Flight 77 Hijacker 

Hani Hanjour:
9/11 Pilot Extraordinaire

From the ridiculous to the sublime...

At least six of the supposed hijackers accused by FBI are still alive. Another supposedly died in 1999.

Latest pictures released purportedly showing  Nawaf al-Hazmi (left) and his brother, Salem checking in at Dulles airport ready to board American Airlines flight 77. The problem is that Salem Al-Hamzi, 26 (in 2001) has been interviewed by various newspapers, and is most certainly alive and well, and still works at a petrochemical company in Yanbou Eastern Saudi Arabia. He said: 

"I have never been to the United States and have not been out of Saudi Arabia in the past two years." 

The FBI described him as 21 and said that his possible residences were Fort Lee or Wayne, both in New Jersey. He had just returned from holiday on September 11th 2001. It has been reported that Nawaf is also still alive. 

Since when do we have airport security videos without time and date information? The above image could be any time, any date, any flight, anywhere, any person. The white unit is a bomb detection unit, these where not in place at Dulles on September 11th 2001.

 We've seen airport security videos before. Remember the picture of Mohammad Atta at Portland boarding the flight to Boston? You would wonder why the FBI found Atta's car parked at Boston then wouldn't you?

There are no Arabic names on any of the lists of passengers from either of the four planes involved.

This includes a list released by a forensic lab that identified all but one passenger on Flight 77.

That is the plane that supposedly made the hole in the side of the Pentagon pictured above. So we have no evidence of a plane because it supposedly melted and yet we have a full forensic identification of all the passengers that were supposedly on board.

Revealed: The men with stolen identities

CLICK ON THIS AND READ ABOUT OPERATION NORTHWOODS

President Kennedy knocked it on the head so they knocked him on the head

Read the actual documents here

"The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists."

-- J. Edgar Hoover

******

“I was not involved in the September 11 attacks in the United States nor did I have knowledge of the attacks. There exists a government within a government within the United States. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; to the people who want to make the present century a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity. That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks … The American system is totally in control of the Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States.”

"Many of the investigators [FBI] believe that some of the initial clues that were uncovered about the terrorists' identities and preparations, such as flight manuals, were meant to be found. A former high-level intelligence official told me, "Whatever trail was left was left deliberately--for the F.B.I. to chase."

A bit of History

In February 1898 an explosion aboard the US battleship Maine in Havana 
harbour killed 266 U.S. sailors. Although the exact cause of the explosion 
was never determined it sparked the Spanish-American War with Cuba.

Incited by the outrage, more than one million men volunteered for duty. 
Sound familiar?

You could of course do a bit of research on something called 

'The Gulf of 
Tonkin Incident'.

 The most interesting thing about this affair is not so much the actions of the USS Maddox but the silence of the press in telling the American people what was blatantly obvious what had really happened.

The New York Times said that the president [Johnson], 

"went to the American people last night with the sombre facts." 

The Los Angeles Times urged Americans to: 

"face the fact that the Communists, by their attack on American vessels in international waters, have themselves escalated the hostilities."

It is now *known* that these top papers, still in circulation, knew the 
real facts that the US had staged the whole incident and lied to the world. As a direct consequence of this single incident 50000+ US personnel were killed and goodness knows how many more crippled for life. Not to mention the suffering of the North Vietnamese and the people of Laos and Cambodia.

Then there's the facts surrounding the attack on the USS Liberty.

Then there's Pearl Harbour : - 

Read Day of Deceit: The Truth about FDR and Pearl Harbor by Robert B. Stinnet. 

From November 17th to 25th 1941. The US Navy had intercepted no less than 83 messages sent by the Japanese High Command to the Carriers that carried out the attack on Pearl Harbour. Including the message 'higashi no kaze ame' (east wind rain) The Japanese code for war.

The US wanted an excuse for war and deliberately allowed the attack to take place. By the trade embargos imposed on the Japanese, Roosevelt had given them no choice but to retaliate.

BERLIN TV TIES CIA & MOSSAD TO BERLIN TERROR ATTACK

This gave Reagan an excuse to attack Libya

You see they've been doing it for years.

