The Glory to be Revealed

By Robin Phillips, December 6, 2004

 

 

Saving Souls?

 

It is interesting that when many Christians think of salvation, they have in mind something to do with their soul or spirit living forever in the presence of God. Though they may also believe that they will be given a new body, this tends not to feature so much in the foreground of what it means to actually be “saved”. Hence, evangelists speak of “saving souls” but not “saving bodies.”

I would like to counter this trend by suggesting not merely that this account is radically incomplete, but that it is meaningless to speak merely of the salvation of a soul (whatever you may mean by the term) with no reference to the “the redemption of the body” (Rom. 8:23) which occurs at resurrection. This will become clear if we consider what is involved in salvation. Now it is plain from the Scriptures that salvation is essentially being rescued from sin and death. Therefore, before we are in a position to properly understand salvation, we must first consider what is involved in sin and death.

 

 

Death: A Disintegrating Influence

 

The way that sin and death affect things is by causing disintegration. Disintegration is the opposite of integration. Any system, whether it be a human being or a car, is healthy to the extent that there is integration among the constituent parts. When Adam and Eve sinned, separation occurred where there had previously been wholeness, health and integration. An almost endless list might be constructed of areas where this occurred: mankind became disintegrated from his Maker, from each other, from nature, from the animals, etc.

The disintegrating influence of sin in our world is not total, only partial. If it were total then there could be no possibility of life at all. Consider our own lives in this regard. We are continually subject to a tension between the force of physical disintegration and the force towards physical integration. At first the force of integration seems strongest. A baby enters the world and begins quickly to integrate: the various components of his body begin integrating with themselves as he learns to walk, respond, touch, talk and control his movements. As his mind grows he begins integrating with the outside world, with others and with nature. Yet, as life continues, as the person grows old, the process of disintegration sets in. Complete disintegration of body occurs only when the mind, soul and spirit become detached from it. Thus, we say that a person has died at precisely that moment when disintegration between body and spirit becomes total. Even before we die, however, the body and spirit are constantly in tension with each other. Death is merely the consummation of this tension.

It follows that if Christ has defeated death, this must necessarily involve the bringing back together of things that have been disconnected. Our salvation must involve the reintegrating of body, spirit and soul or we have not really been saved from death. As Paul put it, if there is not the hope of resurrection “Then also those who have fallen asleep in Christ have perished.” (1 Cor. 15:18) For this reason, it is meaningless to speak of the salvation of the soul independently of the salvation of the body, for any independence between these things is itself a result of sin and death. (The reason we have no trouble imagining the salvation of one and not the other is because all our experience has been colored by the hand of death, making it difficult to imagine wholeness as a deaf man finds it hard to imagine music.)

 

Heaven: A Waiting Room

 

If what I have said is correct, we should not think of going to heaven as the be all and end all of our salvation. Rather, heaven is a place where people wait for their resurrection.[i] That is why Revelation speaks of the dead in heaven waiting for the time when they will be vindicated on the earth (Rev. 6:9-11). To be sure, heaven is a lot more than merely a waiting room, but the point is that it is not until the new body is given to a person that their salvation is complete. That is why Paul can write that “now our salvation is nearer than when we first believed” (Rom. 13:11).

This truth was more generally understood by Christians of the past. It is instructive that on the tomb of William of Orange there is an inscription with the words “he awaits the resurrection”, not “he has gone to heaven.” This idea is consistent with the meaning of the Greek word for salvation which literally means “preserved.” Implicit in the idea of salvation is being preserved for resurrection. Thus, as soon as a person puts faith in Christ, they are ‘saved’ in the sense that if they were to die they would go straight to heaven to await their resurrection.

If this account is correct, then it follows that salvation is not the goal of the Christian life as many have made out; rather, it is the thing salvation preserves us for that should be the focus and hope of every Christian. Salvation is a matter of hope – hope for something we do not yet see.

