|
| |
Latest Updates:
31 MARCH 2005
30 MARCH 2005
29 MARCH 2005
25 MARCH 2005
21 MARCH 2005
19 MARCH 2005
13 MARCH 2005
11 MARCH 2005
09 MARCH 2005
08 MARCH 2005
05 MARCH 2005
02 MARCH 2005
01 MARCH 2005
27 FEBRUARY 2005
25 FEBRUARY 2005
23 FEBRUARY 2005
22 FEBRUARY 2005
20 FEBRUARY 2005
19 FEBRUARY 2005
18 FEBRUARY 2005
15 FEBRUARY 2005
13 FEBRUARY 2005
9 FEBRUARY 2005
8 FEBRUARY 2005
6 FEBRUARY 2005
4 FEBRUARY 2005
2 FEBRUARY 2005
1 FEBRUARY 2005
30 JANUARY 2005
29 JANUARY 2005
27 JANUARY 2005
26 JANUARY 2005
24 JANUARY 2005
17 JANUARY 2005
16 JANUARY 2005
15 JANUARY 2005
10 JANUARY 2005
08 JANUARY 2005
06 JANUARY 2005
01 JANUARY 2005
31 DECEMBER 2004
30 DECEMBER 2004
29 DECEMBER 2004
26 DECEMBER 2004
24 DECEMBER 2004
23 DECEMBER 2004
22 DECEMBER 2004
21 DECEMBER 2004
20 DECEMBER 2004
19 DECEMBER 2004
17 DECEMBER 2004
17 DECEMBER 2004
16 DECEMBER 2004
15 DECEMBER 2004
14 DECEMBER 2004
13 DECEMBER 2004
13 DECEMBER 2004
12 DECEMBER 2004
11 DECEMBER 2004
10 DECEMBER 2004
09 DECEMBER 2004
07 DECEMBER 2004
07 DECEMBER 2004
05 DECEMBER 2004
01 DECEMBER 2004
|
|
31 MARCH 2005 08:00David Rocastle four years on
Just a brief update this morning as I’m running late.
The big news seems to be that England have demonstrated their ability to make some of the world’s worst international teams look like some of the world’s worst international teams. Quite how David Beckham could describe last night as an ‘extraordinary’ performance is beyond me.
Anyway, club football returns very shortly.
And finally, spare a thought for David Rocastle today. He died exactly four years ago. I for one will always remember where I was and what was going on when I heard the news – which pretty much sums up the admiration I had for the guy as I grew up. Let’s hope the club find a fitting memorial for him in the new ground and let’s hope it doesn’t consist of naming some poxy bar in the club level area after him.
30 MARCH 2005 08:00Freddie not to quit, Aliadiere may do, Edu probably will and England
Yesterday was the day for clarifications: Freddie Ljungberg said he wasn’t actually quitting international football (which makes sense) and Jeremie Aliadiere explained his transfer situation.
The young Frenchman explained that he rejected a month’s loan at West Ham, fearing his fitness would not be up to scratch. He went on to say: "Now, I am waiting to see how the end of the season will be. If Arsene Wenger plays me, I can stay. However if he doesn't make me participate, I would tell him that I want to leave to play. Perhaps he won't appreciate it because he has always trusted me for the last six years. But I think I can make a name for myself at Arsenal. Besides Thierry Henry there is a place to take."
All of which sounds fair enough. And a happy birthday to him too today. And to me as well.
And it looks like Edu could be off to Valencia for the 9876th time.
The other news is that the greatest show on earth rolls in to Newcastle tonight. Fresh from beating Northern Ireland 4-0 now it’s the turn of the mighty Azerbaijan to feel the full wrath of the world beaters. Sod the incompetence of the performance against Holland, forget the absolute grimness of the defeat against Spain, the victory over Northern Ireland makes us clear favourites for the World Cup.
Just spare me the “Coles light up Newcastle" headlines tomorrow morning.
Right, that amounts to two morning updates in two days. Hurrah.
29 MARCH 2005 08:00Freddie to retire? Aliadiere and England certain to win World Cup.
Wow, a proper, scheduled update.
Not surprisingly, there’s not a lot of Arsenal news this morning. Freddie says he may quit playing for Sweden to concentrate on playing for us. He reveals that a new contract is in the pipeline and makes the salient point that goalscoring wise, this has been a very successful season for him, despite Henry, Pires and Reyes all having got into double figures and Paddy, Dennis and Van Persie hitting a few too.
I think our remarkable goalscoring consistency is a fact missed by some people too ready to criticise all aspects of the team this season.
Elsewhere, I read the story about Jeremie Aliadiere talking about moving to PSG. To me it sounds like Wenger telling him he doesn’t have a future at the club as opposed to any great inability to settle as one of the reports said. I say this because he’s been at Highbury seven years so has probably just about got past the settling in stage. Anyway, I wish him well and feel we that if we are letting him go it could be a little hasty.
And now to England:
Seeing as we’d just scored more than two goals in a qualifier for about the third time in god knows how many qualifiers under Sven (including games against some seriously pathetic sides, all twice) there was bound to be a bit of hype.
But I can’t quite see how Wayne Rooney and Joe Cole giving Northern Ireland the runabout somehow makes England favourites to win the World Cup. After all, when Quincy and Arturo Lupoli ripped the Everton defence to shreds in the League Cup last November we didn’t hail the emergence of a new world force.
The irony is that England are actually a team chock full of vastly talented players. The defence is as obdurate as they come, with a surplus of excellent centre-backs. The midfield, with an on form Joe Cole on the left, look strong in spite of Beckham’s weaknesses. And up front Rooney and Owen may not fit like a glove, but any rational analysis would include both as first class forwards who both score goals.
What was promising about England’s play was a potential loosening of Sven’s perennial caution. But a real appraisal of a change in Sven’s tactics can’t possibly be made against such a weak side as Northern Ireland. And nor can it be against Azerbaijan tomorrow night.
Tougher tests will tell us whether, after four and a half years of pussy footing around, Sven has finally realised to get the best out of players who ply their trade in sides playing good football (even Liverpool are ok now) you need to let them stick to the expressive, power play they know best.
25 MARCH 2005 08:00The Ashley Cole saga. Yawn.
The laptop is finally back. Hurrah.
So since the last posting we’ve had Jose Reyes once more court the attention of Real Madrid and the Ashley Cole to Chelsea saga carry on. It’s simply riveting. Really.
All I’ll say is that if Ashley Cole did indeed deliberately meet with Chelsea it was foolish, naïve and stupid, particularly in the week before the Man United game. But I’m not about start booing him. He’s made one silly mistake and that is it.
Frankly, I was more annoyed when he got sent off for that stupid tackle at Leicester.
The story has been inflated enormously in recent days but really is nothing more than a meeting that would be part of everyday life in any other profession.
All that said, I think something needs doing about Jose Mourinho and Peter Kenyon. Their crime may not be the biggest, but their flagrant disregard for the rules and their subsequent (apparent) lies should simply not be tolerated.
The same is true for their European charges. UEFAs response may be somewhat bizarre and far stronger than any stance they’ve ever taken over racism but their point is generally right.
In a game that is hardly pure at the best of times, Mourinho and Kenyon are souring football. Winners are never perfect: right through from the kicking Leeds sides of the 70s, to the bullying Man United of the 90s and the sometimes theatrical Arsenal side of last year. But Mourinho’s determination to win at all costs is in danger of forever etching great negativity on what his team achieve this season.
