
Memorandum: 24th September 2001
by Caroline Coon
see also THE POLITICAL HERB in eTV
Does
Existing Drugs Policy Work. What Would be the Effect of Decriminalisation, Is
Decriminalisation Desirable?
(Points to be made in keynote speech at Trafalgar Square Rally after the
March from Speakers Corner, September 29th 2001 (estimated attendance 10,000))
1
. We have won the argument about our personal use of cannabis. The police agree
with us. We are witnessing the end of prosecutions for cannabis personal use.
2. The biggest problem for us cannabis users is how we buy our drugs and who we buy our drugs from, our DRUG DEALERS.
3.
Home Secretary David Blunkett, in line with the incoherent Police Foundation's
Report Drugs and the Law, is proposing even longer prison sentences for drug
dealers. Blunkett is proposing that drug dealers should be sent to prison for
longer even than murderers, or people in possession of guns or people who sexually
abuse children. This is an expensive mistake. Prison doesn't work for drug dealers.
4. We should care what the law does to drug dealers not only in an abstract way for the sake of ethics or morality, but PRACTICALLY for our own safety's sakes. Demonizing drug dealers puts us all in danger. Putting drug dealers outside the law means that every time we buy our drugs we risk getting poisoned, ripped off, mugged or worse.
5.
I trust my own dealer. She tries to supply organic weed, and she gives me a
fair deal. But 1 am always concerned at the risk she has to take - in effect
for my sake. If she gets busted she will be sent to prison for years. If I get
busted... well, not much will happen.
6. Should I be busted, like many of us here to-day, I will ensure it costs Government a great deal of time and money. I will refuse to be cautioned, I will plead not guilty, and cite the Human Rights Act.
7.
Since it is not against the law for us to kill ourselves, since we are free
legally to commit suicide, then Tony Blair and George W Bush have no right to
tell us what recreational drugs we take however bad they think they are for
our health - because, as we all know, with educated care, all drugs can be taken
safely.
8. What we must do from now on. is insist that the way we buy are drugs is safe. This means that we must, stop demonizing growers and dealers. We must licence growers and dealers to supply us with drugs of our choice.
9.
Licensing the cannabis trade, from prime producers to user, is not a complicated
matter. We do not need to re-invent the wheel in the matter of manufacturing,
licensing and controlling the sale of drugs whether cannabis or anything else.
We already have well tested laws for manufacturing and selling drugs like alcohol,
tobacco, aspirin and Viagra.
10. For example, for our own use we are free to brew alcohol. For our own use we must be free to grow cannabis.
11.
For example, we can buy alcohol on licensed and off licensed primacies. Likewise
we must be free to buy cannabis from off licences or supermarkets, or from our
local grocery store or our local cannabis cafe. We must be free to buy our cannabis
from specialist shops like Tony's Hemp Corner, and Lees Alchemy, from Colin's
Dutch Experience in Stockport or Cafe Cairo in Clapham, or from Tesco's or Harrods.
12. Like we have a variety of ways of buying tobacco from cigarettes to cigars and alcohol from beer, wine, spirits or champagne there be will be that many varieties and ways of packaging cannabis, from cheap everyday pot-ordinary to expensive special-occasion pot-vintage. We must be free to smoke cannabis not only in private, but in public, in cafes and pubs or where ever it is possible to smoke tobacco.
14.
OTHER DRUGS? Yes, the same applies for all other recreation drugs from Ecstasy,
speed and LSD.
15. Because HEROIN can be an unpleasant, highly addictive drug sometimes involving blood and needles, heroin must be available on prescription from a G.P.
16.
COCAINE can be just as dangerous as whisky or vodka. Cocaine could be available
in the same way and in the same places as whisky and vodka
17. Legal manufactures of cannabis and other drugs, will be subject to health and safety regulations.
18.
If we are producing and buying drugs and not producing and making our own, we
will be have to pay tax. Instead of threatening to confiscate the assets of
drug dealers, David Blunkett should instruct his civil servants in the Home
Office to tax the earnings of the cannabis trade. And yes, as with alcohol and
tobacco, when Gordon Brown excessively taxes cannabis, the police will have
their time cut out trying to catch tax-avoiding smugglers.
