ICC Games

 









 

 


 

(1) M.J. Yeo - M. Devereaux [B33]
ICC v Oxford U., Oxford, 1996

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 e5 6.Ndb5 d6 7.Bg5 a6 8.Na3 b5 9.Bxf6 gxf6 10.Nd5 f5 11.Nxb5 axb5 12.Bxb5 Bd7 13.exf5 Rb8 14.a4 Nd4 15.Bxd7+ Kxd7 16.a5 Rg8 17.c3 Nb3 18.a6 Rxg2 19.a7 Qh4 20.Nf6+ Ke7 21.Qxd6+ Kxd6 22.axb8Q+ 1-0



 









 

 


 

(2) R.J.D. Tozer - Dr J.T. Farrand [A42]
ICC IOC Ombudsmen v Cornhill/JTW, 1997

1.d4 d6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 Nc6 5.d5 Nd4 6.Nge2 c5 7.Be3 Qb6 8.Nxd4 cxd4 9.Na4 Qa5+ 10.Bd2 Qc7 11.c5 Nf6 12.cxd6 Qxd6 13.Bd3 0-0 14.Rc1 e6 15.dxe6 Bxe6 16.Nc5 Rac8 17.Bb4 b6 18.Na6 Qf4 19.0-0 Ng4 20.g3 Qh6 21.h4 Nxf2 22.Kxf2 Qe3+ 23.Kg2 Rxc1 24.Qxc1 Qxd3 25.Bxf8 Bxf8 26.Nc7 Bd6 27.Rf3 Qe2+ 28.Rf2 Qxe4+ 29.Kg1 Bxg3 30.Rg2 Bf4 31.Re2 Be3+ 32.Rxe3 Qxe3+ 33.Qxe3 dxe3 34.a3 Bc4 35.Ne8 f5 36.Nd6 b5 37.a4 a6 38.b4 Be2 39.h5 f4 0-1



 









 

 


 

(3) I.D. Hunnable - M. Groom [A84]
ICC v Legal League - Bronowski Trophy 1, 1997

1.Nf3 f5 2.d4 e6 3.c4 Nf6 4.g3 Bb4+ 5.Bd2 Be7 6.Nc3 0-0 7.Bg2 d6 8.Qc2 a5 9.0-0 Nc6 10.a3 Qe8 11.Rad1 Qg6 12.Bc1 d5 13.cxd5 Nxd5 14.Ne5 Nxe5 15.dxe5 c6 16.e4 Nb6 17.Ne2 Qf7 18.Be3 Nd7 19.f4 g5 20.exf5 exf5 21.Kh1 gxf4 22.gxf4 Kh8 23.Qc3 Kg8 24.Rg1 h6 25.Bd5+ 1-0



 









 

 


 

(4) A.G.C. Paish - D. Malcolm [C86]
ICC Ch. 1997/98, 1998

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.0-0 Be7 6.Qe2 b5 7.Bb3 0-0 8.c3 d5 9.d3 Re8 10.a4 b4 11.cxb4 Bg4 12.Nbd2 Nd4 13.Qe3 Bxf3 14.gxf3 Bxb4 15.Bd1 Nh5 16.Kh1 Bc5 17.Qe1 Nf4 18.Nb3 Nxd3 19.Qd2 Nxb3 20.Bxb3 dxe4 21.fxe4 Qd4 22.Qe3 Rab8 23.Qxd4 Bxd4 24.Bc4 Nc5 25.f3 Rb4 26.Bd5 Reb8 27.Ra2 Rxa4 28.Rxa4 Nxa4 29.f4 Nb6 30.Ba2 c5 31.fxe5 c4 32.b3 Bxe5 33.bxc4 Nd7 34.c5 Nf6 35.Rf5 Re8 36.Bc4 g6 37.Rf3 Rc8 38.Bg5 Rxc5 39.Bxf6 Bxf6 40.Bxa6 Be5 41.Rf2 Rc7 42.Kg2 f6 43.Rd2 Kf7 44.Bd3 Ke6 45.Rc2 Bc3 46.Kf3 Ke5 47.Ke3 Bd4+ 48.Kf3 Ra7 49.Rc8 Bg1 50.Re8+ Kd4 51.Rd8+ Kc3 52.Kg2 Bd4 53.Bf1 Ra2+ 54.Kh3 Be5 55.Bg2 Ra3 56.Bf1 Kc2+ 57.Kg2 Bf4 58.Rh8 Ra7 59.Rf8 Bg5 60.Rd8 Ra4 61.Rd7 h6 62.Rg7 Rxe4 63.Rxg6 Kd2 64.h3 Ke3 65.Rg8 f5 66.Ra8 f4 67.Ra3+ 1/2-1/2



 









 

 


 

(5) D.R. Sedgwick - G.W. Naldrett [C24]
ICC Championship 5.1.98, 1998

1.e4 e5 2.Bc4 Nf6 3.Nc3 Be7 4.f4 d6 5.Nf3 Nc6 6.d4 exd4 7.Nxd4 Nxd4 8.Qxd4 Be6 9.0-0 0-0 10.Bxe6 fxe6 11.Qc4 d5 12.Qb3 b6 13.f5 exf5 14.exd5 Kh8 15.Rxf5 Bc5+ 16.Kh1 Ng4 17.Rf4 Qh4 18.Rxf8+ Rxf8 19.Bf4 Nf2+ 20.Kg1 Nd1+ 0-1



 









 

 


 

(6) Dr. J.T. Farrand - D.L. Barrett [D00]
ICC Inter-Office Competition - E Star/A, 1998

1.d4 Nf6 2.Nc3 d5 3.e4 dxe4 4.f3 Bf5 5.fxe4 Nxe4 6.Qf3 Nd6 7.Bf4 Qd7 8.Bxd6 cxd6 9.Bb5 Nc6 10.d5 Rc8 11.dxc6 bxc6 12.Bd3 Bg4 13.Qf2 e5 14.h3 Be6 15.Nf3 Be7 16.0-0-0 0-0 17.Nxe5 Qb7 18.Nf3 Rb8 19.b3 Qb4 20.Nb1 Bf6 21.Qd2 Qc5 22.Rhe1 Bxb3 23.axb3 Rxb3 24.c4 Rxb1+ 25.Bxb1 Qa3+ 26.Kc2 Rb8 27.Re8+ Rxe8 28.Rc1 Qa4+ 29.Kd3 Qb3+ 30.Rc3 Bxc3 31.Qc1 Bb2+ 0-1



