HOME__________________________________________________________________________________________________
I will not catalogue all the activities to promote the continued existence of
wildlife in general, and lepidoptera in particular, that have taken place in my
local authority during this new millennium. Suffice it to say there are a lot,
many of which have been referred to in previous newsletters. However, it might
be useful to highlight to whom approaches were made since this should give you
ideas how to instigate a similar campaign in your local authority area.
The successful campaigns to protect Hawne Colliery and question the need for the
proposed Dudley bypass extension started by contacting the Planning Department.
In both cases the final judgement went to adjudication by an Independent
Government Inspector since the Unitary Development Plan, a ten year planning
policy document, was in the final throes of endorsement. Both the proposed
schemes would impact on its structure, hence the involvement of the Inspector,
but I now understand this is not the norm.
Do not for one moment think that just objecting is the only route to success.
When a leading councillor said to me ‘You wildlife people always tell us what we
can’t do’ I realised we would never win the war if that is people’s reaction to
our aims. Since then I have been an advocate of partnership.
Initiatives to improve current habitat, such as the council’s parks and open
spaces, started by local councillors approaching me, sometimes after they had
received representations from local interest groups. A good example is the
flagship borough park, namely Mary Stevens in Stourbridge. The ‘Friends of Mary
Stevens’ Group were initially motivated by growing levels of vandalism and not
biodiversity. However, what is better than a thorny hedge to keep out miscreants
along with a wildlife hedge margin that local schools can monitor as part of the
Community Plan and Lifelong Learning initiatives.
Finally, do not forget a council’s ‘amenity department’, the one responsible for
dustbins, litter, grass cutting, spraying etc. In Dudley it is called
Engineering for some strange reason that is lost on me. It became increasingly
apparent that they had an equal, if not greater, impact on biodiversity than the
Countryside Services Department, the latter being responsible for nature
reserves and nature friendly areas. Engineering has always been difficult to
influence. I now know why. How would you react if you get about a hundred
complaints a day from ratepayers and councillors without adequate funds to
address issues in an appropriate manner? We therefore approached them officially
through the council’s LA21 Committee, where I am a member. In a formal meeting
we agreed to a ‘step-by-step’ approach to improve current practices in a cost
neutral manner but also get favourable publicity. We nearly had our hands bitten
off by their enthusiasm.
All this has not been a ‘one-man-band’ and I would like to thank the following
for their contributions –
Local Branch Members who have both recorded butterflies and sent in their
records to inform the Council and those that wrote to object to the proposed
developments at Hawne Colliery and the Bypass Extension - Mrs Armstrong, Celia
Barton, Eric Bird, Mark Chester, Colin Hale, Steve & Carol Harper, Keith Harris,
Tony Marsh, Brian Marsh, Joy Stevens, Jim Whitehouse, Nick Williams and Richard
Woolley. I special thanks to Dave White for his transect data at Hawne which was
so influential during the appeal process.
Local Agenda 21 Organisations who have either been pressure groups, other
wildlife organisations or educational bodies – Stourbridge College, Nick
Williams – British Trust Conservation Volunteers, Richard Billingsley & Alison
Wilkes - Soroptomists, Iris Berrow - Halesowen Wildlife Group, Colin & Hazel
Gurney – British Waterways, Paul Wilkinson – Friends of Bumble Hole, Mike Parks
- Urban Wildlife Trust, Chris Parry & Paul Stephenson.
Local Council Officials - Planning Department, Ali Glaisher & John Mainwaring -
Countryside Services, Kevin Clements, Jonathon Preston, Antony Ravenscroft &
Anna Gorski - Engineering, Russell Newey – Community Plan Officer, Alex Webb.
Other organisations and Individuals – EcoRecord, Sara Carvalho – Birmingham
University, Dr Andrew Pullin & Alison Loram, the latter who is about to publish
her doctorate on ‘Butterfly species in urban grasslands’ – Pensnett Wildlife
Group, Brian Marsh & Celia Barton – Halesowen Township Council, I have learned a
huge amount about planning regulations and technical details from Mike & Carol
Freer, a special thanks – WM Police, Dave Friday who has championed the cause of
biodiversity, kept me informed and put up with my constant queries on moth
identification – Dave Grundy for getting a number of moths into the area’s
Biodiversity Action Plan, more on this in the future I predict - Non Ratepayer
Branch Members, John Wills, Alan Prior & Val Weston, and all those who wrote to
object to the planning consent at Anchor Meadow that prompted all this local
activity – The Media, including BBC Midlands Today, the Birmingham Post and the
Express & Star – Commerce, Chelsfield PLC (Merry Hill) & LCP Properties (Pensnett
Trading Estate) - and last but not least , all the Local Councillors from all
political persuasions who took more than a passing interest.
My apologies in advance for anyone I have missed either due to my memory or
those that did something anonymously. Has wildlife benefited? Yes it has. The
improving habitat infrastructure in the borough is flagging up more colonies of
Dingy Skipper and Green Hairstreak who are finding new locations in which to
breed suggesting Dudley is reversing the national trend.
And the future? Wildlife will go on in Dudley with so many ‘safe pairs of hands’
taking an active interest but my hope is the newsletter will receive articles of
others experiences in your metropolitan boroughs and rural districts throughout
the branch territory. It’s already happening in Stoke but what about ………?
Richard Southwell