn’t think United would have got that penalty at Old Trafford needs their head examining. Soon. And Dennis was also level when played through in the first half.
The last big decision of any nature I remember going our way in a United – Arsenal game was an offside not given prior to an Henry goal two years ago. But since then we’ve been continually done over on the big decisions on a never ending number of decisions. Something realy needs to be done about it because whatever good intentions individual refs have, it seems to happen every time.
As for the rest of the discipline: Ashley Cole’s dive was appalling, pathetic and an embarrassment to me as an Arsenal supporter. And I’m not turning on him because of the recent reports of a meeting with Chelsea. It was simply shameful. But United were little better. Giggs resorted to classic kicking, Rooney’s discipline was absolutely shocking and Heinze seemed completely possessed.
United’s discipline
After 28 seconds he quite clearly deliberately obstructed Freddie. When the referee dared to penalise him he and other United players immediately charged towards Poll, incandescent with rage that their classic tactic of deliberate early fouling had been rumbled. It was extraordinary.
There’s very little to say about the Silvestre decision: it was as clear as day. But there is something to be said about Manchester United’s disciplinary record, which despite what you might read, is actually pretty shocking. In their last 26 Premiership games they’ve accrued five red cards and two FA misconduct charges resulting in three game bans, effectively taking their total to seven red cards in the 26 games. That is more than one red card every four games and is as bad if not worse than anything we’ve ever managed.
We on the other hand have gone 48 league games without a red card. Admittedly, Kolo Toure was banned for violent conduct, so in fact our record should read one in 48, still infinitely better than 7 in 26.
Defending
2003-2004: Liverpool (2), Newcastle (2), Spurs (2).
2004-2005: Middlesboro (3), Bolton (2), Spurs (4), Southampton (2), Chelsea (2), Manchester United (4), Manchester United (2), Liverpool (2).
In just three out of 38 games did we concede two goals last season. This year we’ve managed it eight times in just 25 games. There are those who have criticised the attack at times this season. But that’s rubbish: they’re still averaging over two a game. And they’ve scored twice against United (home) and Chelsea, got five at Spurs, four at Everton and also netted against Newcastle (twice) and at Anfield. Only at the Reebok and Old Trafford have we failed to score.
There is some justification in saying that we’ve been hit by injuries and the paucity of our squad. And we know the goalkeeping situation is a mess. But the truth is that the defence just aren’t playing well. I said it a few weeks ago and took a bit of stick over it, but we can’t escape the reality that even when they’re all playing, Kolo, Sol, Lauren and Cole do not look anything like as solid as they were last season.
We’ve lost countless leads in big games. Last night was a classic case in point: two goals at home should be enough to beat Man United. But individual errors from Sol, then Lauren (who got unnecessarily dragged out wide) and Almunia and then Almunia again cost us.
There will be those who will call for wholesale replacements. That’s rubbish. Clearly we need a new goalkeeper and some proper cover at centre-back. But the fact is that Cole, Lauren, Kolo and Sol should constitute a very solid backline. It’s all a bit like the fox in the box argument of a few years ago: the problem turned out to be not that we needed a natural finisher (Jeffers) but that the players we had simply had to finish better.
And now the players we have must go back to the training pitch and remind themselves how they defended their way through an unbeaten season last year until they start defending better.
1 FEBRUARY 2005No time for touchy feely refereeing
With moving house and starting work I haven't yet managed to sort out internet access, so updates are going to be a little sparse for a while.
Anyway, there's not a hell of a lot to be said about tonight's game that hasn't been said before. From a very, very brief scan of the NewsNow pages it doesn't look like anybody on either side has come out with any cracking quotes on the eve of the match. There was a good interview in yesterday's Guardian with Sol Campbell, where he basically said that he hates United as much as we do. He also suggested he wants to end his playing career on the continent, which seems fair enough.
There were also some interesting quotes from both managers who unsurprisingly both think their teams are on the whole clean. The stats show that we've got 30 odd yellows this season and no reds and United have 20 odd yellows and 2 reds. Apparently this puts them in 2nd place in the fair play league and us in 8th. Which seems strange. And I know it's all a bit petty but surely there's a case for including FA disciplinary punishments in the assessment? On this measure we'd have the equivalent of one red card (for Kolo elbowing Shearer) and United would have four, which at an average of one every six league games is about as bad as anything we ever managed. Petty, yes. But for United I'm prepared to be petty.