And the shame is that with the exception of the Mourinho indoctrinated Ricardo Carvalho, it is hard to quibble too much with the side who appear destined to win the league. I don’t think they’re up there with last year’s unbeatables but they clearly deserve to win the league and in the likes of Terry, Lampard, Cech, Duff and Robben have players who have had really fine seasons.
Anyway, enough of Chelsea.
Injuries and the resultant unfamiliar sides have made it pretty hard to draw many conclusions from the last few games. But what was interesting was Wenger’s refusal to make substitutions either at the Reebok or at Ewood. It meant the likes of Pires, Reyes and Van Persie being asked to dig in and defend right up to the 90th minute. I suspect he was making a point.
Proper, consistent updates should hopefully return for good from Tuesday.
21 MARCH 2005Let's not lose the league at Chelsea
The good news is that the laptop is now fixed. The bad news is that it's
been delivered to London. Which is a long way from Newcastle. The better
news is that I'll be down in London on the weekend so normal service should
resume then. (ie regular updates and ones that aren't completely out of
date when they do arrive).
Anyway, the bad news is that Chelsea could win the league at home to us.
Irrespective of how we do in our next two games, if they win theirs and
then beat us then the gap will be a minimum of 16 points with only 15 to
play for. That said, they would need Man United to lose one and draw one of
their next three.
It's fair to say the Blackburn game wasn't a cracker but then its also fair
to say that were we 13 points clear at the moment we'd be saying it was
exactly the kind of performance required at this stage of the season. And
bearing in mind we were missing Sol, Henry, Bergkamp, Ljungberg, Pires, Edu
and Gilberto we can't complain too much.
It was also good to see Van Persie back in among the goals. Whilst he
probably went a little far on SKY by describing the strike as 'great' for
him it's fair to say he's suffered at least his fair share of criticism for
the sending off at Southampton a few weeks. So good for him.
There's not really a lot else to say. International fortnight will drag on
and by the time we face Norwich in a couple of weeks we'll be longing for
club football again.
19 MARCH 2005Blackburn and early kick offs: very popular this spring
The laptop has spent the last fortnight in hospital having the computer equivalent of a hip replacement, hence the lack of site updates. I’ve also become incredibly bored of the whole Ashley Cole saga which is just about the most uninteresting thing ever, giving me even less reason to email updates.
Elsewhere, we’ve got a 12.15 kick-off against Blackburn in the Cup semi, which makes it impossible for me to attend, which is nice. The rest of the news isn’t much better either: Arsene seems to be suggesting that Reyes could well be off to Madrid and we’ve had to put up with Chelsea going thirteen points clear. Which isn’t fun. To top it all off, international week is just around the corner.
I see Chelsea got Bayern in the next phase of the Champions League , which will no doubt give all and sundry yet another opportunity to detail our slip and their rise. For me it’s a lot simpler: Chelsea won’t defend as appallingly as we did. I fully expect them to win. Not with ease, but convincingly enough nonetheless.
A lot of fuss is being made about Arsene possibly finishing as low as third this season, which tells you how far we’ve come. That said, I’d still love to pip United for second. It would be the third time in four years they’d have finished outside the top two, which is a far bigger story than us doing so for the first time in eight.
After a hat-trick for the reserves, Aliadiere is now pushing for involvement, as is Quincy.
Gilberto will soon be ready to play his first game since we were still unbeaten after coming through 65 minutes against the Chelsea seconds in midweek.
13 MARCH 2005 04:00GMTArsenal defeat dirty, diving, dour Bolton
Just to get it out the way: yes, I admit that Bolton are a hardworking team who press the opposition well.
That said, there can surely be no more miserable a footballing outfit in Britain, right down from Fat Sam in the dugout to the part timers who can’t even fill the ground for an FA Cup Quarter Final.
Bolton were simply atrocious, in so many ways. Sure we’re crap at the back, but their sole tactic of tossing the ball high into the box did football no favours whatsoever. And despite some dodgy defending they didn’t get an unjustified equaliser from the most uninspiring of tactics.
Secondly they were dirty fuckers who went after our players with menace. We soon discovered that the only thing worse than playing Bolton in usual circumstances is when one of their players has been justifiably sent-off. According to the law of Fat Sam this then gives them the right to kick opposition players off the park without repercussions.
And now he’s had the cheek to criticise Jens for the sending-off, saying: "Lehmann had no need to go up to him. He has gone over to intimidate Diouf, the lad has reacted and got himself sent-off. I think as always the goalkeeper has made a meal of it and used gamesmanship to get Diouf dismissed but if you lift your hands you have to go."
First things first, he’s called Lehman a serial cheat, so that will be an FA misconduct charge under the Ruud laws thank you very much.
But let’s give Sam some credit here. Just suppose Lehman was going over to Diouf to have a go. Is it possible that perhaps he was telling him to stop being such a diving cheat, like the rest of his team mates. Because though Kevin Davies had been fouled outside the area by Kolo, Diouf’s attempt to win a penalty was as farcical as Davies’ dives for the rest of the game.
How Bolton kept 10 men on the pitch I don’t know. And rather than lauding their ‘honesty’ (god I hate that word) we should look at how they did their best in every way to prevent any football from being played at all.
For the record, we did reasonably well but allowed ourselves to relax too much after the sending-off. What was particularly interesting was the decision not to use subs. To me it seemed as though Reyes and Pires (the most likely withdrawals) were being told to show their ability to battle until the last. Still, a deserved victory.
Elsewhere, talk of the Ashley Cole meeting with Chelsea continues. The latest is that his agent denies setting up a meeting with Chelsea, as alleged in the Sun on Saturday morning. Personally, I’m not sure how any of this changes anything. The fact is that if Ashley Cole attended a meeting, it’s fair to say he did so under his own free will, irrespective of who actually set it up.
And while I agree that it was stupid to arrange the meeting so near to the United game, it was five days and a whole weekend before. The problem was obviously it being released in the Sunday papers two days before the game. I’m not saying I condone him going off to meet them. But the fact is that by all accounts there is a serious difference between what we are offering him money wise at the moment and what Chelsea can offer. So it’s not unreasonable for him to try and improve his position and sadly that appears to involve crawling to Peter Kenyon. So perhaps we shouldn’t get too wound up about it, though that said it probably hasn't helped team spirit much…
But anyway, the great news is that we’re through to the semi-finals and not only that but we’ve beaten Fat Sam along the way. Which is lovely. It would take some side to show less imagination than Stoke, Wolves and Sheffield United but credit to him, he managed it.
One day, we’ll give a right hammering and hopefully it will be the one that sends them down.
The draw is Monday lunchtime and as things stand we’ll get one of Blackburn/Leicester, Newcastle/Spurs or United. Gooners with a historical record will know that in reality, we’re not really going to face Blackburn or Leicester. Five of the eight FA semi-finals I’ve seen us play have been against United or Spurs. I’m betting on six out of nine.
11 MARCH 2005 23:55GMTThe fallout from elimination: where Arsenal stand now
Thanks to the little sister for scribbling down my phone rantings ten minutes after the game and turning them into yesterday’s piece. Now for some more considered thought:
After our mid season slump it was patently obvious that we weren’t going to win the Champions League. It was always a question of WHEN rather than IF elimination would occur. But more to the point it was a question of HOW.