 

Not only that, but we also who have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, eagerly waiting for the adoption, the redemption of our body. For we were saved in this hope, but hope that is seen is not hope; for why does one still hope for what he sees? (Rom. 8:23-24)

 

As the above passage shows, it is not all a matter of sitting back and waiting for resurrection. Paul taught that the Spirit has been given to us as the firstfruits of our salvation, a salvation to be consummated at the redemption of our body (Rom. 8:23 & 2 Cor. 5:5) but which still affects our present existence.

But what will it be like practically to have a glorified body. The accounts of Jesus after He was in his resurrection body seem to indicate that He was able to travel at the speed of thought. That being the case, we should also expect to be given such abilities when our lowly body is transformed to conform with His glorious body (Phil. 3:21; 1 John 3:2). We should expect not merely to be able to travel around the earth or the universe, but across the very dimensional boundary into heaven itself. Hence, the symbolism of ascending that I have explored in my essay on 1 Thessalonians 4:15-17. Heaven will be open and the angels will ascend and descend, as Jacob saw in his dream about the ladder. (Again, probably a picture of trans-dimensional travel.)

But this raises an important question: exactly what function will heaven play in the new earth? From the point of view of biblical focus it is certainly true that the earth is where God’s purposes are outworked. However, this shouldn’t lead us to reduce heaven to merely a kind of bus stop in our minds. It is a waiting room, to be sure, but not merely a waiting room. Remember, God promises to renew the heavens as well as the earth (Rev. 21:1). Since God’s kingdom exists in heaven as it will one day exist on the earth (Mat. 6:10), the heavenly region of God’s kingdom will require subjects and rulers just as much as God’s kingdom on the earth. No doubt some people will be called to populate and govern God’s kingdom in the heavenly dimension, while others do so in the lower dimension, while there is travel between the two dimensions.[ii]

It is now time to turn to Paul’s letters to the Corinthians to gain further insight into the resurrection body.

 

A Spiritual Body

 

One of Paul’s greatest expositions on the glories of resurrection occurs in his first letter to the Corinthian Christians, chapter fifteen.

 

There is one glory of the sun, another glory of the moon, and another glory of the stars; for one star differs from another star in glory. So also is the resurrection of the dead. The body is sown in corruption, it is raised in incorruption. It is sown in dishonor, it is raised in glory. It is sown in weakness, it is raised in power. It is sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body. There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body. And so it is written, “The first man Adam became a living being.” The last Adam became a life-giving spirit. However, the spiritual is not first, but the natural, and afterward the spiritual. The first man was of the earth, made of dust; the second Man is the Lord from heaven. As was the man of dust, so also are those who are made of dust; and as is the heavenly Man, so also are those who are heavenly. And as we have borne the image of the man of dust, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly Man.

           Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; nor does corruption inherit incorruption. Behold, I tell you a mystery: We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed – in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet. For the trumpet will sound, and the dead will be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed. For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality. So when this corruptible has put on incorruption, and this mortal has put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written: “Death is swallowed up in victory.”

 

“O Death, where is your sting?

O Hades, where is your victory?”

(1 Cor. 15:41-55)

 

There is a lot to unpack in this passage if we are to understand what Paul is saying. However, it is just as important to be clear on what Paul is not saying. At first it might be easy to think that Paul is saying that the resurrection body is non-physical, especially when he contrasts the “natural” body with the “spiritual” body. Some translations even render natural body as ‘physical body’ which seems to further reinforce the idea that the glorified body is non-physical. However, the Greek words that are translated “natural” and “spiritual” are psychikos and pneumatikos. Greek words ending in kos do not describe the substance out of which the thing is made but the force that animates the thing in question. Thus, the word psychikos, which is derived from the word psyche (life or soul), simply describes a physical body that is animated by the natural soul-life. This is contrasted with pneumatikos, which is physical body animated by the “spirit.” But both are physical bodies. A more accurate translation would be “spirit-powered body” vs. “natural-powered body.”