As far as tonight goes we simply have to play like we did against Newcastle. There's not a lot else to say. They're a pretty good side but I still believe that on our day we're unstoppable, irrespective of whom the opposition is. And that includes United and Chelsea. The problem is that in recent months we've very rarely been 'on our day'. As for the referee: I said before the last game that Mike Riley shouldn't adopt one of those 'touchy, feely, I know it's a big game so I'll let things go' approaches. I said it would only play into the hands of United who would get away with untold deliberate fouls that would go unpunished.
So to Graham Poll I say the same as I said to Riley: don't stand for anything. Sure, I realise this will probably get Paddy and one or two other Gooners a first half caution but in the end it will do far more to stunt United's targeted fouling than our generally hard, fair and occasionally mistimed efforts. It's about to time we gave them a good spanking. Let's hope tonight's the night.
|
Archives: January 2005, December 2004 and the embryonic goodplaya.
Latest playa ratings:
v Palace (5-1) - NEW
Jens: It’s tempting to say that the early back pass cock-up could just as easily have happened to Petr Cech but in truth that would be a lie. He’s simply too cocky and over confident with his kicking – it’s why so many balls get sliced wildly and why we almost conceded a shambolic own goal tonight. Otherwise, he actually did quite well. 6.5
Lauren: Is definitely becoming a better player going forward but was as culpable as anyone for our defensive malaise. 6
Cygan: Didn’t have an awful game but on too many occasions simple long balls forward by Palace became much more serious than they needed to be. 6
Kolo: Got skinned more often than he would have liked and was caught out at times from crosses. But still, we only conceded one. 6.5
Clichy: Did well getting forward, causing a constant menace. Defending was largely competent but seemed to be infected by the general defensive tendency to give the ball away. 6.5
Vieira: Another tricky game to rate from the captain. At times he was sluggish and easily caught in possession. At others, he took a grip on the game and drove the team forward impressively. Got well forward for his goal. 7
Edu: Didn’t have the sudden impact he enjoyed at Villa last week but did well enough and certainly gave us a fair bit of solidity. Good ball to Reyes for the opener. 7
Pires: Seemed to be rewriting the dictionary definition of anonymous for the first 20 or so minutes. Then got more into the game without coming close to hitting top gear. Was unlucky to hit the post in the 2nd half after good work from Reyes. 7
Reyes: His best game in yonks. He looked fearless again, running constantly at the Palace defence and causing a lot of trouble. Good assist for the first, great finish for the second, an assist for the third and a fantastic pass to Dennis to set up the fifth. Great to see him back again. 8.5
Dennis: As ever, he oiled, moulded and sculpted our performance. He also took his goal very well, like he did against Newcastle and United too. And set up Henry for the fifth. 7.5
Henry: Really played very, very well and channelled any frustration about constant offside decisions in exactly the right way. Had seemingly boundless energy to chase back lost causes and put us back on the attack. 8.5
Subs:
Flamini (for Edu 60odd): Solid and composed as ever. 7
Van Persie (for Dennis 80odd): Linked up reasonably well as the game entered its final stages. 7
Fabregas (for Pires 80odd): Settled in comfortably on the right. 7
v Wolves (2-0)
Jens: Whilst a clean sheet is a clean sheet, he had very little to do and looked no more reassuring than previously with his kicking. To be fair, he was also played a high number of over hit back passes today and was not at fault for the one from Flamini that took a wicked bobble off the Highbury surface (which appeared unusually cut-up).6.5
Eboue: Got forward well, hit the bar with a deflected shot and could have had a penalty. Nice work. 8
Clichy: Decent game without being exceptional.7
Sol: Not a lot to do. 7
Cygan: Better than usual. 8
Paddy: Mediocre for much of it truth be told. Got better later on and scored the penalty but for too long his mind didn’t seem in the right place. Sure, Wolves made it difficult by crowding midfield but too often he seemed semi asleep at throw ins and the like. Still, he kept going. 6.5
Flamini: Didn’t show the deftness of touch of the Newcastle game but retained all his normal solidity. And great as Ray Parlour was, watching Boro at the moment suggests that we’ve got an as good, if not better, replacement. 7
Reyes: A couple of good runs, some moments of anonymity and denied a stonewall penalty. Still getting back to form but it definitely seems better than a few weeks ago. 6.5
Freddie: Usual energetic performance without any stand out moments, save his well taken goal. That’s ten for the season now and we’re still in January. Good work Sir. 7
Van Persie: Not his most inspiring game and clearly doesn’t yet have the positional ability of Dennis (who does?) but is improving. 6.5
Henry: Gallic. Went into one of his moods after Riley ruled out his cheeky first half effort. Strutted around for a while, went in for a couple of silly tackles and became frankly self indulgently petulant when a foul was given against him. It’s alright for us to loathe Riley endlessly but our top striker shouldn’t let him affect his game. And the fact is he did. But recovered his composure, was unlucky not to score and set up Freddie in superb fashion. 8
Subs:
Cesc (for Van Persie): Settled in comfortably on the right. 7
Pires (for Reyes): Nice work for the clinching goal. 7
Quincy (for Fred): No time to make an impression.