In the end it was quite a strange elimination and certainly not one that many people would have predicted. A lot’s been said about how Munich outplayed us and for the first 40 minutes and parts of the 2nd half that was true. But we defended very well on the whole, limited the number of clear cut chances they fashioned and then turned up the pressure in the 2nd half and got a goal through fantastic opportunism from our striker. Were we now taking a 1-0 lead to Germany for the 2nd leg, then Wednesday’s performance might have been hailed as the night Arsenal finally came of age in Europe and learnt to play the Champions League game against what I thought were an excellent Bayern side.
So while there were some real positives to be taken from the result, it would be very naïve to say that everything was ok last night. That doesn’t mean that we saw a lot new that was wrong but:
Again we seemed unbalanced in midfield. Far too often Bayern played straight through Flamini and Vieira. They of course weren’t helped by Reyes (as everyone has noted) and Freddie (as far fewer have pointed out) having poor games. But really, I think we need to solidify the midfield a little more by ensuring that either the left and right wings are manned by a Clichy or Fabregas type player, particularly against tougher opposition.
And so where are we left now?
Some say Arsene will never achieve the European dream and should give up on it now. Absolute rubbish in my opinion – but it is true that we are currently in a sort of limbo. I don’t see us winning in Europe until we move to the new stadium. Sure, teams with small grounds have succeeded in Europe before, but the higher the new stadium rises the more inferior Highbury feels. It’s a fantastic old ground but it’s never, ever been a Champions League ground.
And what of the team?
Well, we had three trophyless years from 1998-2001, culminating in the 2-1 Cup Final defeat to Liverpool. Even though we then splashed out on five new players, it only took the addition of Sol Campbell to turn us into a brilliant double winning side.
But even though we won the league as recently as last May, we now need far more serious investment than four years ago.
Firstly, we need a new goalkeeper. Secondly, we probably need to change the arrangements at right-back – personally I wouldn’t mind seeing Kolo move across. And at centre-back Cygan is a perfectly decent player but not up to playing for Arsenal. So we are left with Sol Campbell and Senderos (who was absolutely fantastic last night). But still we need a new defender.
At left back we’re clearly well covered (assuming Cole stays). In central midfield, I can’t agree with anyone who says Vieira should be sold. If he wants to go, that’s one thing but think of almost all the great players and at some point you’ll remember them having a lean year. Think of Keane, Shearer, Dennis, Scholes and Giggs – for many of them their down points came around the same age as Vieira is now. He’s easily sold but far less easily replaced.
We may need a new midfielder though with Edu off and Cesc looking more and more like a right midfielder in my opinion… where he should be alternated with Ljungberg according to the nature of the game. And on the left we need to prepare for the end of Pires – the question of whether Jose is the man to replace him remains to be seen.
The bell has probably already sounded for Dennis though. (On a side point he was incredibly lucky not to be sent-off last night simply because aged 37 he can’t control his temper, which is pathetic). We can’t really carry on only having half our first choice strike force available for European away games – our record of three draws and a defeat on the road this season illustrates that perfectly.
So we are left with one brilliant, brilliant player and a lot of potential next to him. So we probably need to be looking to bring in an experienced foil. Who, I don’t know.
So all in all it seems there may be a fair bit of rebuilding necessary. All this may seem a little reactionary, but there’s nothing like elimination from the Champions League to focus the mind.
And make no mistake – there is still lot left to fight for this season. Not just the FA Cup but also second place in the league ahead of United. It may all seem a bit like playing second fiddle to Chelsea but as we know, things change quickly and Mourinho’s honeymoon won’t last forever.
09 MARCH 2005 Arsenal 1 (2) Bayern 0 (3)
If I had said to you at the beginning of the week that out of the two London clubs still in the Champions League, one would win 4-2 and one would win 1-0, you wouldn’t have put your money on Arsenal keeping the clean sheet, would you? How ironic that Chelsea conceded two goals on Tuesday – four on aggregate – whilst Arsenal, for all our defensive frailties, conceded none, although three on aggregate.
Firstly, the Germans were fantastic. It may sound like a cliché, but they were incredibly organised, which made them very difficult to break down. Last year we faced Celta Vigo in the second round. You just really can’t put the two on the same level. Which is why I feel only the obvious disappointment at going out in the second round, rather than believing that Arsenal really should have beaten Bayern. It wouldn’t be surprising if Bayern turned up for the Champions League final, whereas Vigo (if they were still in the competition) would look slightly more out of place there.
It was not only Bayern that played well. Arsenal put in a very good performance, but the damage had already been done in the first leg, by conceding three goals. Otherwise, winning against Bayern - and not conceding - would have been a great result. Considering individual players, Henry scored a lovely goal and proved that he does turn up for the big games. On his Champions League debut, Senderos had a great night. He deserved his lucky escape near the end when his header back to Lehmann went short. The midfield was still getting overrun. I wouldn’t have started with Reyes, and would have liked to see Clichy involved at some point.
Overall, this wasn’t a bad result. Chelsea got through to the next round by a contentious goal, and it’s also worth noting that they wouldn’t have scored 4 goals against Bayern. And there’s always the slight consolation that Man U were rubbish. We weren’t going to win the cup this season, but we should be proud of the commitment of the players. We won 1-0 against a very good Bayern side, and it was really defensive errors, an issue that everybody is aware of, that cost us three goals. Good luck to Liverpool, although they obviously don’t need it, having drawn Leverkusen in the second round…
08 MARCH 2005 Arsenal v Bayern
The laptop is back in hospital – hence the lack of recent updates. And the fact is I didn’t see our last game – which makes it difficult to maintain an Arsenal blog with any real credibility. Anyway, tonight we’re all backing Chelsea and United in their quest to qualify for the Champions League quarter-finals.
And then tomorrow night we have Munich at home, in case you haven’t heard. Team news is available in depth elsewhere but briefly: Cygan and Sol are out, Edu doubtful, Pires more likely than not fit and Jose and Dennis back from suspension.
Irrespective of who plays, I’d say the important thing is not to come out in a gung ho fashion and concede early goals. The fact is that while at half time we could easily have lost the tie there is no chance that we’ll have it tied up either. It’s worth remembering that our most famous 2-0 victory ever was 0-0 at the break.
So steady, concerted, probing pressure is the order of the day. Let the back four settle down, afford them the cover they need early on and then if need be throw everything at the Germans later on. Whatever the side, we should have room on the bench for a minimum of three out of Jose, Dennis, Pires, Van Persie, Clichy and Quincy. So we won’t be short of playas who can turn a game if need be.
And then there are three other things we need:
1) Our good playas (Vieira, Dennis, Henry) to perform.
2) Our defence to concentrate.
3) Our defence to get a little luck.
So, let’s hope for the best.
05 MARCH 2005 11:45GMTOwen linked with Arsenal, striking choices + Pompey preview
There was an interesting piece in last night’s Newcastle Evening Chronicle that said that if Michael Owen leaves Spain in the summer, Highbury (rather than St James’ Park) will be his likely destination.
Talking of strikers, we await with interest the front pairing for today’s game against Portsmouth. With Henry back and Freddie presumably going back out right, the boss will need to choose between Van Persie, Lupoli, Quincy and Aliadiere for the second attacking berth. There is also the position of left midfield up for grabs. Up until last Saturday Van Persie would have clearly come straight in next to Henry – but knowing how irate Wenger was with his red card, a return doesn’t look like a formality.