 









 

 


 

(7) A. Freedman - D.J.E. Harris [B01]
ICC Inter-Office Competition 1998/99, 1998

1.e4 d5 2.exd5 Qxd5 3.Nc3 Qa5 4.Nf3 Nf6 5.Bc4 Bg4 6.h3 Bh5 7.d3 c6 8.Bd2 Qc7 9.Qe2 e6 10.0-0-0 a5 11.g4 Bg6 12.Ne5 b5 13.f4 bxc4 14.f5 cxd3 15.Nxd3 Nd5 16.fxg6 hxg6 17.a3 Nd7 18.Qf2 N7b6 19.Rdf1 Nc4 20.Nxd5 cxd5 21.Bc3 Ra7 22.Re1 Rb7 23.Qd4 Qc6 24.Nf4 Rd7 25.Qd3 g5 26.Nh5 Rxh5 27.gxh5 f6 28.Qg6+ Kd8 29.h6 gxh6 30.Qxf6+ Be7 31.Qxh6 Bxa3 32.bxa3 Nxa3 33.Qf8+ Kc7 34.Be5+ Kb7 35.Qxa3 d4 36.Kd2 Rd5 37.Rb1+ Kc8 38.Qf8+ Rd8 39.Rb8+ 1-0



 









 

 


 

(8) Dr J.T. Farrand - Z Harari [D01]
ICC v Cavendish, Eastman Plate Final, 1999

1.d4 d5 2.Nc3 Bf5 3.f3 Nf6 4.Bg5 c5 5.e4 dxe4 6.d5 Qa5 7.Bxf6 exf6 8.fxe4 Bd7 9.Nf3 Bd6 10.Be2 0-0 11.0-0 b5 12.a4 b4 13.Nb5 Bf4 14.Nd2 Bxb5 15.Rxf4 Bxe2 16.Qxe2 Nd7 17.Nc4 Qa6 18.Qd3 Nb6 19.Nd6 Qxd3 20.cxd3 Rfd8 21.Nf5 Kf8 22.b3 g6 23.Ne3 Kg7 24.Raf1 Rd6 25.g4 Rf8 26.R4f2 Re8 27.g5 f5 28.Rxf5 Rd7 29.R5f2 Nc8 30.Ng4 Ree7 31.Rc2 Rc7 32.Rfc1 h5 33.gxh6+ Kh7 34.e5 f5 35.Nf6+ Kxh6 36.d6 1-0



 









 

 


 

(9) DR Sedgwick - KJ Thurlow [B20]
ICC v Civil Service, London 8.12.99, 1999

1.e4 c5 2.Bc4 e6 3.Qe2 Nc6 4.c3 a6 5.Bb3 Nge7 6.d3 d5 7.Bg5 d4 8.f4 Qc7 9.e5 Nf5 10.Nd2 h6 11.g4 hxg5 12.gxf5 gxf4 13.fxe6 Bxe6 14.Bxe6 fxe6 15.Ngf3 0-0-0 16.cxd4 cxd4 17.Nb3 Kb8 18.Rc1 Qb6 19.Rc4 Rh5 20.Nfxd4 Nxe5 21.Qxh5 Nxc4 22.dxc4 Rxd4 23.Qe5+ Rd6 24.c5 Qb4+ 25.Kf2 Ka8 26.cxd6 Bxd6 27.Qd4 1-0



 









 

 


 

(10) I.D. Hunnable - A Harakis [D00]
ICC v Drunken Knights, Eastman Plate Se, 1999

1.Nf3 Nf6 2.d4 g6 3.Nc3 d5 4.h3 Bg7 5.Bf4 0-0 6.e3 c5 7.dxc5 Qa5 8.Nd2 Nh5 9.Nxd5 Be6 10.Nxe7+ Kh8 11.Bd6 Rd8 12.b4 Qxb4 13.Rb1 Qa3 14.Rxb7 Na6 15.Nc6 Rxd6 16.cxd6 Bd5 17.Bxa6 Qxa6 18.Qb1 Bxc6 19.Rb8+ Bf8 20.Rxa8 Bxa8 21.Qb8 Qxd6 22.Qxa8 Kg7 23.Qxa7 Nf6 24.Qd4 Qa6 25.Qd3 1-0



 









 

 


 

(11) G. Luetchford - M.R. Wiltshire [C40]
ICC v Drunken Knights, Eastman Plate Se, 1999

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f5 3.Nc3 fxe4 4.Nxe4 d5 5.Ng3 Nc6 6.Bb5 Bd6 7.d3 Nf6 8.c4 0-0 9.cxd5 Nd4 10.Nxd4 exd4 11.0-0 a6 12.Bc4 Ng4 13.h3 Ne5 14.Ne4 Bxh3 15.f4 Bxg2 16.Kxg2 Ng6 17.Nxd6 cxd6 18.Qg4 Nh4+ 19.Kh3 Nf5 20.Bd2 Rf6 21.Qd1 Rg6 22.Qe1 Qd7 23.Kh2 Re8 24.Qd1 Qe7 25.Qe1 Qf7 26.Qf2 Rh6+ 27.Kg1 Qh5 0-1



 









 

 


 

(12) DR Sedgwick - S Essen [B07]
ICC Championship, 1999/2000, 2000

1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.Bc4 Bg7 5.Qe2 Nc6 6.e5 Nxd4 7.exf6 Nxe2 8.fxg7 Rg8 9.Ngxe2 c6 10.Bh6 d5 11.0-0-0 Bd7 12.Bb3 e6 13.h4 Qf6 14.Nf4 b5 15.Bg5 Qxg7 16.Nd3 Rc8 17.Rhe1 f6 18.Bf4 Kf7 19.Nc5 Rgd8 20.N3e4 dxe4 21.Rxd7+ Rxd7 22.Bxe6+ Ke7 23.Bxd7 Qh8 24.Rxe4+ Kf7 25.Be6+ Kg7 26.Bxc8 Qxc8 27.Re7+ Kg8 28.Nd7 1-0