v Charlton (3-1)
Alumnia: No chance with the goal and didn’t do too much wrong besides one poor fumble from a cross. Still not convinced by his catching techniques. No difficult saves to make6.5
Hoyte: Made the odd error but did well to make sure his old youth team buddy Jerome Thomas had his quietest game in weeks. Managed to get forward a bit more in the second half.7.5
Cole: Still not looking at his best and on a couple of occasions was embarrassed by Rommedahl. But in fairness he wasn’t as sloppy as recently and did get forward well later on. 6.5
Sol: With the exception of one wildly sliced clearance in the first half that Almunia had to save he looked pretty solid and kept Charlton’s clear chances to a minimum. Let’s hope his ankle isn’t too bad. 7
Kolo: Given a bit of grief by Bartlett in the air but stuck to his task well and like Campbell, restricted the number of clear cut chances. 7
Vieira: Watching the game live, I was unconvinced by his first half performance. But having just seen the highlights it seems he got through a lot of work and did what he had to do neatly and efficiently. Set up Fred well for the goal and kept up a good level of performance all the way through.7
Cesc: Lost the odd ball but was generally very sound. Passing was clean and crisp as ever and his touch for the second goal was exquisite by any standards.7.5
Freddie: Took his two goals brilliantly, worked hard and always looked a threat. In good form. 8
Clichy: Seemed to lose the ball cheaply a bit too often but worked hard down the left helping Cole out with nullifying the threat of Rohmedahl and getting forward well. Has tremendous energy which comes in handy at the end of games when opposition players tire.6.5
Henry: Not at his best today but more worrying than the actual performance was the fact that his normal fitness wasn’t there. Had a lovely free-kick cleared off the line.6.5
Van Persie: Still has a tendency to twist and turn once too often. But also holds the ball up brilliantly, moves it well and finished superbly for the third. Should probably be given a real run up front next to Henry. Took his goal like a striker, which is disconcerting coming from an Arsenal player.7.5
Subs:
Pires (for Van Persie 72ish): With the game won he wisely didn’t over exert himself ahead of Man City on Tuesday night. 6.5
Senderos (for Campbell 82ish): Slotted in well on his Premiership debut.7
Pennant (for Fred 86): Didn’t have time to get into the game. 7
v Newcastle (1-0)
Almunia: Our star man tonight. A smart early save from Ameobi (even if it was probably going wide) and excellent handling all night gave us one less worry. Four clean sheets in five and he also kicks a fair bit better than Jens.7
Lauren: Though Lauren Robert didn’t reach anything like his best, I’m not sure whether too much credit should go to Lauren. His positioning often seemed weak, his passing and tackling little better and he offered almost nothing in attack. Mr Average was distinctly poor. 5.5
Cole: Whilst there’s no shame in being given a tough time of things by Craig Bellamy, Cole’s performance was noticeably worse than just a torrid time. He made stupid, unnecessary fouls, got caught out when he should normally have had enough pace and looked very, very shaky. He may have been pushed a touch for the penalty incident, but a defender with his mind fully on the job wouldn’t have allowed the ball to hit him as blatantly as it did. In mitigation he did improve and unlike Lauren provided some attacking threat. 5.5
Kolo: Did alright but like the others his decision making didn’t always seem to be the best informed. That said, it’s a little harsh to chastise a central defender who has kept four clean sheets in five. 6.5