I’d suggest that Lupoli will probably not be the choice. He didn’t make a massive impression on Tuesday and is still very young (17) so there’s no need to rush him at all. Quincy will definitely be involved at some stage according to Wenger. And Aliadiere will be hoping to build on a decent seven minute appearance on Tuesday.
The boss used the young Frenchman sparingly last season but he’s a year older now (nearly 22) and nearing the Jermaine Pennant make or break stage. There is also the very pertinent question of who will comprise our strike force next season. Certainly, Aliadiere and Quincy are two of those who will be fighting to be one of our future front quartet/quintet. Incidentally, I wouldn’t be surprised if Jose has become a left winger by then (hopefully at Arsenal).
As for today’s line-up, I’d go with Van Persie up front and Clichy left again. Though that said, it could also be that we’ll see a little more of Cole playing in front of Clichy in the next few weeks.
So I reckon the side will be something like: Jens, Lauren, Kolo (Cygan is injured), Senderos, Cole, Vieira, Flamini, Ljungberg, Clichy (though possibly Quincy), Henry and Van Persie. Subs: Almunia, Cesc, Quincy, Aliadiere, Eboue.
I’m not going to be watching today’s game: unless I can persuade a barman in Newcastle that in fact it would be better for business if they showed Arsenal v Pompey rather than Newcastle v Liverpool. Not really gonna happen.
Talking of Newcastle, by a strange quirk of fate I bumped into the man who only a few days earlier had emailed me asking if I could make mention of arsenalimages, a collection of originals, prints and cards all drawn/painted by artist Dick Gilhespy. He works in the shadow of St James’ Park in what is literally the best footie bookshop I’ve ever seen – it’s collection of Arsenal books is astonishing.
Elsewhere, the It’s Up for Grabs Now! book is now available to buy. It’s a collection of supporters’ Anfield 1989 memories and all proceeds raised go directly to the Mark Fisher Trust, in memory of the great David Rocastle, who died almost four years ago.
02 MARCH 2005 09:00GMTArsenal battle, roll up sleeves and deservedly win on penalties
Sheffield United 0 Arsenal 0 AET. (Arsenal win 4-2 on penalties)
Being taken all the way to penalties by a pretty average first division side may not sound like everyone’s idea of a good performance. But from what half time onwards I was very happy.
In fact at half time I wasn’t too upset either. For all their huff and puff they’d only had the one first minute chance. Sure, we’d hardly created much either but this was always going to be a tough night. A brief scan of our team sheet told you this was to be no normal night: gone were a front four of Pires, Reyes, Dennis and Henry. In their place were an out of position Ljungberg, Arturo Lupoli, Ashley Cole and Cesc Fabregas. As the BBC commentator noted at one point: “Arsenal are currently playing a front three of Ashley Cole, Quincy and Kolo Toure.
So we came out for the 2nd half, took our gloves off (in Vieira’s case) and well and truly rolled our sleeves up, with the exception of Cole and Flamini who were already in short sleeves. We began to boss the game and seemingly created chance after chance after chance after chance and were thwarted only by a little profligacy, an inspired keeper, heroic defending and the balls amazing ability to fall anywhere but where we wanted it.
Yes, the home side had the odd chance but these things always stick that much more when it’s the home team and they’re trying to knock out a side like us. Essentially, we bossed the game and ultimately deserved to win in it on penalties.
The Blades big mistake was not to substitute the excellent, but injured, Paddy Kenny for the penalties. As soon as the ref blew for spot-kicks I thought that logically only piss poor penalties at him or one’s that flew into the Kop behind the goal would send us out. We seemed to sense that too and kept them cool and composed. It was also very pleasing to see the four players who should have taken the first four penalties actually take the responsibility for them.
I was very pleased with the performance and would agree wholly with the boss, who said on SKY after the match words along the line of: “Even had we lost on penalties I would have been proud of my players because they’d shown the right spirit and commitment."
I haven’t got time for full playa ratings now, but briefly, Almunia should take a hell of a lot of credit for last night. His save in the final minute to deny Harley showed great reactions that weren’t really appreciable on the slow motion replay. His two penalty saves that counted were also excellent but the best of the lot was the first one that was very harshly ruled out for coming off his line. Really great save I thought. Did well to rouse himself after that disappointment.
Lauren seemed ok, but nothing more. Some of his passing seemed odd at times and his running a little curious. But kept up his ice man image from 12 yards. Apart from the odd weak header he looked very strong and linked up excellently with Ashley Cole. Cygan was Cygan – the good and the ugly. A decent player who probably lacks the concentration to do well at this level. Senderos wasn’t bad.
Patrick Vieira had a poor first half (though again I wouldn’t really fault his effort) but was excellent in the second and drove the side on with a real captain’s performance. Flamini was excellent as ever and is looking like a serious steal.
The wings were very interesting – rather than play with two forwards there as in previous weeks we instead had a defender and a midfielder – and hey, it worked! Cole had a really good game, full of energy and commitment and unfortunate not to score on a couple of occasions. On this showing, I wouldn’t be surprised to see Sven bring in Bridge at left back and ask Ash to fill the problem left wing position.
Cesc, as I hinted at a few weeks ago, may well have a future as a right midfielder. He too attacked really well, got his foot in and generally seemed to benefit from not having quite as much responsibility in the middle of the park. Well done son.
Poor old Arturo Lupoli seemed to have magnets in his boot that repelled Arsenal players every time they got near him. He’ll have his time, but maybe it’s not yet. And Freddie scavenged and scavenged and scavenged and kept going through the moaning and the shirt pulling.
Of the subs, Quincy was a real star, turning the game as soon as he came on and giving Sheffield United a new problem they hadn’t considered. Kolo reminded us all that he really can play anywhere and Aliadiere looked sharp on his return and was unlucky not to score with his first touches.
Make no mistake, this had enormous upset potential. You know that’s so when the three BBC pundits were predicting the Champions would be booted out of the Cup by a lower league side. But we battled through, kept our discipline and never gave up. Was proud to be an Arsenal fan again last night. And thumbs up to the noisy away fans.
01 MARCH 2005 09:00GMTYou’ve still got to tackle, you’ve still got to close down, but lads, we must watch our behaviour
I sense a big, mushy, yellow banana skin with Neil Warnock’s face on it coming right our way if we’re not careful.
The team news for tonight is almost funny:
-We’re without our top five strikers (Henry, Dennis, Reyes, Van Persie and Aliadiere (who may come on for 20 minutes).
-The good news is that our second top goal scorer is not actually one of those players. He’s actually a winger.
-Sadly, Robert Pires is injured too.
-Of the other three wingers at the club, one will play as an emergency striker, one is sitting at home having got injured playing for Norwich and the other will be sentenced today for his second drink driving offence in a year.
-So at the moment we have one winger playing as an emergency striker, no partner for him and no wingers.
-We do have our captain and number one (hang on, won’t go there) midfielder fit.
-But the other two big cheeses in the middle of the park (Edu and Gilberto) are on the treatment table.
-We also have our 17 year-old Spaniard who has already played 35 games this season (twice as many as originally intended).
-And we have the generally impressive Flamini.
-At the back, we’re still missing Sol Campbell, which anyone who has been unlucky enough to see us try and defend recently will realise is a bad thing.
-We have a centre back that’s just been moved mysteriously out to right-back.
-And a right-back who’s just been moved to the bench.
-Pascal Cygan is occupying one of their positions.
-And finally, you may have noticed our goalkeeping situation isn’t the best at the moment.