Even without recourse to the original Greek, the context makes it obvious that by ‘natural body’ (again, a bad translation) Paul is not referring to the physicality of the body. This follows from the fact that Paul clearly defines what he means by the ‘natural body’ by using a number of strong words: corruption, dishonor, weakness, mortality, death. Notice that the word ‘physical’ is not included in that list! The natural body Paul refers to is, of course, physical, but this is beside the point since the spiritual body is also physical.

The same point can be made in a different way. In verses 45-49 Paul explains that the ‘spiritual body’ is in the pattern of Christ (see also Phil. 3:21). Now we know that Jesus, after He was in His resurrection body, could eat and be touched. Just because He could travel at the speed of thought and therefore appear to go through walls does not mean that He was an immaterial ghost. In fact, Jesus specifically said He wasn’t a ghost and told Thomas to touch him.[iii]

Paul makes it clear that the spiritual body we will be given is not subject to corruption, death, etc. I pointed out earlier that physical death occurs when our spirit is separated from our material body. This separation between spirit and matter is why death is so devastating. Everyone feels the sting of death that Paul refers to - the sheer unnaturalness of it. When someone we love dies, even if objectively we are happy that they have gone to be with the Lord, there is something that strikes us deep. Like Thomas Browne, even if we are not afraid of death, we are certainly ashamed of it.[iv] Whether we are aware of it or not, the reason death stings us so acutely is because the separation between spirit and matter is fully actuated. Spiritually we become naked at death, to use Paul’s imagery from 2 Corinthians 5. We become naked because we cease to be clothed in flesh.

 

For we know that if our earthly house, this tent, is destroyed, we have a building from God, a house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens. For in this we groan, earnestly desiring to be clothed with our habitation which is from heaven, if indeed, having been clothed, we shall not be found naked. For we who are in this tent groan, being burdened, not because we want to be unclothed, but further clothed, that mortality may be swallowed up by life. (2 Cor. 5:1-4)

 

As this passage makes clear, we do not want to become fleshless, immaterial ghosts floating around eternity forever, as some have imagined. This tent of mortality is a burden to our spirits, not because we long to be unclothed in flesh, but because we long to be more fully clothed. To be fully clothed in our heavenly habitation - that is, our resurrection body - involves more than simply a long life without end, for when our body is fully fused with our spirit, then the physical experience we enjoy in our body will take on a quality that is inconceivable in our lower state. In the new body the spirit will no longer be in tension with material flesh. In a way that is presently inconceivable, resurrected flesh will be the very means by which our spirit will be liberated, as water liberates a fish or as air liberates the bird.

Our spirits, confined as they now are to our corruptible bodies, are currently held back and restricted. Flesh is not a prison for the spirit, but our present corruptible flesh Isa. That is why if we die and go to heaven our spirits will no doubt feel a certain degree of freedom even before we are clothed with our new body, as Paul implies in 2 Cor. 5:8. But that cannot be the end of the story, for like Job, we know that “though worms destroy this body, yet in my flesh shall I see God.” (Job 19:26; see also Isa. 26:19) Anything short of this dishonors the work of Christ, for as N. T. Wright put it,

 

If bodies are not raised, death has not been defeated, only redescribed. To say that we live on in a spiritual, non-bodily sphere is not to say that death has been defeated, only that death is not so bad after all.[v]

          

Imaging God Through Resurrection

 

Another reason why the doctrine of resurrection is so central to the Christian faith is because it is only through the medium of resurrected bodies that God’s original purpose for the world can be fulfilled. In my book The Gospel of the Kingdom, I have try to show that when God created mankind as His image, He intended for those images to mark out all creation for His glory. As images of God, each person was intended to reflect characteristics of the Lord Himself, as a mirror reflects a visual image. At the moment God’s people are like broken mirrors, still reflecting God but doing it imperfectly. The brokenness of our image reflects the sin wrought by the first Adam. “And as we have borne the image of the man of dust [Adam], we shall also bear the image of the heavenly Man.” (1 Cor. 15:49) Notice that Paul does not say we already bear the image of Jesus (though Paul did believe we are currently imperfect images), but that we shall. He is clearly referring to resurrection. Only through being resurrected can God’s images be restored and, therefore, can God’s purposes for the earth be fulfilled.