Sol: Urgh. After some very sound recent performances he seemed far too troubled by what looked like some relatively simple long balls. One such error allowed Ameobi in for his early chance and his lack of authority always made the long ball route look like a wise one for Newcastle to take. 6
Flamini: Not his best game for Arsenal but he still got through a lot of work, kept things simple and had a hand in setting up Vieira for the goal. 6.5
Vieira: Named man of the match by SKY and praised in a couple of papers, but I’m going to be honest and say that up until he scored I thought he was pretty useless, being caught in possession too often. That said in the second half he got through a fair bit of work as we ground out victory. 6.5
Fred: Beavered away, had some good moments and kept on trying. Was going to commend him for his work on a couple of occasions in particular but can’t now remember what they were. 7
Pires: Even by his standards, his tackling was poor today. Truth be told, I can’t fathom how he’s allowed to defend with his body constantly side on to the play. As a left winger he has defensive responsibilities and simply has to make a better fist of it. On the attacking front he was probably our most creative player, moving the ball smartly and at pace. 6
Van Persie: Still very, very raw. Unlucky not to score in the opening minutes and had a couple more decent efforts but all too frequently ran into trouble and lost the ball on what was admittedly an awful surface completely unsuited to his quick twists and turns. Corners weren’t bad. Needs time. 6.5
Henry: His touch was not quite at its magical best, but again this was probably due to the state of the pitch. Had a couple of good runs that resulted in decent shots on Shay Given’s goal. 6.5
Subs:
Clichy (for Van Persie 80 mins approx): Seemed as happy as anyone in the post match huddle but for the second game in succession he seemed a little out of sorts when called upon. 6
v Fulham (2-0)
Almunia: Looks better by the game and made a crucial save when he rushed out at speed to palm away a Fulham chance at 1-0. Made no notable mistakes. 7
Clichy: Had a good first half – getting forward well as usual and strong on the defensive stuff. Then in the second half he seemed to lose his confidence went, either as a result of or because of Fulham consistently probing down our left. Like any small full-back, aerial strength is a weakness.6
Lauren: Average as usual. Looked solid against a Fulham attack lacking any real penetration. 6.5
Sol: At times we were troubled in the air – but Sol is leading a defence that is no longer allowing attackers completely free headers at corners. Looks fit and healthy and, along with the rest of the defence, now has three clean sheets in four league games. 7
Freddie: A fine game on his return from migraine troubles. Played in Henry for the first and set-up Pires for the second. 7.5
Cesc: Gets caught on the ball occasionally but is still doing the vast majority of things with real fluency. Gives us real creativity in the middle. 7
Vieira: Showed a few soft shoe shuffles to bamboozle defenders in a way we haven’t really seen this season. Also got stuck into his tackles and generally seemed to be on the ball. 7
Pires: There was this surreal moment in the first half. He got the ball on the left wing and took a heavy touch. As if that wasn’t enough he then went flying into the tackle with the Fulham defender and actually won the ball. And it wasn’t the only time – I saw him snuff out a few Fulham attacks and even win a header.