 









 

 


 

(13) GW Naldrett - JH Aldred [D10]
ICC Championship, London, 2000

1.c4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Bg5 dxc4 5.a4 Qa5 6.Bxf6 exf6 7.e3 Be6 8.Nf3 Bb4 9.Qc1 Nd7 10.Nd2 Nb6 11.Be2 Qg5 12.0-0 Bh3 13.Bf3 Be6 14.Be2 h5 15.Nce4 Qg6 16.Nc5 Bg4 17.Re1 a5 18.Nxb7 h4 19.Bxg4 Qxg4 20.Qd1 Qg6 21.Qf3 Rc8 22.Ne4 f5 23.Nc3 0-0 24.e4 Qf6 25.Qxf5 Qxf5 26.exf5 Rb8 27.Nc5 Rbd8 28.Re4 Nd5 29.Rc1 Rfe8 30.f3 Ne3 31.Re1 Rxe4 32.fxe4 Nc2 33.Rd1 Rxd4 34.Rxd4 Nxd4 35.Na6 Bxc3 36.bxc3 Ne2+ 37.Kf2 Nxc3 38.Nc5 Kf8 39.Ke3 Ke7 40.Kd4 Nd1 41.Kxc4 Ne3+ 42.Kd4 Nxg2 43.Nb7 h3 44.Nxa5 Kd7 45.Nc4 f6 46.Kc5 Kc7 47.Nd6 Ne1 48.Ne8+ Kb7 49.Nxg7 Nf3 50.Nh5 Nxh2 51.Nxf6 Nf3 52.Ng4 Ne5 53.Nh2 Kc7 54.Kd4 Kd6 55.a5 c5+ 56.Kc3 Kc6 57.f6 Kb5 58.a6 Kxa6 59.Ng4 Nxg4 60.f7 h2 61.f8Q h1Q 62.Qa8+ Kb6 63.Qb8+ Kc6 64.Qa8+ Kb6 65.Qb8+ 1/2-1/2



 









 

 


 

(14) J MacNamara - O Wilander [C54]
ICC v CU 25.11.2000, Christ's College, , 2000

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.c3 Nf6 5.d4 exd4 6.cxd4 Bb4+ 7.Nc3 Nxe4 8.0-0 Nxc3 9.bxc3 Bxc3 10.Bxf7+ Kf8 11.Bg5 Ne7 12.Rc1 Bb4 13.Qb3 Bd6 14.Bh5 g6 15.Bh6+ Ke8 16.Ng5 Rf8 17.Bxf8 Nd5 18.Qxd5 Qf6 19.Bxd6 Qxd6 20.Qg8+ Ke7 21.Rfe1+ Qe6 22.Nxe6 1-0



 









 

 


 

(15) D Bevan - JH Aldred [C45]
Insurance v Batterseas - Board 9, Eastm, 2000

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 exd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nxc6 bxc6 6.e5 Qe7 7.Qe2 Nd5 8.c4 Nb6 9.Nc3 Qe6 10.Qe4 a5 11.a4 Bb4 12.Bd2 Ba6 13.b3 0-0 14.Bd3 g6 15.h4 d5 16.Qf4 Bd6 17.cxd5 cxd5 18.Bxa6 Bxe5 19.Qe3 d4 20.Qe2 dxc3 21.Be3 Qxb3 22.0-0 Bf6 23.Bxb6 Qxb6 24.Bb5 c6 25.Bd3 Rae8 26.Qg4 Qb4 27.Bc4 Qe7 28.Rfe1 Qxe1+ 29.Rxe1 Rxe1+ 30.Kh2 c2 31.h5 c1Q 32.hxg6 Rh1+ 33.Kg3 Bh4+ 34.Kf3 Qc3+ 0-1



 









 

 


 

(16) ID Hunnable - SJ Piper [A84]
Insurance v London Commercial League, B, 2000

1.Nf3 f5 2.d4 Nf6 3.c4 e6 4.g3 b6 5.Bg2 Bb7 6.0-0 Be7 7.Nc3 0-0 8.Bf4 Nh5 9.Bd2 d6 10.e3 Nf6 11.Rc1 h6 I now looked at 12 Ng5, which Black presumably thought he'd prevented. Having analysed it, I looked at something else and forgot return to consideration of Ng5! It's good: 12 ...Bxg2 13 Nxe6 Qc8 14 Nxf8 Bxf1 15 Ng6 and White emerges a pawn up with a good game. 12.Re1 Ne4 13.Rc2 Nd7 14.Bc1 Ndf6 15.Nh4 Kh7 16.d5 Cutting the long black bishop out of the scene. Slightly amusing: Black can only reduce the number of pieces I have covering d5 by ...Nxc3 which discloses another piece (the Bg2) in its stead! 16...g5 17.Nf3 Now if Black captures on c3 and then twice on d5, I have Nxg5+ discovering an attack on d5 to regain the piece. 17...e5 18.Nxe4 Nxe4 19.Nd2 Nf6 20.f3 ...with the offer of a draw. I didn't expect him to accept, but wanted to know how he was intending to handle his slightly over-extended K-side: block or open lines. If he was only going to close things up, we might as well agree the half now! He declined the offer with... 20...Qe8 21.e4 The point: if Black now plays 21 ...f4, I have to play 22 g4 and the only thing that can be opened then is the h-file. 21...Bc8 22.exf5 Bxf5 23.Ne4 Qg6 24.Rf2 Rf7 25.Nxf6+ Bxf6 26.g4 Now if Black retreats to, say, d7, I have 27 f4 with the threat Be4. So he must walk into my parlour, as the spider said to the fly. 26...Bd3 27.b3 Now the bishop is trapped, I thought. Its only way back is along the diagonal, but the queen can only make room by retreating to h7 which it cannot do before I've attacked the bishop a second time. However, I only now appreciated that Black has 23 ...b5! Even so, if 23 ...b5 24 cxb5 Bxb5 I have 25 f4 again. 27...Re8 Black fails to appreciate his peril and must now lose a piece. His 27 Re8 envisages supporting the bishop with ...e4 but the pawn is pinned! 28.Rd2 e4 29.Rxd3 exd3 30.Rxe8 Bd4+ 31.Kh1 Be5 32.Re6 1-0



