 Click For First Page Of This Chapter
At first, the Fusion - Infusion idea seemed preposterous. I had no way to prove the theory accurate, or even offer it credibility. Then, quite by chance,
the Hubble telescope came up with a piece of unexpected evidence. I already knew if the universe had moved one way during its consolidation period, it must naturally move back the other way as it unwound, although I believed any opportunity to prove the theory remote to say the least. Then I saw the very exciting results from Hubble's deepfield experiment, where the telescope observed the deepest, darkest recesses of the universe. To my surprise, they showed us perfectly formed galaxies. I couldn't believe my luck. By a freak accident, NASA had unintensionally provided me with not only a credible answer to my theory and lack of prediction, but at the same time they would also simultaneously contridict Elnsteinian physics. If the telescope hadn't been situated so far from the Earth, I would have quite honestly given it a big kiss!
According to Einsteinian physics, we may only ever look longingly back down, what he termed, a tunnel of time. It other words, we could only ever see galaxies
compose themselves. But
the very advanced, very accurate, very expensive Nasa Hubble telescope contradicted Einstein in the most pornographic way,
stood logic on its head and demonstrated unequivocally, not only can you look back at the earilest kindling of life, as embryonic galaxies compose themselves, but you can also look forwards at the prospect of what is to
come. These were the money shots. Hubble had shown us our future in all of its naked glory. The Hubble, space based telescope showed perfectly formed, completed galaxies. Amazing. But more importantly for me the telescope readings obliterated any chance of a Big Bang singularity. Although science,
for a reason known only to themselves, still refuses to accept this. They still argue, quite passionately and very defensively, that there must be an
alternative explanation, even though any explanation remains as remote, and as distant as their search for all of the illusive, universal missing mass.
Now convinced of the merits of the arguement, and the outstanding piece of postulation I had built, I was determied to go further, to push at the
boundaries of reason and take charge of a new debate. After all, if I can't have faith in my ideas, how can anyone else? It became somewhat of an addiction over the next year or two, and a bit of a preoccupation with me to build in a measurable prediction. I wanted to give science something to go forth and measure, not just expect them to take my word for it. It was then it hit me. If
the hypothesis was accurate, there should be a huge array of pulsars located central to the universe. At the distant centre of our universe, we should see an entire stella nursery full of pulsar activity. Out there somewhere, hidden many billions of light years away, will be a bank of pulsars, flashing, radiating a steady rythmic beat. Indeed, there will be a pumping, pulsating heart to the universe where everything around us is governed from. No doubt this is the remnant science mistakenly believes to be left over from a Big Bang singularity.
My prediction is this. If we scour the heavens, then eventually we'll discover not only the largest array of pulsars imaginable, but a steady rythemic beat. A rythmic beat which might already be constrewed, as just mentioned, for a Big Bang singularity. All we need is a touch of faith, a bejief in our own ability to push the boundaries of reason to the very periphery of mankind's inquisitive nature, and explore the possibility any new theory might hold. The
opportunities for our advancement of comprehension, are not only out there patiently waiting beyond the tapestry of creation we cheerish so much, but lurk within the confines of our own mind. Only our lack of understanding, and worthless ability to believe in ourselves holds back humanity from the greatest quest of all: the explanation of our contribution to the most magnificent event ever witnessed: The birth of creation.
With the theory complete, I knew I had more on my hands than I could ever wish for. Not only could I now determine a simple, and it is simple, evaluation of creation, but I could also date the composure and decomposure of the universe. Science stipulates with one percent mass detectable in the cosmos, our universe is approximately 15 billion years old. If we take them at their word, and I see no reason why we shouldn't, then we have to say a consolidation of universal material should be measured as fifty percent, not one hundred percent mass, as some might speculate. We only measure
halfway, becuse the second half is calculated on its return. Therefore, with this in mind, by my estimation our universe has c.ompleted half of its journey and is now moving back. This gives us a universal reading of not 15 billion years as science says, but 765 billion years, leaving about 735 billion years to run. If I'm right, the completion of the universe should take from start to finish
somewhere in the region of 1.5 trillion years. At that point the universe will burn itself out, cease to exist, solidify and return to a diamond, carbon based compound free of the laws of physics, where it will patiently waits to prepare itself for another lifecycle. And the whole endeavour will begin all over again.
First Page
Big Bang 1 Big Bang 2 Big Bang 3 Big Bang 4 Big Bang 5
Big Bang 6 Big Bang 7 Big Bang 8 Big Bang 9 Big Bang 10
Big Bang 11 Big Bang 12 Big Bang 13 Big Bang 14 Big Bang 15
Big Bang 16 Big Bang 17 Big Bang 18 Big Bang 19 Big Bang 20
Big Bang 21 Big Bang 22 Big Bang 23 Big Bang 24
Big Bang Essay Page 1 Big Bang Essay Page 1
Big Bang Essay Page 2
Big Bang Essay Page 3
Big Bang Essay Page 4
Big Bang Essay Page 5
Big Bang Essay Page 6
Big Bang Essay Page 7
Big Bang Essay.
|
|
|