Of course, the attacking side of his play was superb as well – he would have scored from a Dennis chest down but for a good save by Van De Saar. He linked up well, particularly with Henry, and inevitably took his goal with typical aplomb. Now has 19 in 2004, which is good. 7.5
Dennis: A fair few poor touches and bad decision making in general play. In mitigation, he dummied the ball well for the second goal and put Pires in with an excellent chest down. 6.5
Henry: Sure, the flicks didn’t always come off but at times he led Fulham a merry dance like he has almost every other defence this season. His goal was a trade mark finish and he was desperately unlucky when his side footer from the edge of the box crashed back off a post. 7
Subs:
Flamini (for Freddie 74ish): Some might say Arsene was making a point by not replacing Freddie with Pennant. Others will call it a sensible way of seeing out the game. 6.5
Van Persie (for Dennis 78ish): Provided his usual array of tricks but didn’t get a real chance to score. 6.5
v Portsmouth (1-0)
Almunia: Had a really good game. Caught when he needed to catch, punched when he wasn't sure and kicked immaculately. Also made a couple of really good saves. His run of impressive performances may only stretch to two but for now there seems no reason to bring back Jens. 8
Lauren: Did nothing too wrong but didn't offer as much in attack as he might have and at times appeared troubled by Pomey's pace. I think he's ok, but I'm becoming less and less convinced he should be our right back at all - more on that tomorrow. 6.5
Cole: A tough one to call. For a while looked rattled by Pompey's pace and agression down the left. Misplaced a couple of balls and though his tackles were mostly coming off they had a slightly concerning aggressiveness about them which made me think he was letting his own frustration get the better of him a little. But stuck to the task well and in the end kept a dangerous Pompey out. 7
Kolo: Got sucked in a couple of times, but on the whole he was part of a defence that looked pretty solid and much improved at set pieces. 7
Sol: Looked fitter than recently I thought - turning smoothly on a couple of occasions when faced with danger. He also made countless important headers at corners and won us the game with the kind of head down sheer determinism many fans would like to see a little more often. 8
Flamini: Ran hard, tackled hard and never gave up. Doesn't offer as much going forward as Fabregas, but doesn't claim to either. Unlucky with a header from Henry's free-kick. 7
Vieira: Industrious, but was also sloppy on occasion, getting caught in posession and losing the ball. Still doesn't seem 100% back to his best and didn't make the most of a couple of shooting opportunities. 6.5
Clichy: Fought well and offered Cole valuable protection down the left hand side. Showed initial attacking promise early on but faded as Pompey grew in stature. Nonetheless, was full of running at the end and nearly capitalised on tired Pompey legs. 7
Pires: His every touch was met with a chorus of boos as Bob faced Pompey for the first time since 'that dive' last season. There was even one moment when he slipped and the ball rolled out of play. Which probably made a certain journalist very, very warm inside. Otherwise, was neat enough but pretty ineffectual, seemingly afraid of injury in the rough house atmosphere. Had a couple of lovely runs late on and set Dennis up for a chance he really should have taken. 6.5
Henry: Worked hard and created much of our best work, but often found himself crowded out by the hoardes of Pompey defenders. Nearly scored after a flowing first half move and set up Dennis' other chance late on, which again he really should have taken. 7
Van Persie: Started really well, showing fantastic feet and trickery and generally leading Pompey a merry dance. He swivels at such speed he'll probably need a hip replacement aged 30. Faded somewhat after his impressive start, finding himself crowded out by the packed defence. Could pass a little earlier at times but nonetheless a decent first start in a difficult game and he staked a fair claim for inclusion against Fulham on Boxing Day. 6.5
Subs:
Bergkamp (for Van Persie 68ish): Should have scored late on following good set up play. His performance did little to silence the voices calling for this year to be his last. I'm undecided on that, but what I am sure about is that I won't miss the needless little kicks and elbows aimed at his opponents when frustration sets in. Simply put: the sly digs are ugly and Van Nistelrooy like and do nothing for us. 6
v Chelsea (2-2)
Almunia: Faultless for both their goals, he made good stops from Lampard and Gudjohnsen in the first half. And made a vital save when Robben wriggled his way through after the break. But nobody noticed it. Caught when a catch was a good idea, punched when a punch was wiser and set us on the attack with some good throws. 7.5
Lauren: Didn't see much of him, but when you're up against Duff and Robben, this can only be to a defender's credit. Thought he did really well to keep them in check, and the one time Robben did really threaten in the second half, the danger came down the other side. 7.5
Cole: The one player who I thought struggled today. As has been the case of late, he lacked confidence in his touch and stuggled defensively. Perhaps should have come out to Robben before the winger got into the box for his 2nd half chance, and was easily beaten in the air by Drogba for Cheslea's 2nd equaliser. 6
Kolo: Looked solid overall and helped limit Chelsea to only a few chances asides from set pieces. 7
Sol: A mixed bag. Made some really important defensive headers and looked in command at times at the back. But was a little caught out for their opening goal and sometimes seemed a little gung ho in his marking. Made important late tackle on Drogba.7