 









 

 


 

(17) DIW Reynolds - S Essen [B07]
ICC Championship 2000/01, 2001

Comments by Ian Reynolds. 1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.Be2 Why let my knight get pinned when I want to push the rooks pawn? As you will see there are a lot of pawn moves! 4...Bg7 5.h4 c6 6.h5 b5 Now where will either king seek shelter? 7.a3 Possibly White's on the Q-side. 7...Nbd7 8.h6 Bf8 9.g4 The bishop has had to retreat, so why not the knight too! 9...e5 10.g5 Ng8 11.d5 Not only to pick up the pawn but also to open up the centre. My K-side pawns may fall at some stage but I do not expect to get into a lost ending without a go at his king first. 11...Bb7 Possibly 11...c5 as then the centre is blocked even though he goes a pawn down. 12.dxc6 Bxc6 13.Bxb5 Bxb5 14.Nxb5 Qa5+ 15.Nc3 f6 So the undermining of my K-side pawns starts. 16.Qd5 Qd8 Taking the queens off fails here as the knight recapture threatens to fork king and rook and allows gxf6 and I am a pretty good pawn up. 17.Qe6+ We decided after the game that the move he feared, 17.Nb5, was better: 17...Nb6 18.Qe6+ Be7 19.gxf6 Nxf6 20.Bg5 Rf8 21.O-O-O Nxe4 22.Bxe7 Qxe7 23.Nc7+ Kd8 24.Qxe7+ Kxe7 25.Nxa8 and White is the exchange up. 17...Be7 18.Nf3 Nc5 19.Qd5 Rc8 20.Rg1 Not sure if this is best but we did not find anything decisive. [Neither did Genius 5. It's best suggestion was 20.b4 Nd7 21.Nb5 Nb6 22.Qd3 a6 23.Na7 with an evaluation of 0.21 to White - not even a third of a pawn. -Ed.] 20...Qd7 21.Be3 Ne6 Maybe here he should start taking off my K-side pawns, eg 21...fxg5 22.Nxg5 Nxh6 23.O-O-O Bxg5 24.Bxg5 Nf7 25.Bf6 Rf8 26.Rg3 Qe6 27.Qxe6 Nxe6 28.Rh1 and now his K-side pawns are in danger. 22.0-0-0 Nxg5 A fatal mistake. After 22...Nc5 23.Bxc5 dxc5 I have a wide choice of ways of progressing: 24.e5, 24.Nd4, 24.Rge1, but best may be 24.Qd4 pinning the f-pawn. 23.Bxg5 I saw the mate here but was not sure if he had to go down the route he chose. 23...fxg5 [Genius opted for 23...Bf8, but White still has a winning advantage. -Ed.] 24.Nxe5 Qh3 He probably had to go 24...Qc7 which does tie my QN to c3. 25.Rh1 So his Q does not defend d7. 25...Qg2 26.Qf7+ Kd8 27.Rxd6+ Kc7 ...as 27...Bxd6 allows 28.Qd7 mate with the Q not defending the square. 28.Rd7+ And it is mate in three as the white Q comes back ro b3 to give the fatal check. 1-0



 









 

 


 

(18) I.D. Hunnable - M.J. Reddie [D30]
Three Bridges - ICC v Sussex U175, Boar, 2001

1.Nf3 Nf6 2.d4 d5 3.c4 e6 4.Bg5 c6 5.e3 5 Nbd2 is more accurate. 5...Qa5+ 6.Nbd2 Ne4 7.Bf4 Now Mick contemplated 7 ...g5 and if 8 Bxg5 dxc4 9 Bf4 b5 with complications. I had intended to sidestep these complexities with 8 Bxb8 Rxb8 9 a3. 7...Nd7 8.a3 Ndf6 9.h3 Qd8 10.Bd3 Bd6 11.Bxd6 Qxd6 12.0-0 0-0 13.Ne5 Nxd2 14.Qxd2 c5 15.Rfd1 b6 Black might be better off giving me an IQP with 15 ...cxd4 16 exd4 dxc4 17 Nxc4 Qd5 18 Ne3 Qd6 19 Qc2. 16.Rac1 Bb7 17.Qc3 Rfe8 18.dxc5 bxc5 19.cxd5 Nxd5 20.Qb3 If now 20 ...Rab8, I intended 21 Nc4 Qc6 22 Na5. Black decides to exchange my central knight for his long-range bishop. In any event, the central exchanges have left Black with a weak c-pawn. 20...Qxe5 21.Qxb7 Rab8 21 ...Reb8 is better. 22.Qxa7 Rxb2 23.Qxc5 Qf6 24.Rc2 g6 25.Rxb2 Qxb2 26.Rb1 Qd2 27.Qc2 Qa5 28.Rb3 Qe1+ 29.Kh2 Qa5 30.Qb2 Qc7+ 31.Kg1 Rc8 32.a4 Qc1+ 33.Qxc1 Rxc1+ 34.Kh2 Ra1 35.Bb5 Nb6 36.Bc6 Nd5 36 ...Nc4 makes it more difficult. 37.Bxd5 exd5 38.Rb8+ Kg7 39.Ra8 h5 40.Kg3 Ra2 The time control. A 20m QPF follows, the players carrying over 4 minutes and 1 minute respectively. 41.a5 d4 42.exd4 Ra4 43.d5 Rd4 44.Kf3 Rxd5 45.Ke3 Rd1 46.a6 Ra1 47.Kd4 Ra2 48.Kc5 Rxf2 49.Rd8 Rc2+ 50.Kb6 Rb2+ 51.Kc7 Rc2+ 52.Kb7 Rb2+ 53.Ka8 Rxg2 54.a7 Rg3 55.Kb7 Rb3+ 56.Kc6 1-0. 1-0



 









 

 


 