Without this overall vision, a grossly truncated view of salvation ensures. As Macaulay and Barrs write in Being Human, “the New Testament teaches explicitly that the purpose of salvation is to restore this image.”[vi] This process begins the moment we put faith in Jesus, but must await resurrection for culmination.

(As an aside, I strongly recommend Macaulay and Barrs’ book Being Human. The authors show how the doctrine of the image of God is the organizing principle for understanding the whole of the Christian life. Being Human is an excellent practical introduction to the Bible’s teaching on what it means to live as a human being in this world.)

 

The Weight of Glory

 

           The hope of future bodily resurrection is meant to be the keystone that inspires the Christian waLuke Paul even went so far as to suggest that without the hope of resurrection, the appropriate philosophy for life would be “Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we die!” (1 Cor. 15:29-34) For the early apostles, the harder the road became, the more they kept their eyes fixed on their unseen hope – the hope of an eternal weight of glory that would be consummated at the resurrection.

 

Therefore we do not lose heart. Even though our outward man is perishing, yet the inward man is being renewed day by day. For our light affliction, which is but for a moment, is working for us a far more exceeding and eternal weight of glory, while we do not look at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen. For the things which are seen are temporary, but the things which are not seen are eternal. (2 Cor. 4:16-18)

 

But as it is written:

 

“Eye has not seen, nor ear heard,

Nor has it entered into the heart of man

The things which God has prepared for those who love Him.”

(1 Cor. 2:9)

 

           This hope is not just a nice idea to take our minds off present difficulties – a kind of happy escapism. No indeed! The implications of our hope are above all practical. “And everyone who has this hope in Him purifies himself, just as He is pure” (1 John 3:3). The hope John is talking about is this hope of bodily resurrection:

 

Beloved, now we are children of God; and it has not yet been revealed what we shall be, but we know that when He is revealed, we shall be like Him, for we shall see Him as He is. (1 John 3:2)

 

We shall see Him as He is! The hope of perfect communion with Jesus after our resurrection is a hope that should permeate every moment of our lives right now.

 

Matter Matters

 

It is interesting that in the second century, certain Gnostic teachers tried to argue that Paul’s comments on resurrection should be understood as referring merely to a “spiritual” resurrection. Those who took this line also denied the physicality of Christ’s resurrection. Much literature in the early church, including the writings of Irenaeus, Tertullian, Justin Martyr, Ignatius of Antioch, Origen and many others, was written to combat such heresies and defend the doctrine of a future bodily resurrection. In his letter to Timothy, Paul had to counter the heresies of two people who were teaching that resurrection had already occurred (2 Tim. 2:17-18). They had probably spiritualized resurrection to mean something other than a future bodily resurrection.

In contrast to this, the biblical writings, particularly John’s first letter, emphasize that the physicality of Christ is central to Christianity. For this reason, we should revolt against any form of Christianity that de-emphasizes the importance of matter, even if it doesn’t actually deny the physicality of Jesus. Christianity is a very fleshy religion, with the rites of baptism, marriage and breaking of bread at the heart, a testimony that God Himself took on flesh. And it will not be until we actually see Jesus face to face in the flesh, that our joy will be complete.

 

Return to Robin Phillips HOMEPAGE

 

 

You are invited to join my mailing list!

 

As a member of my mailing list, you will receive automatic notification about additional material and features on this site, as well as occasional newsletters. To join, send a blank email to

 

largerhope  @  tiscali.co.uk

 

with “Join” in the subject heading. To unjoin, send a blank email with “Unjoin” in the subject heading.