Reyes: Was quiet, but this was a tough game. Nodded down to Henry for the opener, worked hard and went on a few mazy runs without much success. Still, I thought he gave them something to worry about.6.5
Fabregas: Another excellent performance. He and Flamini were overwhelmed initially when up against Tiago, Lampard and Makalele but never gave up and fought their way back into the game admirably. Nice goal to set up Henry for the opener, he was instrumental in setting up the Frenchman's near winner and also set up RVP for his chance. Uses the ball so intelligently and showed that despite his size, he's not afraid to get stuck in. Was up against the very best in the business today and succeeded in limiting Lampard to a largely peripheral role.8
Flamini: £1 million? First league start? A snip if you ask me. He run's tirelessly, he harries, he puts his foot in and he uses the ball simply when he wins it. A real water carrier but absolutely essential today and worked tirelessly. Well done Sir. 8
Pires: We wanted a big performance and boy did we get one. Seemed almost impossible to shake off the ball, tackled back, linked up well with Lauren, Flamini, Cesc and Henry and drove the team forward in his own idiosyncratic waddle. When in his pomp, he is still a wonderful, wonderful footballer to watch. Set up Henry for the near winner, realised his responsibility as the senior partner in midfield, and shouldered the responsibility admirably.7.5
Dennis: Didn't get involved in too much of note, but I can't help feeling he just gives us a cetain sophistication and shape when he's in the side. Gordon Strachan pointed out on Match of the Day how hard he'd worked to stop Makalele getting the ball and in hindsight I think it probably a fair call.6.5
Henry: Forget the late miss - it can happen to anyone. Otherwise he was outstanding, scoring a brilliant first (which included winning a high ball!), netting an impudent second and generally running the show. Scared Chelsea shitless every time he picked it up and was responsible for a hell of a lot of good work. Also destroyed the concept he doesn't turn it on in big games. That's 15 in 17 league games now by the way.9
Subs:
Clichy (for Reyes 82): Ran around like mad for 10 minutes and forced mistakes out of tired legs. Really good footballer and good enough to start for probably every Premiership side and perhaps should be more often for us. 7.5
RVP: Is maturing very nicely indeed. Nearly netted a silky winner when he latched onto Cesc's pass and gave the Chelsea players a lot to think about. Would be really interesting to see him start. 7
v Rosenberg (5-1)
Almunia: Made a really, really good low save early on and kicked largely well. But looked dodgy more than once on crosses and for the second time in a week cost us a goal, which is a real worry. Eventually realised there's nothing wrong with giving a ball a good double handed punch. 6
Hoyte: Was up against a poor opposition but defended diligently and rarely looked rushed. Used the ball well, linked up well with his team mates and should be well pleased with his first European start. 7
Cole: Looked solid, with a couple of important defensive headers, but still not yet back to his marauding best I sense. Shouldn't have let the ball drop over his head for Harald Brattbakk to fire at Alumnia after 17 minutes. Withdrawn with quarter of an hour left. 6.5
Sol: Ditto for above, though did once later on look somewhat sluggish again on the turn. Perhaps I'm just paranoid about the impending arrival of Duff and Robben at Highbury.6.5
Kolo: A very easy night for the big man and he even found time for a classic Kolo dance into the opposition penalty area towards the end. 7
Flamini: Very, very good full debut. Set up the second goal, ran tirelessly, got tackles in and seemed to work well with Cesc in midfield. Looks comfortable tracking back and going forward and also seems to have a strange affinity for joining in attacks right around the right edge of the penalty area and particularly when we attack the North Bank. A young, thinking man's Gilles Grimandi, he ain't at all bad for a fifth choice midfielder. 7.5
Cesc: Absolute star. Has already played 20 games this season (twice as many as Edu, Gilberto and Vieira), yet still had the strength to turn in one of his best performances for the club. Fantastically alert, his use of the ball was excellent. He also scored a very impressive, very difficult goal and was involved in the build up for the fifth. Not just our most frequent performer in midfield this season, but also our best. 8
Jose: Took his goal really well and gave us a flying start. Had another deflected shot well saved and looked much more like the sun kid of the beginning of the season. Had a delightful late chip that bamboozled three very stupid looking Rosenberg players before landing on the roof of the net. 7
Pires: Looked much, much better and was even spotted making a tackle late in the second half. Kept going and linked up well late on with Jose and RVP before being withdrawn for Quincy with two minutes left. His penalty was so brilliantly placed it went into the side netting. Again I marvel at his ability to put a football exactly where he wants it to go. 7
Bergkamp: A nice return for the Ice Man who got involved well in the game, set up the opener and had a couple of openings himself. Might have done better when in front of goal, but eased himself back into the side well. 7
Henry: I actually thought that poor as the defending was for his goal, it was still a pretty decent finish. Worked hard all night, linked up well with the kids around him and seemed to be feeling particularly tolerant. 7
Subs:
Clichy (for Dennis 72ish): Spent a few mins in midfield before dropping back to left back when RVP replaced Ashley. As ever looked sound in the defending and assured going forward.