(19) OJN Cooley - IDH [C02]
Insurance v CU 1/12/2001, 01.12.2001

1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.e5 c5 4.c3 Nc6 5.Nf3 Qb6 6.Be2 cxd4 7.cxd4 Nge7 8.Na3 Nf5 9.Nc2 Be7 10.0-0 0-0 11.b4 Bd7 12.a3 Rac8 13.Bd3 Rc7 14.g4 Nh4 !? 15.Nxh4 Bxh4 16.g5 I must give up playing this line - I won't always get away with it! 16...Ne7 The first point is that 17 Qg4 Nf5 18 Bxf5 exf5 19 Qxh5 is met by 19 ...Rxc2. 17.Ne1 Bb5 18.Bxb5 Qxb5 19.Qg4 Nf5 20.Ng2 Qd3 21.Nxh4 Nxd4 Now Black's counterplay could be cut off by 11 Ra2 and if 11 ...Qb1 12 Rd2 Rxc1 13 Rxc1 Qxc1+ 14 Rd1 Qxa3 15 Qxd4 and White is winning. 22.Be3 Ne2+ 23.Kg2 Rc4 White overlooked this. 24.Qh3 d4 25.Rfd1 Better 25 Bc1 but after 25 ...Qe4+ 26 Qf3 Qxe5 27 Bd2 (27 Rfe1 Rxc1 28 Raxc1 Qxg5+ 29 Kh1 Nxc1) 27 ...d3 28 Kh3 h6 29 gxh6 g5 30 h7+ Kg7 Black is winning (analysis by Genius). 25...Qe4+ 26.Qf3 Now I had two plans to choose from, the game continuation, and 26 ...Qxh4 27 Qxe2 dxe3 28 Qxe3 when Black gains the advantage after 28 ...Re4! The game continuation looked promising too. 26...dxe3 27.Qxe4 Rxe4 28.Nf3 Nf4+ 29.Kg3 e2 30.Rd2 Rc8 31.Rc1 Ouch! Missed that. I have to waste a tempo. 31...Rf8 32.Re1 g6 Inaccurate, leaving my K-side pawns in a bind, but then I could not at this stage see how the nature of the position would change. 33.Rd4 Rxd4 34.Nxd4 Nd5 35.Rxe2 Rc8 36.Rc2 Rxc2 ...with the offer of a draw, swiftly declined due to my K-side. TC. QPF Clocks: W - 1hr 23m B - 1hr 18m. 37.Nxc2 Kf8 38.Kf3 Ke7 39.Ke4 Kd7 40.Ne3 Nc3+ Played straight away. For some unaccountable reason, I did not even consider exchanging knights! 40 ...Nxe3 41 Kxe3 would surely be a draw White cannot penetrate and must take steps to prevent Black from invading his Q-side. Instead, my knight has left its dominant position and must find a new purpose. 41.Kd3 Nb5 42.a4 Nc7 43.Kc4 Initially, I was concerned that White would go 43 Nc4 and invade at d6. 43 ...Ne8 would be an unacceptable come-down for the knight that so shortly ago stood proudly in the centre! Instead, I decided that 43 ...b5 would be an acceptable counter. 43...Kc6 44.b5+ Kb6 45.Kb4 a5+ 46.Kc4 Na8 The only way back! 47.Ng4 Strange. I had only seen the invasion at d6, but with this, White can choose between the incursion at f6 and at h6. He can, however, only have one of these pawns as the other would take him another four moves. 47...Kc7 48.Nh6 Nb6+ 49.Kb3 Nd7 50.Nxf7 Nc5+ 51.Kc4 If 51 Ka3 Nd3 52 f3 Ne1 53 f4 Nd3 54 Nd6 Nxf4 55 Kb3 Nd3 56 Nc4 b6 57 h4 Nc5+ 58 Ka3 with a draw. 51...Nxa4 52.Nd6 Nb6+ 53.Kd4 Nd7 54.Ne8+ Kb6 55.Nf6 Nf8 56.Kc4 a4 57.Kb4 a3 58.Kxa3 Kxb5 59.Kb3 Kc5 60.Kc3 b5 61.f4 b4+ 62.Kd3 b3 Decoying the king to clean off the other white pawns. However, had I realised the resource that White had on the K-side, I would have chosen 62 ...Kb5. This would have been a good choice from the clock perspective, where White had less than five minutes to my 20. But after nearly four hours play you don't think so clearly! 63.Kc3 b2 64.Kxb2 Kd4 65.h4 Ke3 66.h5 Kxf4 67.Nxh7 This is what I had missed, after which I am forced into a draw. 67...gxh5 68.Nxf8 Kxg5 68 ...Kxe5 leaves slightly more play, but does not change the result: 69 g6 Kf6 70 Kc3 e5 71 g7 Kxg7 72 Nxe5+ etc. 69.Nxe6+ Kf5 70.Ng7+ 1/2-1/2



 









 

 


 