 

(Note: for anti-spam purposes, the above email address has had spaced inserted before and after the @ sign. The address will only work after deleting these spaces.)

 



[i]  There are two senses of the term resurrection. One is when a dead person is brought back to life, as when Lazarus was ‘resurrected’ by Jesus. The other sense of resurrection refers to a state of existence in which the death-principle is no longer operative. In the New Testament there are two words for resurrection. The first is anistemi in its verb form or anastasis in its noun form. The later is a compound of ana (up, or again) and histemi (to stand). Hence the idea of standing up again is central to the notion of resurrection. The second word that is translated resurrection in the New Testament is egeiro in its verb form and egersis in its noun form. The verb literally means “to arise”. The noun form egersis is not used as such, but the verbal form also attracts the prefix sun. sunegeiro means “To stand up together” with someone, and is found in Ephesians 2:6; Col.2:12. In both cases, the idea is of being in a supine or sitting position, and then to stand up, or to arise.

 

[ii]          For various reasons that would be too complex to present here, I suspect that the flow of time in the heavenly dimension does not run parallel to our own time-line. If this is the case, then it is conceivable that a resurrected person on earth could enter heaven and return to find no time or very little time had passed. But that is another whole subject.

I have only mentioned two dimensions: earth and heaven. But actually, my research has seemed to indicate that heaven consists of two different dimensions, making a total of three dimensions when the earth is included. In Genesis 1:1 when it says “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth”, the Hebrew word for “heaven” is plural. It is a special kind of plural that was possible in the Hebrew language (known as the dual number) which indicates just two of a thing. It indicates that in the beginning God created two heavenly dimensions. This would be consistent with the three references in Revelation to “mesouranēma” which should literally be translated ‘middle heaven’ (Rev. 8:13; 14:6; 19:17). The lower of the two heavenly dimensions is ‘middle’ in so far as it is between the earth dimension and the top heavenly dimension. As the lowest heavenly dimension is greater than the earth, so the highest heavenly dimension must be that much greater than the lower heavenly dimension. I personally think (again for reasons that would be too detailed to reproduce here!) that it is in the middle dimension that warfare occurs between the Lord’s angels and Satan’s angels, while no evil is allowed to enter the highest heaven. If this understanding is correct, then the “new heavens” spoken about in Revelation must refer to the renewing of this middle dimension when Satan and his angels are finally imprisoned.

If this model is correct, then meeting the Lord in the air could be symbolic of the Lord descending from the top heaven into the middle dimension to meet those who had been raised from the earth. Since heaven is not a place located in our universe but another dimension of existence, then it is hard to speak of travelling to heaven except with the kind of metaphoric language Paul employs in his letter to the Thessalonians.

 

[iii]    Commenting on this passage, Wright says that “What Paul is asking us to imagine, stretching his readers’ minds no doubt as much as ours, is that there will be a new mode of physicality which is to our present body as our present body is to a ghost. It will be as much stronger, more real, more firmed up, more bodily, than our present body as our present body is more substantial, more touchable, than a disembodied spirit. We sometimes speak of someone who’s been very ill as being now ‘a shadow of their former self.’ If Paul is right, you as a Christian today are a mere shadow of our future self… (‘Three Score Years – and Then? Exploring the Easter Hope’ Westminster Abbey Lectures 2001 by the Canon Theologian, Dr. N. T. Wright, Lecture 7, ‘The Weight of Glory: The Hope of Bodily Resurrection’, September 24.) See also Wright’s The Resurrection of the Son of God (Augsburg Fortress Publishers, 2003).

 

[iv]    Thomas Browne, Religio Medici, Part 1, Section 40.

 

[v]    Wright, (‘Three Score Years – and Then? Exploring the Easter Hope’, op. cit.

 

[vi]    Ranald Macaulay & Jerram Barrs, Being Human: the nature of spiritual experience (Inter-Varsity, 1978), p. 5.