7
RVP (for Cole 75): Resuscitated the game with some silky skills, wayward finishing and then eventually a very well taken goal. Rawer than an uncooked vegetable, but with massive potential. 7.5
Quincy (for Bob 88): Should have had longer. Don't think he got a touch.
v Birmingham (3-0)
Alumnia: Looks like Lehman, kicks slightly better than Lehman, fumbles the odd ball like Lehman and jumps a couple of inches less high in the air than Lehman. Did ok, but would have been ill advised to let Morrison’s second half effort creep under him and over the line.6.5
Lauren: Seemed really quiet yesterday. Means he was doing his defensive job well which at the moment is the priority. Better? Seeing as we kept a clean sheet, probably a tad. 6.5
Cole: It's not been picked up much by the press, but I’ve thought Ash to be one of the players whose form has most obviously dipped in the recent spell. He’s still looked a top left back, but the subtlety of touch that allowed him and Bob to link so well still seems to be absent. Better? Not noticeably, but again should take credit for a clean sheet. 7
Sol: I’m of the opinion he’s still carrying a little bit of weight. Played well enough, but on a couple of occasions he looked sluggish and immobile on the turn, which is obviously a concern with Duff and Robben coming to town next week. Better? Probably not. 6.5
Kolo: Probably fair to say he’s not been our worst performer in the recent period, but I think on occasion he has allowed our recent jitters to affect his decision making a little. Kept Heskey quiet, but also seemed to time his jumps wrongly on a couple of occasions. Better? Ditto above. 7
Vieira: Did some good stuff but on other occasions his decision making and concentration again seemed lacking a little. He’s a hard one to judge at the moment. Better? Probably a bit.7
Cesc: I’m glad to see he escaped censure for his recent performances because I think a lot of the recent mutterings about how he’s no Gilberto have been unfair. Admittedly, the Brazilian’s best work is done off the ball, SKY’s stats show how we tend to win with him in the side, but I still think the young Spaniard is doing pretty well. He’s a young boy whose probably played too many games in a struggling team in a big league. But he’s still there, still getting stuck in and still doing his stuff. Tired in the latter stages yesterday and was replaced by Flamini, which was a wise, common sense, decision. Better? No, but only because he was doing well in the first place. 7
Freddie: Scavenged, burrowed, furrowed, ducked and dived. Fred’s doing them all at the moment and its working as the perfect complement to the continued attempts at perfection that come from the rest of the team. Is also being very productive. Should have had a penalty yesterday, set up the third goal and generally ran the show. Better? No, but only because he’s been great. 7.5
Pires: Mark my words. One of these days the opposition are going to get a free kick on the edge of our area. Their player will hit it, the ball will fly off Robert Pires and zip past Lehman. And we’ll all put it down as a fluke, like we did for Graveson’s effort that flew off Pennant in the Carling Cup game against Everton. Except it won’t be a fluke because Pires, like Pennant, will have jumped with his back to the ball, meaning that when it hits him he’ll have no way of giving it any direction.
My point is that Pires simply has to go into tackles. Maybe he’s worried about getting hurt, but he’s ducking out of the most basic challenges and its meaning we’re losing the battle in midfield at places like Old Trafford and Anfield.