(20) A.G.C. Paish - J.H. Aldred [B02]
ICC Club Championship, 22.01.2003

Notes in square brackets by the Webmaster with the aid of ChessGenius 5. 1.e4 d5 2.exd5 Nf6 3.Nc3 Nxd5 4.Bc4 Nb6 5.Bb3 Nc6 6.Qf3 Aimed at forcing Black's next, leading to subsequent problems for him in developing his QB. 6...e6 7.Nge2 Na5 8.d4 Nxb3 9.axb3 Be7 10.0-0 c6 11.Ne4 Nd5 12.c4 Nf6 13.Bf4 Nxe4 14.Qxe4 0-0 15.Rfd1 Bg5 16.Rd3 Bxf4 17.Nxf4 The opening has left White with a big space advantage and Black with a thoroughly passive position. 17...Qf6 18.Ra5 Now the benefit of gaining the half-open a-file in exchange for allowing Nxb3 becomes apparent. 18...g6 19.Rg3 Rd8 20.Re5 b6 At last, a chance to develop the QB! 21.Nh5 Qe7 22.Rf5 Qc7 Better 22...Qd6. 23.Rf6 I had originally intended 23 Nf6+, after which either 23 ,,, Kh8 or Kf8 leads to a fairly quick and obvious win for White, but after 23 ...Kg7, I could not find anything conclusive. [However, 23 Qh4! wins: 23...Qd6 24 Nf6+ Kf8 25 Nxh7+ Ke8 26 Nf6+ Kf8 27 Rxg6! Ba6 28 Rg8+ Ke7 29 Ne8+ Kd7 30 Rxf7+ Kc8 31 Nxd6+ Kb8 32 Rxd8+ Bc8 33 Rxc8#. - Analysis by ChessGenius 5.] 23...a5 24.Qe3 Qe7 25.h4 a4 26.b4 Ba6 At last Black can develop his bishop! 27.Rgf3 If now 26 ... gxh5, 27 Qg5+ and 28 Qxh5, winning quickly. 27...Ra7 28.Qe5 Qc7 29.Qg5 Getting rather short of time, and throwing caution to the winds. [Winning line was 29 Rxg6+! fxg6 30 Nf6+ Kf8 31 Nd5+ Kg8 (31...Qf7 32 Qh8#) 32 Nxc7 Bxc4 33 Qf6 Rb8 34 Nxe6 Bxe6 35 Qxe6 etc.] 29...Rxd4 Threatening mate in one. 30.g3 Qd6 I now had very little time left on my clock, but fortunately found the winning combination just in time. 31.Qh6 Qf8? [Black's last chance lay in the problematical continuation: 31...gxh5 32 Qg5+ Kf8 33 Qxh5 Qd7 34 Qxh7 Rg4 35 Qh8+ Rg8 36 Qh6+ Ke8 37Rxf7 Qxf7 38 Rxf7 Kxf7 39 Qh5+ Kf8 40 Qf3+ Ke7 41 Qxc6 Rb8 42 Qxa4 Rd8 43 f3 Rdd7 44 b5 Bc8 etc., when White's extra pawns and the exposed position of Black's king approximately compensate for Black's rooks and bishop.] 32.Rxg6+ Whichever way Black recaptures, it is mate next move. 1-0



 









 

 


 

(21) Farrand,J - Whiteley,A [C15]
Legal League v Insurance, 19.03.2003

1.d4 d5 2.Nc3 e6 3.e4 Bb4 [Whiteley is a well-known Winawer player so well-known lines had to be avoided.] 4.Bd3 dxe4 5.Bxe4 Nf6 6.Bf3 [ 6.Bg5!? ] 6...Nd5 7.Nge2 Nc6 8.0-0 Nxc3 9.bxc3 Be7 10.Rb1 0-0 11.c4 Bf6 12.Bb2 Qe7 13.Qd3 Rd8 [Threat Ne5.] 14.Be4 h6 15.f4 Meeting threat but...] 15...Nxd4 16.Bxd4 Bxd4+ [If 16 c5 Bxf6!] 17.Nxd4 c5 18.c3 cxd4 19.cxd4 Rb8 20.f5 [To activate rooks and save weak pawns.] 20...exf5 21.Bxf5 b6 22.Bh7+ [To keep my active bishop and weaken Black's f-pawn.] 22...Kh8 [ 22...Kf8 23.Rxf7+ Qxf7 24.Rf1+- ] 23.Rbe1 Qc7 24.Be4 Ba6 25.Rc1 g6?! 26.Qh3?! [Or 26 Qe3.] 26...Kg7 27.Bd5 f5 [ 27...Rd7 28.Qe3 Bb7 29.Bxb7 Rxb7 30.Rf4 f5 31.Rh4 g5 32.Rh3 ] 28.Qa3 [ 28.g4 f4 29.g5 hxg5 30.Qg4 Qe7 31.Rce1 Qf6= ] 28...Bc8 [ 28...Bb7 29.Qxa7+/- ( 29.Rfe1 Rd7 30.Re6+/- ) ] 29.Rfe1 Kf6 [ 29...Rd7 30.Re8 Qd6 31.Qxd6 Rxd6 32.Rce1 Rd7 33.R1e7+ Rxe7 34.Rxe7++- ] 30.Qh3 [ 30.Re5! ] 30...Qf4 [ 30...Kg7 31.Qh4 g5 32.Qh5 Rf8 33.Re5 Qd6 34.Rce1 Qf6 35.Re7+ Kh8 36.Rc7+- ] 31.Kh1 [ 31.Rcd1!? ] 31...Bd7 [ 31...Bb7 32.Qa3 Rd7 33.Be6 Re7 34.d5+/- ] 32.Rf1 [ 32.Qa3 Re8 33.Qxa7+/- ] 32...Qxd4 33.Rcd1 [ 33.Qxh6?? Rh8 ] 33...Qc5 [ 33...Qb2 34.Qh4+ Kg7 35.Qe7+ Kh8 36.Bf7 Qg7 37.Rd6+- ; 33...Qb2 34.Rde1 Re8 35.Qh4+ Kg7 36.Re7+ Rxe7 37.Qxe7++- ; 33...Qe5 34.Rde1 Qd4 35.Re4!+- ] 34.Qc3+ Kg5 [ 34...Ke7 35.Qe5+ mating] 35.h4+ Kxh4 36.Qf6+ g5 37.Qxh6+ [37...Kg3/4 Qh3 mate. Therefore Black resigns. 1-0



 









 

 


 