As Arsenal Times brilliantly put it: “The good news is we have three quite decent right backs to choose from." And it would be four were Justin Hoyte not… injured.
So, we can expect some little shit to kick the remaining attackers we have in the team out of the game within five minutes of kick-off. And no doubt someone will react, touch their hand across a Sheffield United face and get sent-off.
I don’t know – it all just feels a bit ominous to me: They were the last lower league side to beat us a decade ago and during that time they’ve given us more shit than anyone else, whether it be justifiably complaining about the Overmars throw-in goal in 1999 or whining ridiculously about a foul that occurred about a minute before Freddie scored the winner in the 2003 semi-final.
It looks like either Lupoli or Quincy will start with Freddie. It should be pointed out that the boss has said that Aliadiere isn’t yet properly fit and so can’t play from the start. But then again it didn’t seem to matter in last year’s semi-final. I’d then plump for Clichy on the left and perhaps Eboue wide on the right, though Cesc could get a game. What he does with the defence we shall see – though Manuel Almunia is expected to play.
Either way, this is going to be a hard game on a cold night in front of a crowd who know they’re on TV and will be baying for blood. The nation’s scribes no doubt have their pencils sharpened to a point ready to declare us the famed ‘crisis club’ and to pronounce the end of the Wenger dynasty.
So tonight we need to make sure we keep our heads and yet also show true commitment and a willingness to fight for the cause – all values that have been questioned sometimes fairly and sometimes unfairly in recent weeks.
Perhaps it’s worth remembering what George Graham said to the team on the 1991 Champions video in the aftermath of that year’s tete a tete at Old Trafford: “You’ve still got to tackle, you’ve still got to close down, but lads, we must watch our behaviour.”
|
Archives: February 2005, January 2005, December 2004 and the embryonic goodplaya.
Click here to ensure you're seeing the most updated page on the site.
Latest playa ratings:
v Palace (5-1) - NEW
Jens: It’s tempting to say that the early back pass cock-up could just as easily have happened to Petr Cech but in truth that would be a lie. He’s simply too cocky and over confident with his kicking – it’s why so many balls get sliced wildly and why we almost conceded a shambolic own goal tonight. Otherwise, he actually did quite well. 6.5
Lauren: Is definitely becoming a better player going forward but was as culpable as anyone for our defensive malaise. 6
Cygan: Didn’t have an awful game but on too many occasions simple long balls forward by Palace became much more serious than they needed to be. 6
Kolo: Got skinned more often than he would have liked and was caught out at times from crosses. But still, we only conceded one. 6.5
Clichy: Did well getting forward, causing a constant menace. Defending was largely competent but seemed to be infected by the general defensive tendency to give the ball away. 6.5
Vieira: Another tricky game to rate from the captain. At times he was sluggish and easily caught in possession. At others, he took a grip on the game and drove the team forward impressively. Got well forward for his goal. 7
Edu: Didn’t have the sudden impact he enjoyed at Villa last week but did well enough and certainly gave us a fair bit of solidity. Good ball to Reyes for the opener. 7
Pires: Seemed to be rewriting the dictionary definition of anonymous for the first 20 or so minutes. Then got more into the game without coming close to hitting top gear. Was unlucky to hit the post in the 2nd half after good work from Reyes. 7
Reyes: His best game in yonks. He looked fearless again, running constantly at the Palace defence and causing a lot of trouble. Good assist for the first, great finish for the second, an assist for the third and a fantastic pass to Dennis to set up the fifth. Great to see him back again. 8.5
Dennis: As ever, he oiled, moulded and sculpted our performance. He also took his goal very well, like he did against Newcastle and United too. And set up Henry for the fifth. 7.5
Henry: Really played very, very well and channelled any frustration about constant offside decisions in exactly the right way. Had seemingly boundless energy to chase back lost causes and put us back on the attack. 8.5
Subs:
Flamini (for Edu 60odd): Solid and composed as ever. 7
Van Persie (for Dennis 80odd): Linked up reasonably well as the game entered its final stages. 7
Fabregas (for Pires 80odd): Settled in comfortably on the right. 7
v Wolves (2-0)
Jens: Whilst a clean sheet is a clean sheet, he had very little to do and looked no more reassuring than previously with his kicking. To be fair, he was also played a high number of over hit back passes today and was not at fault for the one from Flamini that took a wicked bobble off the Highbury surface (which appeared unusually cut-up).6.5
Eboue: Got forward well, hit the bar with a deflected shot and could have had a penalty. Nice work. 8
Clichy: Decent game without being exceptional.7
Sol: Not a lot to do. 7
Cygan: Better than usual. 8
Paddy: Mediocre for much of it truth be told. Got better later on and scored the penalty but for too long his mind didn’t seem in the right place. Sure, Wolves made it difficult by crowding midfield but too often he seemed semi asleep at throw ins and the like. Still, he kept going. 6.5
Flamini: Didn’t show the deftness of touch of the Newcastle game but retained all his normal solidity. And great as Ray Parlour was, watching Boro at the moment suggests that we’ve got an as good, if not better, replacement. 7
Reyes: A couple of good runs, some moments of anonymity and denied a stonewall penalty. Still getting back to form but it definitely seems better than a few weeks ago. 6.5
Freddie: Usual energetic performance without any stand out moments, save his well taken goal. That’s ten for the season now and we’re still in January. Good work Sir. 7
Van Persie: Not his most inspiring game and clearly doesn’t yet have the positional ability of Dennis (who does?) but is improving. 6.5
Henry: Gallic. Went into one of his moods after Riley ruled out his cheeky first half effort. Strutted around for a while, went in for a couple of silly tackles and became frankly self indulgently petulant when a foul was given against him. It’s alright for us to loathe Riley endlessly but our top striker shouldn’t let him affect his game. And the fact is he did. But recovered his composure, was unlucky not to score and set up Freddie in superb fashion. 8
Subs:
Cesc (for Van Persie): Settled in comfortably on the right. 7
Pires (for Reyes): Nice work for the clinching goal. 7
Quincy (for Fred): No time to make an impression.