19. This is the shape of the drug scene to come:
Prohibition will end bringing drugs, drug takers, drug producers, manufactures
and sellers, dealers and traders with in the law. This will make society safer
whether you take drugs or not.
20. Ending the futile demonization of drug growers, manufacturers, suppliers, traders and dealers will end a massive amount of violent crime. To legalise the growing and supplying of cannabis will take this popular drug out of the hands of the Mafia and terrorists like the IRA and Osama Bin Laden.
21.
Legalising the growing and marketing of cannabis whether in cooperatives, fair
trader associations or in big business will give a decent living to cannabis
growers, especially farmers in countries where cannabis is a traditional crop
e.g. Afghanistan, Morocco, Egypt, India, Nigeria, Pakistan, Jamaica...
22.
The money saved in ending this war on the prime producers of cannabis - our
drug dealers - will be especially useful in this respect: we w i 11 be able
to spend money on educating people about the dangers of drug use. We will have
enough money to spend on the care and treatment of those who become dependent
on drugs.
We must remember that at least 5% of any population is vulnerable to drug dependency.
And you never know who that vulnerable person is. It could be me, it could be
you. All of us must be careful.
The scandal is that apparently politicians don't care.
The effect of decriminalisation would
a) not lead to any significant increase the availability and demand for drugs
b) increase the money spent on education so that, as with alcohol and tobacco,
there could be a reduction in drug-related deaths and an increase in social
control to encourage responsible use of recreational drugs e.g. campaigns against
drink/drug taking and driving.
c) not effect the aeneral level of crime. Although violent crime will be reduced
in the drug trade, the legal drug trade and legal drug use will still have to
be policed.
Decriminalisation
is desirable because
23.
thousands of drug users will be taken out of the criminal system with commensurate
saving in police and court costs and time.
24. The War on Drugs brings politics and democracy into disrepute. The phoney War on,.,Prugs is a prime reason why there is an increasing detrimental gulf between Government and the street. To many people it appears that George Bush 2 and Tony Blair's War on Drugs has nothing to do with taking care of sick and vulnerable people in society. Bush and Blair have taken recreation drugs themselves. And survived. Why should people vote for such palpable hypocrites?
George
Bush 2 and Tony Blair's rich and famous financial supporters, advisers and friends
have taken recreation drugs. Do they think we don't know? jbgy don't go to prison,
and neither do their drug dealers.
The
truth is that it is obvious to many people that the rich and privileged don't
care about the rest of us. All these "great and good" "respectable"
people, including Sun newspaper editors and BBC TV executives, they shut up
in public about the need to end the phoney War on Drugs for the sake of huge
salaries, quango jobs and promotion to the House of Lords.
While many people, especially the poor and the young, die for want of education and care in this phoney War on Drugs, in private the cowardly "great and good" nod and wink. Behind closed doors the great and the good express anxious doubts about prohibition.
While
we cannot heap enough praise on brave backbenchers like Paul Flynn, Jon Owen
Jones and Anne Cryer, there is nothing cuddly or cute about duplicitous politicians
like Mo Molem. She enjoyed the odd puff of cannabis. Yet, until she was about
to retire she preached Government's unjust War On Drugs. Her kind of political
hypocrisy has nothing to do with principal or fact or a safer society and everything
to do with cowardly selfinterest and venal ambition.
24. Can we do more about all this than we are already?
Yes,
we can keep up the pressure.. Until politicians and "the great and the
good" come out and demand that the rest of us, like them, should be free
to buy our druas from safe licensed growers and safe licensed dealers then WE
WILL JUST HAVE TO CALL THEM HYPOCRITES, RIDICULE THEM AND DEMONSTRATE. TAKE
TO THE STREETS. KEEP UP THE PRESSURE. Demand International Justice. Demand the
total end to prohibition!
To:
The Second Clerk of the Committee at the House of Commons, 7 Millbank, London,
SW1 P 3JA
From: Caroline Coon, artist, co-founder of Release and an activist for the end
of Prohibition.
New
Comment May
2005 >>>
More about
Caroline Coon >>>
See also: Rosie Boycott >>>
See also:
Don Aitken >>>