If they get away with it once they'll try it again and again.

It seems they did get away with it on S

"AT ANY GIVEN MOMENT, THERE IS A SORT OF ALL PERVADING ORTHODOXY,
A GENERAL TACIT AGREEMENT NOT TO DISCUSS LARGE AND UNCOMFORTABLE FACTS."

- George Orwell

Meet the Loizeaux Family of Controlled Demolition Inc.

The Company who removed the rubble/evidence from Ground zero and the Oklahoma bombing.

Here's the statement:

"I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it. And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse."
[This can be heard in the audio file http://sirdave.com/mp3/PullIt.mp3

If they deliberately demolished WTC 7 late afternoon on Tuesday September 11th then the demolition charges would have to have been in place prior to the attacks.

In a document called "Project for a New American Century",  Systems Planning Corporation International executive, Dov Zakheim, called for a 'Pearl Harbor' type of incident being necessary to foster the frame of mind needed for the American public to support a war in the Middle East that would politically and culturally reshape the region.

Speaking for the families of the victims, she poses the following questions to President Bush:

We have yet to hear any answers to these questions

Perhaps you ought to ask, irrespective of whether this case is right or wrong, why there appears to be very little mention of this on any news media. One would have thought that the President being sued by victims relatives of the September 11th attacks and these relatives refusing to take payment, would be at least slightly newsworthy.

911 Commission members

The Rabbit Warren Commission.

One of the biggest collection of common crooks, sycophants and oil barons ever assembled.

Open Letter To Thomas Kean – Chairman Of The 9/11 Commission - From FBI Whistleblower Sibel Edmonds

A must read

She was told by her superiors to slow down investigations and in some cases stop investigations altogether.

As Reagan's special envoy in 1983, Rumsfeld hand-delivered a letter from the president to Saddam, telling the Iraqi "that the United States and Iraq shared interests in preventing Iranian expansion."

Oh what a tangled web they weave when first they practice to deceive 

Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction.-Dick Cheney
Speech to VFW National Convention
August 26, 2002

Right now, Iraq is expanding and improving facilities that were used for the production of biological weapons.-George W. Bush
Speech to UN General Assembly
September 12, 2002

If he declares he has none, then we will know that Saddam Hussein is once again misleading the world.-Ari Fleischer
Press Briefing
December 2, 2002

We know for a fact that there are weapons there.-Ari Fleischer
Press Briefing
January 9, 2003

Our intelligence officials estimate that Saddam Hussein had the materials to produce as much as 500 tons of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent.-George W. Bush
State of the Union Address
January 28, 2003

We know that Saddam Hussein is determined to keep his weapons of mass destruction, is determined to make more.-Colin Powell
Remarks to UN Security Council
February 5, 2003

We have sources that tell us that Saddam Hussein recently authorized Iraqi field commanders to use chemical weapons -- the very weapons the dictator tells us he does not have.-George W. Bush
Radio Address
February 8, 2003

If Iraq had disarmed itself, gotten rid of its weapons of mass destruction over the past 12 years, or over the last several months since (UN Resolution) 1441 was enacted, we would not be facing the crisis that we now have before us . . . But the suggestion that we are doing this because we want to go to every country in the Middle East and rearrange all of its pieces is not correct.-Colin Powell
Interview with Radio France International
February 28, 2003

So has the strategic decision been made to disarm Iraq of its weapons of mass destruction by the leadership in Baghdad? . . . I think our judgment has to be clearly not.

-Colin Powell
Remarks to UN Security Council
March 7, 2003

Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised.

-George W. Bush
Address to the Nation
March 17, 2003

Well, there is no question that we have evidence and information that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction, biological and chemical particularly . . . all this will be made clear in the course of the operation, for whatever duration it takes.-Ari Fleisher
Press Briefing
March 21, 2003

There is no doubt that the regime of Saddam Hussein possesses weapons of mass destruction. And . . . as this operation continues, those weapons will be identified, found, along with the people who have produced them and who guard them.