(22) Wismayer,C - Rich,M [B52]
Legal League v Insurance, 19.03.2003

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.Bb5+ The rarely-seen Moscow variation or Rossolimo attack. 3...Bd7 4.Bxd7+ [ 4.a4 Nc6 5.0-0 Nf6 6.Re1 e6 7.c3 a6 8.Bf1 Be7 9.d4 cxd4 10.cxd4 d5 11.e5 Ne4= Siaperas-Robatsch, Skopje Ol 1972.] 4...Qxd7 5.0-0 Nc6 [ 5...Nf6 6.e5 dxe5 7.Nxe5 Qc8 8.Qf3 e6 9.Nc3 Be7 10.d3+/= /= Hug-Savon, Petropolis 1973.] 6.b3 [ 6.c3 Nf6 7.d4 ( 7.Re1 e6 8.d4 cxd4 9.cxd4 d5 10.e5 Ne4 11.Nbd2 Nxd2= Segal-Ciocaltea, Dortmund 1980) 7...Nxe4 8.d5 Nb8 9.Re1 Nf6 10.Bg5 Na6 11.c4 e5!? 12.dxe6 fxe6 13.Nc3 Be7 14.Qc2 Nc7 15.Rad1 a6~~ Cording-Holm, Hamburg 1980.] 6...Nf6 7.Re1 g6 8.Bb2 Bg7 9.c4 0-0 10.Nc3 Nd4 11.d3 Nh5 12.Nxd4 Bxd4 13.Qd2 f5! An energetic thrust bringing Black's rooks into the game. 14.exf5 Rxf5 15.Ne4 [ 15.g4 Rxf2-+ ] 15...Bxb2 16.Qxb2 Nf4 17.Rad1 Raf8 18.d4 cxd4 19.Qxd4 Ra5 20.Rd2 Better 20 a4. 20...Qg4 21.Ng3 Rf7 22.f3 Qh4 23.b4? Once again, 23 a4, or better, 23 Qe3. 23...Rxa2! The Rd2 is overloaded so after 24 Rxa2? Nh3+ 25 gxh3 Qxd4. 24.Ra1? A second error follows the first, but after 24 Re4 Rxd2 25 Qxd2 Black retains an extra pawn and the advantage. 24...Nh3+ White must lose the exchange: 25 gxh3 Qxd4 26 Rxd4 Rxa1+ and has a lost position to boot. 0-1



 









 

 


 

(23) DR Sedgwick - DIW Reynolds [C68]
ICC Ch., 01.04.2003
[DIW Reynolds]

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Bxc6 dxc6 5.0-0 Bd6 6.d4 exd4 7.Qxd4 f6 8.Nc3 Ne7 9.Be3 Nc3 and Be3 do not seem to fit in with ultimately playing e5. 9...Be6 10.e5 fxe5 11.Nxe5 Nf5 12.Qe4 Qf6 13.Bf4 13 Nc4 seems better. 13...0-0 14.Rfe1 This takes a defender away from f2 but Rae1 leaves the KR at risk of ...Bc4 at some stage. 14...Rae8 15.Rad1 Bc5! Now Black is better. 16.Nf3 Nd6 17.Bxd6 cxd6 18.Qd3 d5 19.Ne2 Bg4 I now saw through to 3 Rb3 and a very strong ending but there did not seem to be any attacking route to an advantage. 20.Ned4 Bxd4 21.Qxd4 Qxd4 21...Rxe1 wins a pawn but almost certainly not the game! [ 21...Rxe1+ 22.Rxe1 Bxf3 23.Qxf6 Rxf6 24.gxf3 Rxf3 25.Re7 ] 22.Rxd4 Bxf3 23.Rxe8 Rxe8 24.gxf3 Re2 25.Rb4 b5 26.c3 a5 27.Rb3 a4 28.Rb4 a3 29.bxa3 Rxa2 30.Rb3 Kf7 31.f4 Kf6 32.Kg2 Kf5 33.Kf3 Rc2 34.Ke3 Ke6 35.Kf3 Kd6 36.h4 h5 37.Ke3 Kc5 38.f5 Kc4 39.f6 gxf6 40.Rb4+ Kxc3 41.Rf4 d4+ 42.Ke4 [ 42.Rxd4 Re2+ 43.Kxe2 Kxd4 is a simple win.] 42...Re2+ 43.Kf3 Re6 44.Rf5 d3 45.Rc5+ Kb2 0-1



 









 

 


 

(24) Toon,J - Sedgwick,D [C14]
Bronowski Trophy, 05.04.2004
[Ian Hunnable]

1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Bg5 Be7 5.e5 Nfd7 6.Bxe7 Qxe7 7.Qd2 0-0 8.f4 c5 9.Nf3 Nc6 10.0-0-0 f6 11.exf6 Qxf6 12.g3 a6 13.Bh3 Re8 14.f5? [ 14.dxc5 Nxc5 15.Qe3 Qe7 16.Rhe1+/- ] 14...cxd4 15.Nxd4? [ 15.Ne2 e5-+ ] 15...Nxd4 16.fxe6 [ 16.Qxd4 Qh6+ ] 16...Nxe6 17.Nxd5 Qd8 18.Rhf1 [ 18.Rhe1 Nf6 ] 18...Ndf8 [ 18...Ne5 19.Rde1 ( 19.Qc3 Qg5+ 20.Kb1 Nf8 21.Qb3 Kh8 22.Bg2 Bg4-+ ) 19...Nd4! 20.Bg2 ( 20.Qxd4 Bxh3-+ ) 20...Bh3! 21.Rd1 ( 21.Bxh3 Qxd5 22.c3 Nef3 23.Rxf3 Rxe1+ 24.Qxe1 Nxf3 25.Be6+ Kf8 26.Bxd5 Nxe1-+ ) 21...Bxg2 22.Qxg2 Nec6-+ ] 19.Kb1 [ 19.Qf2-/+ ] 19...Nc7 [ 19...Ng5 20.Bf5 Bxf5 21.Rxf5 Ne4 22.Qb4 Nd7 23.Rf4 Nec5-+ ] 20.Bg2 Nxd5 21.Bxd5+ Kh8 22.Qf2 Bg4 23.Qf7 Ng6 24.Bf3 Qg5 25.h4 Qh5 26.Rd7 [ 26.Rd5 Rf8 27.Qxf8+ Rxf8 28.Rxh5 Bxh5 29.Bg2-+ ] 26...Rg8 27.Rd5 Rgf8 28.Qc7 [ 28.Qxb7 Bxf3 ] 28...Qxd5 0-1



 









 

 


 

(25) Hunnable,I - Hamperl,F [B38]
Guernsey v Insurance, 09.11.2003
[Hunnable,I]