v Charlton (3-1)
Alumnia: No chance with the goal and didn’t do too much wrong besides one poor fumble from a cross. Still not convinced by his catching techniques. No difficult saves to make6.5
Hoyte: Made the odd error but did well to make sure his old youth team buddy Jerome Thomas had his quietest game in weeks. Managed to get forward a bit more in the second half.7.5
Cole: Still not looking at his best and on a couple of occasions was embarrassed by Rommedahl. But in fairness he wasn’t as sloppy as recently and did get forward well later on. 6.5
Sol: With the exception of one wildly sliced clearance in the first half that Almunia had to save he looked pretty solid and kept Charlton’s clear chances to a minimum. Let’s hope his ankle isn’t too bad. 7
Kolo: Given a bit of grief by Bartlett in the air but stuck to his task well and like Campbell, restricted the number of clear cut chances. 7
Vieira: Watching the game live, I was unconvinced by his first half performance. But having just seen the highlights it seems he got through a lot of work and did what he had to do neatly and efficiently. Set up Fred well for the goal and kept up a good level of performance all the way through.7
Cesc: Lost the odd ball but was generally very sound. Passing was clean and crisp as ever and his touch for the second goal was exquisite by any standards.7.5
Freddie: Took his two goals brilliantly, worked hard and always looked a threat. In good form. 8
Clichy: Seemed to lose the ball cheaply a bit too often but worked hard down the left helping Cole out with nullifying the threat of Rohmedahl and getting forward well. Has tremendous energy which comes in handy at the end of games when opposition players tire.6.5
Henry: Not at his best today but more worrying than the actual performance was the fact that his normal fitness wasn’t there. Had a lovely free-kick cleared off the line.6.5
Van Persie: Still has a tendency to twist and turn once too often. But also holds the ball up brilliantly, moves it well and finished superbly for the third. Should probably be given a real run up front next to Henry. Took his goal like a striker, which is disconcerting coming from an Arsenal player.7.5
Subs:
Pires (for Van Persie 72ish): With the game won he wisely didn’t over exert himself ahead of Man City on Tuesday night. 6.5
Senderos (for Campbell 82ish): Slotted in well on his Premiership debut.7
Pennant (for Fred 86): Didn’t have time to get into the game. 7
v Newcastle (1-0)
Almunia: Our star man tonight. A smart early save from Ameobi (even if it was probably going wide) and excellent handling all night gave us one less worry. Four clean sheets in five and he also kicks a fair bit better than Jens.7
Lauren: Though Lauren Robert didn’t reach anything like his best, I’m not sure whether too much credit should go to Lauren. His positioning often seemed weak, his passing and tackling little better and he offered almost nothing in attack. Mr Average was distinctly poor. 5.5
Cole: Whilst there’s no shame in being given a tough time of things by Craig Bellamy, Cole’s performance was noticeably worse than just a torrid time. He made stupid, unnecessary fouls, got caught out when he should normally have had enough pace and looked very, very shaky. He may have been pushed a touch for the penalty incident, but a defender with his mind fully on the job wouldn’t have allowed the ball to hit him as blatantly as it did. In mitigation he did improve and unlike Lauren provided some attacking threat. 5.5
Kolo: Did alright but like the others his decision making didn’t always seem to be the best informed. That said, it’s a little harsh to chastise a central defender who has kept four clean sheets in five. 6.5
Sol: Urgh. After some very sound recent performances he seemed far too troubled by what looked like some relatively simple long balls. One such error allowed Ameobi in for his early chance and his lack of authority always made the long ball route look like a wise one for Newcastle to take. 6
Flamini: Not his best game for Arsenal but he still got through a lot of work, kept things simple and had a hand in setting up Vieira for the goal. 6.5
Vieira: Named man of the match by SKY and praised in a couple of papers, but I’m going to be honest and say that up until he scored I thought he was pretty useless, being caught in possession too often. That said in the second half he got through a fair bit of work as we ground out victory. 6.5
Fred: Beavered away, had some good moments and kept on trying. Was going to commend him for his work on a couple of occasions in particular but can’t now remember what they were. 7
Pires: Even by his standards, his tackling was poor today. Truth be told, I can’t fathom how he’s allowed to defend with his body constantly side on to the play. As a left winger he has defensive responsibilities and simply has to make a better fist of it. On the attacking front he was probably our most creative player, moving the ball smartly and at pace. 6
Van Persie: Still very, very raw. Unlucky not to score in the opening minutes and had a couple more decent efforts but all too frequently ran into trouble and lost the ball on what was admittedly an awful surface completely unsuited to his quick twists and turns. Corners weren’t bad. Needs time. 6.5
Henry: His touch was not quite at its magical best, but again this was probably due to the state of the pitch. Had a couple of good runs that resulted in decent shots on Shay Given’s goal. 6.5
Subs:
Clichy (for Van Persie 80 mins approx): Seemed as happy as anyone in the post match huddle but for the second game in succession he seemed a little out of sorts when called upon. 6
v Fulham (2-0)
Almunia: Looks better by the game and made a crucial save when he rushed out at speed to palm away a Fulham chance at 1-0. Made no notable mistakes. 7
Clichy: Had a good first half – getting forward well as usual and strong on the defensive stuff. Then in the second half he seemed to lose his confidence went, either as a result of or because of Fulham consistently probing down our left. Like any small full-back, aerial strength is a weakness.6
Lauren: Average as usual. Looked solid against a Fulham attack lacking any real penetration. 6.5
Sol: At times we were troubled in the air – but Sol is leading a defence that is no longer allowing attackers completely free headers at corners. Looks fit and healthy and, along with the rest of the defence, now has three clean sheets in four league games. 7
Freddie: A fine game on his return from migraine troubles. Played in Henry for the first and set-up Pires for the second. 7.5
Cesc: Gets caught on the ball occasionally but is still doing the vast majority of things with real fluency. Gives us real creativity in the middle. 7
Vieira: Showed a few soft shoe shuffles to bamboozle defenders in a way we haven’t really seen this season. Also got stuck into his tackles and generally seemed to be on the ball. 7
Pires: There was this surreal moment in the first half. He got the ball on the left wing and took a heavy touch. As if that wasn’t enough he then went flying into the tackle with the Fulham defender and actually won the ball. And it wasn’t the only time – I saw him snuff out a few Fulham attacks and even win a header.
Of course, the attacking side of his play was superb as well – he would have scored from a Dennis chest down but for a good save by Van De Saar. He linked up well, particularly with Henry, and inevitably took his goal with typical aplomb. Now has 19 in 2004, which is good. 7.5
Dennis: A fair few poor touches and bad decision making in general play. In mitigation, he dummied the ball well for the second goal and put Pires in with an excellent chest down. 6.5
Henry: Sure, the flicks didn’t always come off but at times he led Fulham a merry dance like he has almost every other defence this season. His goal was a trade mark finish and he was desperately unlucky when his side footer from the edge of the box crashed back off a post. 7
Subs:
Flamini (for Freddie 74ish): Some might say Arsene was making a point by not replacing Freddie with Pennant. Others will call it a sensible way of seeing out the game. 6.5
Van Persie (for Dennis 78ish): Provided his usual array of tricks but didn’t get a real chance to score. 6.5
v Portsmouth (1-0)
Almunia: Had a really good game. Caught when he needed to catch, punched when he wasn't sure and kicked immaculately. Also made a couple of really good saves. His run of impressive performances may only stretch to two but for now there seems no reason to bring back Jens. 8
Lauren: Did nothing too wrong but didn't offer as much in attack as he might have and at times appeared troubled by Pomey's pace. I think he's ok, but I'm becoming less and less convinced he should be our right back at all - more on that tomorrow. 6.5
Cole: A tough one to call. For a while looked rattled by Pompey's pace and agression down the left. Misplaced a couple of balls and though his tackles were mostly coming off they had a slightly concerning aggressiveness about them which made me think he was letting his own frustration get the better of him a little. But stuck to the task well and in the end kept a dangerous Pompey out. 7
Kolo: Got sucked in a couple of times, but on the whole he was part of a defence that looked pretty solid and much improved at set pieces. 7