Obviously, as I was making a note of this, Bob went and scored a classic Bob goal. Basically a really, really good one. He is a fantastic playa, probably the purest footballer we have in our team and quite possibly the best finisher. Yesterday was his 50th goal for the club and almost without exception (Bolton at home this season) they’ve been aesthetically perfect and a joy to watch.
But he must pull his weight for the team, which funnily enough I’ve seen him do really well on a number of occasions. Better? A little bit later on in the second half. 6.5
Reyes: You have to feel for him - seemingly everything he tries seems to go askew these days. Inches away from a Henry cross in the first half, he got into the game a bit more going towards half time, but then tired before being withdrawn. As I said above, he could do with a 25 minute run against tired defences to get his confidence back. Better? Not really, but not for want of effort. 6.5
Henry: Whether it be through injury or lack of confidence, he spent much of the game getting into decent positions but then making the wrong decision. Then ten minutes from time he took off past Melchiot, through the Birmingham defence and then a cool low finish hit whilst he was running at incredible speed. Six minutes later, he bought a ticket for Freddie Ljungberg’s cross and got lucky.
May not be at his best. But the level of criticism he of all people has taken is ridiculous. Has scored 13 league goals this season (four more than anyone else and 9 more than Ruud), scoring in 11 of the 16 games. And it’s not even like he’s bound to get the goals because nobody else does. He hasn’t even scored a third of our goals, and with the exception of Old Trafford (when nobody scored) and Selhurst Park, at least one other Arsenal player has scored in all of our other games.
Better? Yes. Despite earlier failures, his determination to keep going for the all important second goal was admirable. 7.5
Subs:
Clichy (for Jose): I love this guy. He’s like Wenger’s little foot soldier and seems capable of doing everything. Slotted in expertly in left midfield. He covers, chases back, tackles, retains the ball, gets forward, dribbles and causes havoc in the opposition defence. He may be more defensive than Reyes, but sometimes being slightly more defensive can give you the shape to attack more. May not be suited to central midfield, but should be considered a serious option for a place in left midfield on tough away games. 7.5
Flamini: Seems to do everything neatly enough without being spectacular. Will be interesting to see how he works with Cesc over the next two games.7
v Man United (0-1)
Alumnia: Crap on their goal, barely put a foot wrong otherwise. Plays and looks like a slightly smaller Jens, but can kick. 6
Hoyte: OK and defended well on occasion, but I’d still like to see him get forward more. That said, I think he’s a player who would look much better surrounded by seasoned pros. 6.5
Clichy: Really, really good as usual. Slipped on their excuse of a pitch for the early goal, but didn’t let it affect him and worked tirelessly defending and attacking all game. 7.5
Senderos: The lumbering giant of Everton had been replaced by a very, very accomplished looking centre half. One dodgy back header that fell short but otherwise cut out everything that was asked of him and looked a real first team option. 8
Djorou: Took eye off ball and then slipped for the goal which wasn’t good. Never quite looked the same player as against Everton, but worked his way back into the game. 6.5
Flamini: Looks like we can breathe a little more easily in the midfield department after watching a very assured display. Would like to see him trialled as a sub for Freddie in games where we’ve got a dodgy one goal lead. 7
Larsson: Some like him but I’m not so sure. What he did was decent enough but I thought he struggled to have an effect on the game. 6.5
Quincy: Maybe it was the pitch, maybe it was United doubling up on him. Either way the hero of the last round never really got into last night’s affair. 6
Pennant: Worked hard, tried to take the initiative and overall did quite well. Still not sure if he’ll quite make it at Highbury though. 7
Lupoli: Is a striker and when strikers get no service they don’t look much kop. 6.5
Van Persie: Battled hard all night and willingly came deep to win possession. But probably came a bit too deep and battled a bit too hard. Yes, he could have been sent off for the incident with Richardson. Reminds me a bit of a young Freddie, not in playing style but in the way that the potential is clearly there but the skills are still very, very raw. 6.5
Subs:
Smith (for Lupoli): Did OK but still looks wary of going in for challenges and taking men on following his long term injury.
Cregg: Alright
Karbassiyoon: Alright
|
| |