1.Nf3 Nf6 2.d4 c5 3.c4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 g6 5.Nc3 Bg7 6.e4 0-0 7.Be3 Nc6 8.Be2 b6 9.0-0 Bb7 10.f3 e6 11.Rc1 d5 Trying to bust the bind. Black is normally best advised to be patient in these positions; easy to say, less easy to do. 12.cxd5 exd5 13.Nxc6 Bxc6 14.e5 Ne8 15.f4 f6 Once more Black show impatience. The opening of the position can only advantage the better-developed side and the one with more space: White. 16.Bf3 Clearly, 16 exf6 Nxf6 lets Black back into the game. Instead, White plays for d5 which is a forking point between g8 and a8. 16...fxe5 [ 16...Nc7 ] 17.Nxd5 Bb5 [ 17...Rc8 18.Qb3 Kh8 19.Nxb6 axb6 20.Bxc6+/- ; 17...Bb7 18.Qb3 Kh8 19.Rcd1+/= ] 18.Qb3! Taking advantage of the attack on the Bb5 to introsduce a discovery into the equation. With so much black material coming under threat, the attack on the white KR is almost immaterial. 18...Bxf1 19.Nc7+ Kh8 20.Ne6 It was this fork that Black overlooked. With four pieces en prise, Black will surrender not one but two blobs. 20...Qd3 21.Bxa8 Still with two pieces en prise Black must lose material. 21...Rxf4 [ 21...exf4 22.Nxf8 Qxb3 23.axb3 Bb5 24.Nxg6+ hxg6 25.Bxf4+- ] 22.Bxf4 exf4 23.Rxf1 1-0



 









 

 


 

(26) Bowers,F - Hunnable,I [C11]
Civil Service v Insurance CC, 23.05.2004
[Hunnable,I]

1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd7 5.Nce2 c5 6.c3 Nc6 7.f4 Qb6 8.Nf3 cxd4 [ 8...f6 9.g3 cxd4 10.cxd4 Bb4+ 11.Bd2? fxe5 12.fxe5 0-0 13.Bg2 Ndxe5 14.dxe5 Nxe5 15.Ned4 ( 15.Bxb4 Qxb4+ 16.Kf2 Ng4+ 17.Kg1 Qxb2+/= ) 15...Nd3+ 16.Ke2 Nxb2 17.Qb3 Qa6+ 18.Kf2 Bxd2 19.Qxb2 Qd3 20.Rad1 Qe3+ 21.Kf1 b6 22.Qxd2 Ba6+ 23.Ne2 Rxf3+ 24.Bxf3 Qxf3+ 25.Kg1 Bxe2 26.Re1 Bd3 0-1 Hamman-Uhlmann Halle 1963] 9.cxd4 Bb4+ 10.Bd2 f6 11.Rc1 0-0 12.Bxb4 Qxb4+ 13.Qd2 Qb6 14.Ng3 fxe5 15.fxe5 [ 15.dxe5 ] 15...Rxf3 16.gxf3 Nxd4 17.Rc3 Nxe5 18.Be2 [ 18.Bg2 Nc4 19.Qc1 Nb5 20.Rd3 Bd7-+ ] 18...Bd7 19.Kf1 [ 19.f4 Nc4 20.Bxc4 dxc4 21.Qf2 Bc6 22.0-0 Rf8-+ ] 19...Rf8 20.Kg2 Bc6 21.Rf1 Ng6 22.Rf2 [ 22.Kh1 e5 23.Re3 Nf4 24.Rxe5 Nfxe2 25.Nxe2 Nxf3 26.Rxf3 Rxf3-+ ] 22...e5 [ 22...Nf4+ 23.Kf1 Ndxe2 24.Nxe2 Bb5-+ ] 23.Bd1 Nf4+ 24.Kh1 Nh3 25.Rf1 e4 [ 25...Qd8 26.Re1 Qf6 27.Nh5 Qg6-+ ] 26.a4 [ 26.fxe4 Rxf1+ 27.Nxf1 Nf3 28.Qe3 Qxe3 29.Nxe3 ( 29.Rxe3 Nf2+ 30.Kg2 Nxd1 31.Kxf3 Nxe3 32.Kxe3 dxe4-+ ) 29...d4 30.Rc1 Bxe4-/+ ] 26...Nxf3 27.Qc1? [ 27.Bxf3 exf3 28.a5 Qxa5 29.Qe3 Nf4-+ ] 27...d4? [ 27...Nf2+ 28.Rxf2 ( 28.Kg2 Nh4+ 29.Kg1 Nh3+ 30.Kh1 Rxf1+ 31.Nxf1 Qg1# ) 28...Qxf2 29.Bxf3 Rxf3 30.Rc2 Qb6-+ ] 28.Bb3+ Kh8 White was now down to his last minute on the clock. 29.Rxc6 bxc6 30.Be6 Nf4 31.Bf5 Nd3 [ 31...Ne2! ] 32.Qc4? [ 32.Qc2 Nde1 33.Qc1 ( 33.Qxe4 Qxb2 34.Qe2 Qxe2 35.Nxe2 Rxf5-+ ) 33...e3 34.Rxe1 Nxe1 35.Qxe1 Qxb2 36.Bd3 Rf2-+ ] 32...Qxb2 White now exceeded the time limit, but he has no defence anyway. 0-1



 









 

 


 

(27) Parrott,K - Skinner,B [D60]
Bronowski Trophy, 05.04.2004
[Kevin Parrott]

Every Dog Has His Day! I had rung Geoff Naldrett a few weeks before the match offering to be on standby. This was mainly to spare Geoff having to ring around anxiously on the day of the match and potentially having to default a bottom board. My intention was to attend regardless and stay for an hour or so - to say 'hello' to people and to watch some chess. When Geoff rang me on the day, I was secretly pleased to be participating but also concerned about being able to contribute in a match of such importance. I arrived at 40 Melton Street - and duly went through the security process, including being given a visitor's badge that had Reason For Visit as CHEST (sic). By coincidence, I travelled up in the lift to the 14th floor with Brian Skinner, who, it turned out, would be my opponent. I went through the usual procedures - locating where the toilets were, where the food and drink was, confirming the time control details and which end of the room would be housing the lower boards. I chatted with people I knew well, nodded at those I knew on nodding terms, and was studiously ignored by those who studiously ignore people. I felt a little strange as I have feet in both camps - I play for Asphalia in the Commercial League. The views from the room were excellent - you could see the Millennium Wheel, the 'gherkin' and many other London landmarks. You could also see the rain clouds forming in the distance. My first feeling when I saw the board order was one of relief at avoiding George Monk - he had politely kicked my head in the previous year. I noted that, as expected, ICC had the grading advantage on the top boards but we were outgraded at the lower end. After physically re-arranging the bottom 2 boards so that players could more easily move around during the evening, the match got underway. 1.d4