Sol: Looked fitter than recently I thought - turning smoothly on a couple of occasions when faced with danger. He also made countless important headers at corners and won us the game with the kind of head down sheer determinism many fans would like to see a little more often. 8
Flamini: Ran hard, tackled hard and never gave up. Doesn't offer as much going forward as Fabregas, but doesn't claim to either. Unlucky with a header from Henry's free-kick. 7
Vieira: Industrious, but was also sloppy on occasion, getting caught in posession and losing the ball. Still doesn't seem 100% back to his best and didn't make the most of a couple of shooting opportunities. 6.5
Clichy: Fought well and offered Cole valuable protection down the left hand side. Showed initial attacking promise early on but faded as Pompey grew in stature. Nonetheless, was full of running at the end and nearly capitalised on tired Pompey legs. 7
Pires: His every touch was met with a chorus of boos as Bob faced Pompey for the first time since 'that dive' last season. There was even one moment when he slipped and the ball rolled out of play. Which probably made a certain journalist very, very warm inside. Otherwise, was neat enough but pretty ineffectual, seemingly afraid of injury in the rough house atmosphere. Had a couple of lovely runs late on and set Dennis up for a chance he really should have taken. 6.5
Henry: Worked hard and created much of our best work, but often found himself crowded out by the hoardes of Pompey defenders. Nearly scored after a flowing first half move and set up Dennis' other chance late on, which again he really should have taken. 7
Van Persie: Started really well, showing fantastic feet and trickery and generally leading Pompey a merry dance. He swivels at such speed he'll probably need a hip replacement aged 30. Faded somewhat after his impressive start, finding himself crowded out by the packed defence. Could pass a little earlier at times but nonetheless a decent first start in a difficult game and he staked a fair claim for inclusion against Fulham on Boxing Day. 6.5
Subs:
Bergkamp (for Van Persie 68ish): Should have scored late on following good set up play. His performance did little to silence the voices calling for this year to be his last. I'm undecided on that, but what I am sure about is that I won't miss the needless little kicks and elbows aimed at his opponents when frustration sets in. Simply put: the sly digs are ugly and Van Nistelrooy like and do nothing for us. 6
v Chelsea (2-2)
Almunia: Faultless for both their goals, he made good stops from Lampard and Gudjohnsen in the first half. And made a vital save when Robben wriggled his way through after the break. But nobody noticed it. Caught when a catch was a good idea, punched when a punch was wiser and set us on the attack with some good throws. 7.5
Lauren: Didn't see much of him, but when you're up against Duff and Robben, this can only be to a defender's credit. Thought he did really well to keep them in check, and the one time Robben did really threaten in the second half, the danger came down the other side. 7.5
Cole: The one player who I thought struggled today. As has been the case of late, he lacked confidence in his touch and stuggled defensively. Perhaps should have come out to Robben before the winger got into the box for his 2nd half chance, and was easily beaten in the air by Drogba for Cheslea's 2nd equaliser. 6
Kolo: Looked solid overall and helped limit Chelsea to only a few chances asides from set pieces. 7
Sol: A mixed bag. Made some really important defensive headers and looked in command at times at the back. But was a little caught out for their opening goal and sometimes seemed a little gung ho in his marking. Made important late tackle on Drogba.7
Reyes: Was quiet, but this was a tough game. Nodded down to Henry for the opener, worked hard and went on a few mazy runs without much success. Still, I thought he gave them something to worry about.6.5
Fabregas: Another excellent performance. He and Flamini were overwhelmed initially when up against Tiago, Lampard and Makalele but never gave up and fought their way back into the game admirably. Nice goal to set up Henry for the opener, he was instrumental in setting up the Frenchman's near winner and also set up RVP for his chance. Uses the ball so intelligently and showed that despite his size, he's not afraid to get stuck in. Was up against the very best in the business today and succeeded in limiting Lampard to a largely peripheral role.8
Flamini: £1 million? First league start? A snip if you ask me. He run's tirelessly, he harries, he puts his foot in and he uses the ball simply when he wins it. A real water carrier but absolutely essential today and worked tirelessly. Well done Sir. 8
Pires: We wanted a big performance and boy did we get one. Seemed almost impossible to shake off the ball, tackled back, linked up well with Lauren, Flamini, Cesc and Henry and drove the team forward in his own idiosyncratic waddle. When in his pomp, he is still a wonderful, wonderful footballer to watch. Set up Henry for the near winner, realised his responsibility as the senior partner in midfield, and shouldered the responsibility admirably.7.5
Dennis: Didn't get involved in too much of note, but I can't help feeling he just gives us a cetain sophistication and shape when he's in the side. Gordon Strachan pointed out on Match of the Day how hard he'd worked to stop Makalele getting the ball and in hindsight I think it probably a fair call.6.5
Henry: Forget the late miss - it can happen to anyone. Otherwise he was outstanding, scoring a brilliant first (which included winning a high ball!), netting an impudent second and generally running the show. Scared Chelsea shitless every time he picked it up and was responsible for a hell of a lot of good work. Also destroyed the concept he doesn't turn it on in big games. That's 15 in 17 league games now by the way.9
Subs:
Clichy (for Reyes 82): Ran around like mad for 10 minutes and forced mistakes out of tired legs. Really good footballer and good enough to start for probably every Premiership side and perhaps should be more often for us. 7.5
RVP: Is maturing very nicely indeed. Nearly netted a silky winner when he latched onto Cesc's pass and gave the Chelsea players a lot to think about. Would be really interesting to see him start. 7
v Rosenberg (5-1)
Almunia: Made a really, really good low save early on and kicked largely well. But looked dodgy more than once on crosses and for the second time in a week cost us a goal, which is a real worry. Eventually realised there's nothing wrong with giving a ball a good double handed punch. 6
Hoyte: Was up against a poor opposition but defended diligently and rarely looked rushed. Used the ball well, linked up well with his team mates and should be well pleased with his first European start. 7
Cole: Looked solid, with a couple of important defensive headers, but still not yet back to his marauding best I sense. Shouldn't have let the ball drop over his head for Harald Brattbakk to fire at Alumnia after 17 minutes. Withdrawn with quarter of an hour left. 6.5
Sol: Ditto for above, though did once later on look somewhat sluggish again on the turn. Perhaps I'm just paranoid about the impending arrival of Duff and Robben at Highbury.6.5
Kolo: A very easy night for the big man and he even found time for a classic Kolo dance into the opposition penalty area towards the end. 7
Flamini: Very, very good full debut. Set up the second goal, ran tirelessly, got tackles in and seemed to work well with Cesc in midfield. Looks comfortable tracking back and going forward and also seems to have a strange affinity for joining in attacks right around the right edge of the penalty area and particularly when we attack the North Bank. A young, thinking man's Gilles Grimandi, he ain't at all bad for a fifth choice midfielder. 7.5
Cesc: Absolute star. Has already played 20 games this season (twice as many as Edu, Gilberto and Vieira), yet still had the strength to turn in one of his best performances for the club. Fantastically alert, his use of the ball was excellent. He also scored a very impressive, very difficult goal and was involved in the build up for the fifth. Not just our most frequent performer in midfield this season, but also our best. 8
Jose: Took his goal really well and gave us a flying start. Had another deflected shot well saved and looked much more like the sun kid of the beginning of the season. Had a delightful late chip that bamboozled three very stupid looking Rosenberg players before landing on the roof of the net. 7
Pires: Looked much, much better and was even spotted making a tackle late in the second half. Kept going and linked up well late on with Jose and RVP before being withdrawn for Quincy with two minutes left. His penalty was so brilliantly placed it went into the side netting. Again I marvel at his ability to put a football exactly where he wants it to go. 7
Bergkamp: A nice return for the Ice Man who got involved well in the game, set up the opener and had a couple of openings himself. Might have done better when in front of goal, but eased himself back into the side well. 7
Henry: I actually thought that poor as the defending was for his goal, it was still a pretty decent finish. Worked hard all night, linked up well with the kids around him and seemed to be feeling particularly tolerant. 7
Subs:
Clichy (for Dennis 72ish): Spent a few mins in midfield before dropping back to left back when RVP replaced Ashley. As ever looked sound in the defending and assured going forward.