-Gen. Tommy Franks
Press Conference
March 22, 2003

I have no doubt we're going to find big stores of weapons of mass destruction.
Defence Policy Board member Kenneth Adelman
Washington Post, p. A27
March 23, 2003

One of our top objectives is to find and destroy the WMD. There are a number of sites.-Pentagon Spokeswoman Victoria Clark
Press Briefing
March 22, 2003

We know where they are. They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat.-Donald Rumsfeld
ABC Interview
March 30, 2003

Obviously the administration intends to publicize all the weapons of mass destruction U.S. forces find -- and there will be plenty.-Neocon scholar Robert Kagan
Washington Post op-ed
April 9, 2003

But make no mistake -- as I said earlier -- we have high confidence that they have weapons of mass destruction. That is what this war was about and it is about. And we have high confidence it will be found.-Ari Fleischer
Press Briefing
April 10, 2003

We are learning more as we interrogate or have discussions with Iraqi scientists and people within the Iraqi structure, that perhaps he destroyed some, perhaps he dispersed some. And so we will find them.-George W. Bush
NBC Interview
April 24, 2003

There are people who in large measure have information that we need . . . so that we can track down the weapons of mass destruction in that country.-Donald Rumsfeld
Press Briefing
April 25, 2003

We'll find them. It'll be a matter of time to do so.-George W. Bush
Remarks to Reporters
May 3, 2003

I'm absolutely sure that there are weapons of mass destruction there and the evidence will be forthcoming. We're just getting it just now.-Colin Powell
Remarks to Reporters
May 4, 2003

We never believed that we'd just tumble over weapons of mass destruction in that country.-Donald Rumsfeld
Fox News Interview
May 4, 2003

I'm not surprised if we begin to uncover the weapons program of Saddam Hussein -- because he had a weapons program.-George W. Bush
Remarks to Reporters
May 6, 2003

U.S. officials never expected that "we were going to open garages and find" weapons of mass destruction.-Condoleeza Rice
Reuters Interview
May 12, 2003

I just don't know whether it was all destroyed years ago -- I mean, there's no question that there were chemical weapons years ago -- whether they were destroyed right before the war, (or) whether they're still hidden.-Maj. Gen. David Petraeus, Commander 101st Airborne
Press Briefing
May 13, 2003

Before the war, there's no doubt in my mind that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, biological and chemical. I expected them to be found. I still expect them to be found.-Gen. Michael Hagee, Commandant of the Marine Corps
Interview with Reporters
May 21, 2003

Given time, given the number of prisoners now that we're interrogating, I'm confident that we're going to find weapons of mass destruction.-Gen. Richard Myers, Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff
NBC Today Show interview
May 26, 2003

They may have had time to destroy them, and I don't know the answer.
-Donald Rumsfeld
Remarks to the Council on Foreign Relations
May 27, 2003

For bureaucratic reasons, we settled on one issue, weapons of mass destruction (as justification for invading Iraq) because it was the one reason everyone could agree on.-Paul Wolfowitz
Vanity Fair interview
May 28, 2003

It was a surprise to me then — it remains a surprise to me now — that we have not uncovered weapons, as you say, in some of the forward dispersal sites. Believe me, it's not for lack of trying. We've been to virtually every ammunition supply point between the Kuwaiti border and Baghdad, but they're simply not there.-Lt. Gen. James Conway, 1st Marine Expeditionary Force
Press Interview
May 30, 2003

Do I think we're going to find something?  Yeah, I kind of do, because I think there's a lot of information out there."
-Maj. Gen. Keith Dayton, Defense Intelligence Agency
Press Conference
May 30, 2003

Oh what a tangled web they weave when first they practice to deceive,

But after they've practiced a little bit, how bloody good get at it.

A pilot who saw the impact, Tim Timmerman, said it had been an American Airways 757. "It added power on its way in," he said. "The nose hit, and the wings came forward and it went up in a fireball."