7
RVP (for Cole 75): Resuscitated the game with some silky skills, wayward finishing and then eventually a very well taken goal. Rawer than an uncooked vegetable, but with massive potential. 7.5
Quincy (for Bob 88): Should have had longer. Don't think he got a touch.
v Birmingham (3-0)
Alumnia: Looks like Lehman, kicks slightly better than Lehman, fumbles the odd ball like Lehman and jumps a couple of inches less high in the air than Lehman. Did ok, but would have been ill advised to let Morrison’s second half effort creep under him and over the line.6.5
Lauren: Seemed really quiet yesterday. Means he was doing his defensive job well which at the moment is the priority. Better? Seeing as we kept a clean sheet, probably a tad. 6.5
Cole: It's not been picked up much by the press, but I’ve thought Ash to be one of the players whose form has most obviously dipped in the recent spell. He’s still looked a top left back, but the subtlety of touch that allowed him and Bob to link so well still seems to be absent. Better? Not noticeably, but again should take credit for a clean sheet. 7
Sol: I’m of the opinion he’s still carrying a little bit of weight. Played well enough, but on a couple of occasions he looked sluggish and immobile on the turn, which is obviously a concern with Duff and Robben coming to town next week. Better? Probably not. 6.5
Kolo: Probably fair to say he’s not been our worst performer in the recent period, but I think on occasion he has allowed our recent jitters to affect his decision making a little. Kept Heskey quiet, but also seemed to time his jumps wrongly on a couple of occasions. Better? Ditto above. 7
Vieira: Did some good stuff but on other occasions his decision making and concentration again seemed lacking a little. He’s a hard one to judge at the moment. Better? Probably a bit.7
Cesc: I’m glad to see he escaped censure for his recent performances because I think a lot of the recent mutterings about how he’s no Gilberto have been unfair. Admittedly, the Brazilian’s best work is done off the ball, SKY’s stats show how we tend to win with him in the side, but I still think the young Spaniard is doing pretty well. He’s a young boy whose probably played too many games in a struggling team in a big league. But he’s still there, still getting stuck in and still doing his stuff. Tired in the latter stages yesterday and was replaced by Flamini, which was a wise, common sense, decision. Better? No, but only because he was doing well in the first place. 7
Freddie: Scavenged, burrowed, furrowed, ducked and dived. Fred’s doing them all at the moment and its working as the perfect complement to the continued attempts at perfection that come from the rest of the team. Is also being very productive. Should have had a penalty yesterday, set up the third goal and generally ran the show. Better? No, but only because he’s been great. 7.5
Pires: Mark my words. One of these days the opposition are going to get a free kick on the edge of our area. Their player will hit it, the ball will fly off Robert Pires and zip past Lehman. And we’ll all put it down as a fluke, like we did for Graveson’s effort that flew off Pennant in the Carling Cup game against Everton. Except it won’t be a fluke because Pires, like Pennant, will have jumped with his back to the ball, meaning that when it hits him he’ll have no way of giving it any direction.
My point is that Pires simply has to go into tackles. Maybe he’s worried about getting hurt, but he’s ducking out of the most basic challenges and its meaning we’re losing the battle in midfield at places like Old Trafford and Anfield.
Obviously, as I was making a note of this, Bob went and scored a classic Bob goal. Basically a really, really good one. He is a fantastic playa, probably the purest footballer we have in our team and quite possibly the best finisher. Yesterday was his 50th goal for the club and almost without exception (Bolton at home this season) they’ve been aesthetically perfect and a joy to watch.
But he must pull his weight for the team, which funnily enough I’ve seen him do really well on a number of occasions. Better? A little bit later on in the second half. 6.5
Reyes: You have to feel for him - seemingly everything he tries seems to go askew these days. Inches away from a Henry cross in the first half, he got into the game a bit more going towards half time, but then tired before being withdrawn. As I said above, he could do with a 25 minute run against tired defences to get his confidence back. Better? Not really, but not for want of effort. 6.5
Henry: Whether it be through injury or lack of confidence, he spent much of the game getting into decent positions but then making the wrong decision. Then ten minutes from time he took off past Melchiot, through the Birmingham defence and then a cool low finish hit whilst he was running at incredible speed. Six minutes later, he bought a ticket for Freddie Ljungberg’s cross and got lucky.
May not be at his best. But the level of criticism he of all people has taken is ridiculous. Has scored 13 league goals this season (four more than anyone else and 9 more than Ruud), scoring in 11 of the 16 games. And it’s not even like he’s bound to get the goals because nobody else does. He hasn’t even scored a third of our goals, and with the exception of Old Trafford (when nobody scored) and Selhurst Park, at least one other Arsenal player has scored in all of our other games.
Better? Yes. Despite earlier failures, his determination to keep going for the all important second goal was admirable. 7.5
Subs:
Clichy (for Jose): I love this guy. He’s like Wenger’s little foot soldier and seems capable of doing everything. Slotted in expertly in left midfield. He covers, chases back, tackles, retains the ball, gets forward, dribbles and causes havoc in the opposition defence. He may be more defensive than Reyes, but sometimes being slightly more defensive can give you the shape to attack more. May not be suited to central midfield, but should be considered a serious option for a place in left midfield on tough away games. 7.5
Flamini: Seems to do everything neatly enough without being spectacular. Will be interesting to see how he works with Cesc over the next two games.7
v Man United (0-1)
Alumnia: Crap on their goal, barely put a foot wrong otherwise. Plays and looks like a slightly smaller Jens, but can kick. 6
Hoyte: OK and defended well on occasion, but I’d still like to see him get forward more. That said, I think he’s a player who would look much better surrounded by seasoned pros. 6.5
Clichy: Really, really good as usual. Slipped on their excuse of a pitch for the early goal, but didn’t let it affect him and worked tirelessly defending and attacking all game. 7.5
Senderos: The lumbering giant of Everton had been replaced by a very, very accomplished looking centre half. One dodgy back header that fell short but otherwise cut out everything that was asked of him and looked a real first team option. 8
Djorou: Took eye off ball and then slipped for the goal which wasn’t good. Never quite looked the same player as against Everton, but worked his way back into the game. 6.5
Flamini: Looks like we can breathe a little more easily in the midfield department after watching a very assured display. Would like to see him trialled as a sub for Freddie in games where we’ve got a dodgy one goal lead. 7
Larsson: Some like him but I’m not so sure. What he did was decent enough but I thought he struggled to have an effect on the game. 6.5
Quincy: Maybe it was the pitch, maybe it was United doubling up on him. Either way the hero of the last round never really got into last night’s affair. 6
Pennant: Worked hard, tried to take the initiative and overall did quite well. Still not sure if he’ll quite make it at Highbury though. 7
Lupoli: Is a striker and when strikers get no service they don’t look much kop. 6.5
Van Persie: Battled hard all night and willingly came deep to win possession. But probably came a bit too deep and battled a bit too hard. Yes, he could have been sent off for the incident with Richardson. Reminds me a bit of a young Freddie, not in playing style but in the way that the potential is clearly there but the skills are still very, very raw. 6.5
Subs:
Smith (for Lupoli): Did OK but still looks wary of going in for challenges and taking men on following his long term injury.
Cregg: Alright
Karbassiyoon: Alright
|
| |