"Smoke and flames poured out of a large hole punched into the side of the Pentagon. Emergency crews rushed fire engines to the scene and ambulancemen ran towards the flames holding wooden pallets to carry bodies out. A few of the lightly injured, bleeding and covered in dust, were recovering on the lawn outside, some in civilian clothes, some in uniform. A piece of twisted aircraft fuselage lay nearby. No one knew how many people had been killed, but rescue workers were finding it nearly impossible to get to people trapped inside, beaten back by the flames and falling debris."

Just look at all those injured people and ambulances on the lawn and the mess they made, why you can't move for them. That fallen debris is horrendous and have you ever seen such a large hole? And as for them folding wings; well the mind just boggles.

Question: 

In the picture above is there some reason why the fire crews are spraying water and not foam on a fire close to where an airliner carrying 11000gallons of aviation fuel has just entered? Spraying water on a fuel fire from such a close proximity will spread the fire violently and is incredibly dangerous to the fire crews. Remember the fuel tanks in the wings would have ruptured when the wings folded [as the eyewitness said] dumping the fuel on the outside along with the wing wreckage. I would presume that the fire crews would know this, so why are they spraying water on fuel? Why only two appliances and no rescue vehicles?

The lens flare and associated loss of pixel detail running vertically down centre of the photograph caused by the glare of the sun indicates that it is unlikely that the photograph has been tampered with.

PENTALAWN2000

There is growing debate about this incident. People are saying that eyewitness reports of them actually seeing an aircraft crash into the Pentagon overrides any physical evidence to the contrary. Once again 'CANT BE' forms a priori over and above 'IS'. All those UFO eyewitnesses must be pleased now that their eyewitness testimony is now being taken seriously over any physical evidence to the contrary also. For years they've been accused of hallucinating. How did it go? 'Eyewitness reports are notoriously unreliable'.  Only when it suits it seems.

Well the fact is a 757 wouldn't fit into the hole left in wall without leaving some wreckage on the outside of the building [and there is simply no getting over this unassailable fact],  and in this material left on the outside some fuel [contained within the wings] would have been spilled on the outside. Now take a look at the picture above and the dozens of other photographs shown at PENTALAWN2000.

The eyewitnesses may indeed have seen some kind of aircraft fly low over them, after all there is an airport nearby, followed by an explosion at the Pentagon wall and their brains married the two incidents together with not a little subconscious embellishment thrown in for good measure. They would have had only a split second to assimilate all the data coming into their brain that would have been in a state of shock. Their shock at witnessing something unexpected and frightening is after all not unlike a UFO encounter. Tests have shown that an unexpected and shocking incident witnessed by ten witnesses has produced ten different versions of the same event. Consistent with this, we do indeed have several versions of this very event from numerous eyewitnesses. Asking for further testimony will indeed now be subject to false memory syndrome coloured by a belief system which says to them that their government would not lie to them in such a large manner.

For those still hopelessly entrapped in blind denial consider the official explanations:

(Advocates of Newton's Third Law of Motion please look away now)

To justify the absence of Boeing debris, the authorities explained that the aircraft was pulverized when it impacted with such a highly reinforced building as the Pentagon.

To explain the disappearance of the aircraft's more resistant components, like the engines or brakes, we were told that the aircraft melted (with the exception of one landing light and its black boxes).

To justify the absence of 100 tons of melted metal, experts attempted to show that the fire exceeded 2500 °C, leading to the evaporation of parts of the aircraft (but not of the building itself or, clearly, of the landing light or black boxes).

To justify the presence of the hole, officials now state that it was caused by the nose of the aircraft, which, despite the rigors of the crash a, continued careering through the three buildings with reinforced walls.

The aircraft thus disintegrated on contact with the Pentagon, melted inside the building, evaporated at 2500° C and still penetrated two other buildings via a hole 2 ½ yards in diameter.

But out of this inferno that completely disintegrated an entire airliner, remains of every single passenger on board the aircraft was somehow extricated and identified

Somebody must have told them to use foam eventually, just look at the mess they made of the windows immediately above the place where that 40 foot high Jumbo Jet entered at 450mph and exploded.

NEWS LINKS

NOT NEWSREEL REAL NEWS

CURRENT NEWS THAT YOU DON'T HEAR

INTERNET TRAFFIC REPORT